• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑卒中后失语症的药物治疗疗效和安全性。

The Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Post-stroke Aphasia.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital, and College of Clinical Medicine of Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, China.

出版信息

CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2018;17(7):509-521. doi: 10.2174/1871527317666180706143051.

DOI:10.2174/1871527317666180706143051
PMID:29984673
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aphasia is a common complication after stroke, and traditional speech and language therapy (SLT) has a limited effect on post-stroke aphasia (PSA). While there has been an increasing number of controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of drugs in the treatment of PSA, there have been very few systematic reviews on the efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments in people with PSA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for PSA.

METHODS

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRA), PubMed, Embase, Chinese Journal Full-text Database (CJFD), China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc), Wanfang Data and VIP Information System were searched for randomized controlled trials about pharmacological treatments for PSA. Literature screening using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and methodological quality assessment of the included studies were completed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality was considered high for modified Jadad quality scale scores of 4 to 7. RevMan 5.3 software was used to conduct a meta-analysis of high-quality studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (578 participants) satisfied the eligibility criteria for this systematic review. Five trials (277 participants) assessed donepezil, four studies (124 participants) assessed memantine, three studies (72 participants) assessed bromocriptine, one trial (45 patients) evaluated galantamine, one study (21 patients) evaluated amphetamine, and one trial (39 patients) evaluated levodopa. The systematic review showed that donepezil achieved remarkable results in terms of the aphasia quotient (AQ) (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.48-1.17, P < 0.00001), repetition ability (SMD 0. 81, 95% CI 0.57-1.06, P < 0.00001), naming ability (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.29-0. 84, P < 0.00001), auditory comprehension (SMD 0.85, 95% CI 0.58-1. 13, P< 0.00001) and oral expression (SMD 0.90, 95% CI 0.54-1.26, P < 0.00001). Memantine showed no pronounced improvement in auditory comprehension (SMD 0.35, 95% CI -0.05-0.74, P = 0.09) but did improve the AQ (SMD 0.57, 95% CI 0.09-1.06, P = 0. 02), naming ability (SMD 0.81, 95% CI 0.38-1.25, P = 0.0002), spontaneous speech (SMD 0.76, 95% CI 0. 39- 1.13, P < 0.0001), and repetition ability (SMD 0.37, 95% CI 0.01-0.73, P = 0.04). Bromocriptine showed pronounced improvement in naming ability (SMD -0.20, 95% CI- 0.67-0.26, P = 0.39), verbal fluency (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.53-0.56, P = 0.95), and repetition ability (SMD 0.29, 95% CI -0.23-0. 81, P = 0.28). There is limited and inconclusive evidence for galantamine, amphetamine and levodopa.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that drugs, such as donepezil and memantine, can improve the prognosis of PSA. Donepezil has a significant effect in improving the ability of auditory comprehension, naming, repetition and oral expression. Memantine has a significant effect in improving the ability of naming, spontaneous speech and repetition. Bromocriptine showed no significant improvements in the treatment of aphasia after stroke. Data regarding galantamine, amphetamine and levodopa in the treatment of aphasia after stroke are limited and inconclusive.

摘要

背景

失语症是中风后的常见并发症,传统的言语和语言治疗(SLT)对中风后失语症(PSA)的效果有限。虽然已经有越来越多的关于药物治疗 PSA 疗效的对照临床试验,但关于 PSA 药物治疗的疗效和安全性的系统评价却很少。

目的

评估药物干预 PSA 的疗效和安全性。

方法

系统检索 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库(CENTRA)、PubMed、Embase、中国期刊全文数据库(CJFD)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBMdisc)、万方数据知识服务平台和 VIP 信息系统中关于 PSA 药物治疗的随机对照试验。使用纳入和排除标准进行文献筛选,由两名独立 reviewers 完成纳入研究的数据提取和方法学质量评估。改良 Jadad 质量量表评分为 4 至 7 分的研究被认为具有较高的方法学质量。使用 RevMan 5.3 软件对高质量研究进行荟萃分析。

结果

共有 15 项研究(578 名参与者)符合本系统评价的纳入标准。五项试验(277 名参与者)评估了多奈哌齐,四项研究(124 名参与者)评估了美金刚,三项研究(72 名参与者)评估了溴隐亭,一项试验(45 名患者)评估了加兰他敏,一项研究(21 名患者)评估了安非他命,一项试验(39 名患者)评估了左旋多巴。系统评价显示,多奈哌齐在失语症商数(AQ)(SMD 0.82,95%CI 0.48-1.17,P<0.00001)、重复能力(SMD 0.81,95%CI 0.57-1.06,P<0.00001)、命名能力(SMD 0.56,95%CI 0.29-0.84,P<0.00001)、听觉理解能力(SMD 0.85,95%CI 0.58-1.13,P<0.00001)和口语表达能力(SMD 0.90,95%CI 0.54-1.26,P<0.00001)方面均取得显著效果。美金刚在听觉理解能力方面无显著改善(SMD 0.35,95%CI -0.05-0.74,P=0.09),但改善了 AQ(SMD 0.57,95%CI 0.09-1.06,P=0.02)、命名能力(SMD 0.81,95%CI 0.38-1.25,P=0.0002)、自发言语能力(SMD 0.76,95%CI 0.39-1.13,P<0.0001)和重复能力(SMD 0.37,95%CI 0.01-0.73,P=0.04)。溴隐亭在命名能力(SMD -0.20,95%CI-0.67-0.26,P=0.39)、言语流畅性(SMD 0.02,95%CI 0.53-0.56,P=0.95)和重复能力(SMD 0.29,95%CI -0.23-0.81,P=0.28)方面表现出显著改善。加兰他敏、安非他命和左旋多巴的证据有限且不一致。

