1 Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil.
2 Department of Physical Therapy, Centro Universitário UNA, Contagem, Brazil.
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Dec;32(12):1684-1695. doi: 10.1177/0269215518787015. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
: To compare the responsiveness of disability measures with physical activity measures in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) undergoing a course of physical therapy treatment.
: This is a prospective cohort study with two-month follow-up.
: A total of 106 patients presenting with non-specific CLBP of more than three months duration were recruited.
: Disability measures investigated were Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Physical activity measures analyzed include the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire and objective measures derived from an accelerometer (i.e. total time spent in moderate-to-vigorous and light physical activity, number of steps and counts per minute). Disability and physical activity measures were collected at the baseline and after eight weeks of treatment. For the responsiveness analyses, effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) were calculated. Correlations between the change in disability and physical activity measures were calculated.
: Responsiveness for disability measures was considered to be large with ESs ranging from -1.03 to -1.45 and SRMs ranging from -0.99 to -1.34, whereas all physical activity measures showed values lower than 0.20. Changes in disability measures did not correlate with changes in physical activity measures (correlation coefficients ranged from -0.10 to 0.09).
: Disability measures were responsive after a course of physical therapy treatment in patients with CLBP. The lack of responsiveness in the physical activity measures might be due to the inability of these measures to detect change over time or the use of an intervention not designed to increase physical activity levels.
比较慢性下背痛(CLBP)患者接受物理治疗过程中残疾测量与身体活动测量的反应性。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,随访时间为两个月。
共招募了 106 名患有持续时间超过三个月的非特异性 CLBP 的患者。
研究中调查的残疾测量指标包括魁北克腰痛残疾量表和 Roland Morris 残疾问卷。分析的身体活动测量指标包括 Baecke 习惯性身体活动问卷和加速度计得出的客观测量指标(即中度至剧烈和轻度身体活动的总时间、步数和每分钟计数)。在基线和治疗八周后收集残疾和身体活动测量值。为了进行反应性分析,计算了效应大小(ES)和标准化反应均值(SRM)。计算了残疾和身体活动测量值变化之间的相关性。
残疾测量的反应性被认为是大的,ES 值范围为-1.03 至-1.45,SRM 值范围为-0.99 至-1.34,而所有身体活动测量值均低于 0.20。残疾测量值的变化与身体活动测量值的变化没有相关性(相关系数范围为-0.10 至 0.09)。
CLBP 患者接受物理治疗后,残疾测量具有反应性。身体活动测量缺乏反应性可能是由于这些测量无法检测随时间的变化,或者使用的干预措施不是为了提高身体活动水平而设计的。