Nance Robin M, Crane Heidi M, Ritchings Corey, Rosenblatt Lisa, Budoff Matthew, Heckbert Susan R, Drozd Daniel R, Mathews William C, Geng Elvin, Hunt Peter W, Feinstein Matthew J, Moore Richard D, Hsue Priscilla, Eron Joseph J, Burkholder Greer A, Rodriguez Benigno, Mugavero Michael J, Saag Michael S, Kitahata Mari M, Delaney Joseph A C
1 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
2 Bristol Myers Squibb , New York, New York.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2018 Nov;34(11):916-921. doi: 10.1089/AID.2018.0053. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
The Universal Myocardial infarction (MI) definition divides MIs into different types. Type 1 MIs (T1MI) result spontaneously from atherosclerotic plaque instability. Type 2 MIs (T2MI) are due to secondary causes of myocardial oxygen demand/supply mismatch such as occurs with sepsis. T2MI are much more common among those with HIV than in the general population. T1MI and T2MI have different mechanisms, risk factors, and potential treatments suggesting that they should be distinguished to achieve a better scientific understanding of MIs in HIV. We sought to determine whether MI type could be accurately predicted by patient characteristics without adjudication in HIV-infected individuals. We developed a statistical model to predict T2MI versus T1MI using adjudicated events from six sites utilizing demographic characteristics, traditional cardiovascular, and HIV-related risk factors. Validation was assessed in a seventh site via mean calibration, and discrimination level was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC). Of 812 MIs, 388 were T2MI. HIV-related factors including hepatitis C infection were predictive of T2MI, whereas traditional cardiovascular risk factors including total cholesterol predicted T1MI. The score predicted 69 T2MI in the validation sample resulting in poor calibration, given that 90 T2MIs were observed. The development sample AUC was 0.75 versus 0.65 in the validation sample, suggesting relatively poor discrimination. The level of discrimination to predict MI type based on patient characteristics is insufficient for individual level prediction. Adjudication is required to distinguish MI types, which is necessary to advance understanding of this important outcome among HIV populations.
通用心肌梗死(MI)定义将心肌梗死分为不同类型。1型心肌梗死(T1MI)由动脉粥样硬化斑块不稳定自发导致。2型心肌梗死(T2MI)是由于心肌氧供需不匹配的继发原因引起的,如脓毒症时发生的情况。T2MI在艾滋病毒感染者中比在普通人群中更为常见。T1MI和T2MI具有不同的机制、危险因素和潜在治疗方法,这表明应加以区分,以便更好地科学理解艾滋病毒感染者中的心肌梗死。我们试图确定在未进行判定的情况下,是否可以通过患者特征准确预测艾滋病毒感染者的心肌梗死类型。我们利用来自六个地点的判定事件,开发了一个统计模型,使用人口统计学特征、传统心血管危险因素和艾滋病毒相关危险因素来预测T2MI与T1MI。在第七个地点通过平均校准评估验证情况,并通过曲线下面积(AUC)评估区分水平。在812例心肌梗死中,388例为T2MI。包括丙型肝炎感染在内的艾滋病毒相关因素可预测T2MI,而包括总胆固醇在内的传统心血管危险因素可预测T1MI。该评分在验证样本中预测了69例T2MI,鉴于观察到90例T2MI,校准效果较差。开发样本的AUC为0.75,而验证样本中的AUC为0.65,表明区分能力相对较差。基于患者特征预测心肌梗死类型的区分水平不足以进行个体水平的预测。需要进行判定以区分心肌梗死类型,这对于推进对艾滋病毒人群中这一重要结局的理解是必要的。