结论

目前的证据表明,药物如多奈哌齐和美金刚可改善 PSA 的预后。多奈哌齐在改善听觉理解、命名、重复和口语表达能力方面有显著效果。美金刚在改善命名、自发言语和重复能力方面有显著效果。溴隐亭在治疗中风后失语症方面无显著改善。加兰他敏、安非他命和左旋多巴治疗中风后失语症的数据有限且不一致。

相似文献

1
The Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacological Treatments for Post-stroke Aphasia.脑卒中后失语症的药物治疗疗效和安全性。
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2018;17(7):509-521. doi: 10.2174/1871527317666180706143051.
2
Acupuncture is effective in improving functional communication in post-stroke aphasia : A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针刺疗法在改善脑卒中后失语症患者的功能性沟通方面有效:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 May;131(9-10):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s00508-019-1478-5. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
3
Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患者认知功能衰退的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD011546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011546.pub2.
4
The effectiveness and safety of noninvasive brain stimulation technology combined with speech training on aphasia after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.非侵入性脑刺激技术联合言语训练对脑卒中后失语症的疗效和安全性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jan 12;103(2):e36880. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036880.
5
Long-term effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with speech language therapy (SLT) on post-stroke aphasia patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合言语语言治疗(SLT)对脑卒中后失语症患者的长期影响:系统评价和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
NeuroRehabilitation. 2023;53(3):285-296. doi: 10.3233/NRE-230099.
6
Effects of Five-Element Music on Language Recovery in Patients with Poststroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.五行音乐对脑卒中后失语症患者语言康复的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):993-1004. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0479. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
7
Effectiveness of Acupuncture for Poststroke Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.针刺治疗脑卒中后失语症的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Complement Med Res. 2021;28(6):545-556. doi: 10.1159/000512672. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
8
Galantamine administration in chronic post-stroke aphasia.加兰他敏治疗慢性脑卒中后失语症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;83(7):675-80. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-302268. Epub 2012 May 17.
9
Evaluation of rTMS in patients with poststroke aphasia: a systematic review and focused meta-analysis.rTMS 治疗脑卒中后失语症的疗效评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurol Sci. 2022 Aug;43(8):4685-4694. doi: 10.1007/s10072-022-06092-x. Epub 2022 May 2.
10
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Cholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine Based on Dosage in Patients with Vascular Cognitive Impairment: A Network Meta-analysis.基于剂量的胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚对血管性认知障碍患者的疗效及可接受性比较:一项网状Meta分析
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2022;19(2):133-145. doi: 10.2174/1567205019666220120112301.

引用本文的文献

1
Aphasia rehabilitation: a narrative review of adjuvant techniques.失语症康复:辅助技术的叙述性综述
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jul 30;19:1554147. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1554147. eCollection 2025.
2
Pharmacotherapy for Poststroke Cognitive Impairment and Poststroke Cognitive Impairment With Dementia: A Review.中风后认知障碍及中风后痴呆伴认知障碍的药物治疗:综述
Stroke Res Treat. 2025 May 18;2025:6893801. doi: 10.1155/srat/6893801. eCollection 2025.
3
Neurostimulant Use for Rehabilitation and Recovery After Stroke: A Narrative Literature Review.
用于中风后康复和恢复的神经兴奋剂:一篇叙述性文献综述。
Stroke. 2025 Jul;56(7):1853-1871. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048677. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
4
Case Report: Reversible alien hand syndrome caused by cerebral infarction.病例报告:脑梗死所致可逆性异己手综合征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;19:1551539. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1551539. eCollection 2025.
5
Efficacy and safety of DL-3-N-butylphthalide in the treatment of ischemic poststroke aphasia: A randomized clinical trial.丁苯酞治疗缺血性脑卒中后失语症的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Dec;11(12):3300-3309. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52238. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
6
Neuronal Cell Differentiation of iPSCs for the Clinical Treatment of Neurological Diseases.用于神经疾病临床治疗的诱导多能干细胞的神经元细胞分化
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 18;12(6):1350. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12061350.
7
Analysis of online prescription patterns in Chinese patients with sequelae of cerebral infarction: a real-world study.中文脑梗死后遗症患者网络处方模式分析:真实世界研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 25;14(1):11962. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62923-1.
8
Efficacy and safety of mirror therapy for post-stroke aphasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.镜像疗法治疗脑卒中后失语症的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2024 May 8;19(5):e0301468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301468. eCollection 2024.
9
A literature review and meta-analysis of the optimal factors study of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in post-infarction aphasia.文献回顾和荟萃分析:重复经颅磁刺激治疗脑梗死后失语症的最佳因素研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01525-5.
10
Turning the Spotlight to Cholinergic Pharmacotherapy of the Human Language System.将聚光灯转向人类语言系统的胆碱能药物治疗。
CNS Drugs. 2023 Jul;37(7):599-637. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01017-4. Epub 2023 Jun 21.