Garcia Gabriela, Ramos Fernando, Maldonado Juan, Fernandez Antonio, Yáñez Jorge, Hernandez Lilian, Gaytán Paul
Laboratorio de Microbiología Molecular, Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Clínicas de Periodoncia and Ortodoncia, División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Parasitol Res. 2018 Sep;117(9):2941-2948. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-5990-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
Advances in molecular biology have facilitated analyses of the oral microbiome; however, the parasites role is poorly understood. Periodontal disease is a multifactorial process involving complex interactions among microorganisms, the host, and environmental factors. At present, the precise composition of the mouth parasites microbiota is unclear. Two protozoan species have been detected in the oral microbiota: Trichomonas tenax and Entamoeba gingivalis, and a new variant, E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli, was recently identified by us. In this study, both E. gingivalis and the new E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli variant were detected in the oral cavities of people with healthy periodontium, individuals undergoing orthodontic treatment, and patients with periodontal disease. In the group with healthy periodontium, the prevalence of E. gingivalis-ST1 was 48.6% and that of E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli 29.5%, with a combined prevalence of 54.3%. In patients undergoing orthodontics treatment, 81.2% carried both amoebas, with 47.5% having E. gingivalis-ST1 and 73.8% E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli. In people with periodontal disease, the prevalence of E. gingivalis-ST1 was 57.8%, and that of E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli 50.0%, with a combined prevalence of 73.5%; hence, E. gingivalis-ST1 and E gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli were detected in all three groups. The question arises, what are E. gingivalis-ST1 and E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli doing in the oral cavity? Although, the answer remains unclear, our results suggest that each amoeba subtype is genetically distinct, and they exhibit different patterns of infectious behavior. We hypothesize that E. gingivalis-ST1 and E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli may represent separate species. Our data contribute to better understanding of the roles of E. gingivalis-ST1 and E. gingivalis-ST2-kamaktli in the oral microbiota.
分子生物学的进展促进了对口腔微生物群的分析;然而,寄生虫的作用却知之甚少。牙周病是一个多因素过程,涉及微生物、宿主和环境因素之间的复杂相互作用。目前,口腔寄生虫微生物群的确切组成尚不清楚。在口腔微生物群中已检测到两种原生动物:口腔毛滴虫和牙龈内阿米巴,并且我们最近鉴定出一种新的变体,即牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli。在这项研究中,牙龈内阿米巴和新的牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli变体在牙周健康者、接受正畸治疗的个体以及牙周病患者的口腔中均被检测到。在牙周健康组中,牙龈内阿米巴ST1的患病率为48.6%,牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli的患病率为29.5%,合并患病率为54.3%。在接受正畸治疗的患者中,81.2%的人同时携带这两种阿米巴,其中47.5%的人感染牙龈内阿米巴ST1,73.8%的人感染牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli。在牙周病患者中,牙龈内阿米巴ST1的患病率为57.8%,牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli的患病率为50.0%,合并患病率为73.5%;因此,在所有三组中均检测到牙龈内阿米巴ST1和牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli。问题来了,牙龈内阿米巴ST1和牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli在口腔中起什么作用?尽管答案仍不明确,但我们的结果表明,每种阿米巴亚型在基因上是不同的,并且它们表现出不同的感染行为模式。我们假设牙龈内阿米巴ST1和牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli可能代表不同的物种。我们的数据有助于更好地理解牙龈内阿米巴ST1和牙龈内阿米巴ST2-kamaktli在口腔微生物群中的作用。