• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ASGE 内镜逆行胰胆管造影分级系统可预测三级转诊医院的成功率和并发症发生率。

The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital.

机构信息

Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Avenue, C3-GAS, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):448-453. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6317-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6317-7
PMID:29987568
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The utility of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) grading scale assessing complexity of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has not been evaluated in clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients that underwent ERCP between January 2015 and December 2015 were included. Procedural difficulty was graded according to the grading system proposed by the ASGE workshop. Technical success rates and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 1355 ERCPs were performed on 934 patients. Patients were equally divided with respect to gender and had a mean age of 58 years (range 29-86). 391 cases were grade 1, 2 (29%), 695 were grade 3 (51%), and 269 were grade 4 (20%). Altered anatomy was observed in 88% of grade 4 patients. Cannulation was achieved in 98% of cases graded 1-3 and in 88% of cases graded 4 (p < 0.05). Complications were recorded in 10% of all cases with post-ERCP pancreatitis (5.4%) and procedure-related bleeding (1.5%) being the more common ones. No statistically significant difference was noted between the groups with regard to complications. Three perforations were seen in grade 1-3 cases (0.3%) compared to 4 cases in grade 4 cases (1.5%), (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The grading system proposed by the ASGE workshop can aid in predicting cannulation success and perforation rates in ERCP. Based on this retrospective study, the most complex ERCP procedures can be achieved with encouraging rates of success. There is a need to validate our study with prospective ones performed in other high-volume centers.

摘要

背景

美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)评估内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)复杂性的分级量表在临床实践中尚未得到评估。

方法

纳入 2015 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间行 ERCP 的患者。根据 ASGE 研讨会提出的分级系统对手术难度进行分级。记录技术成功率和并发症。

结果

共对 934 例患者的 1355 例 ERCP 进行了研究。患者在性别方面平均分为两组,平均年龄为 58 岁(范围 29-86 岁)。391 例为 1 级(29%),695 例为 2 级(51%),269 例为 3 级(20%)。4 级患者中有 88%存在解剖结构改变。1-3 级的插管成功率为 98%,4 级的插管成功率为 88%(p<0.05)。所有病例中有 10%发生并发症,其中胰腺炎(5.4%)和与操作相关的出血(1.5%)更为常见。各组之间在并发症方面无统计学差异。1-3 级中发生 3 例穿孔(0.3%),4 级中发生 4 例穿孔(1.5%)(p=0.01)。

结论

ASGE 研讨会提出的分级系统可帮助预测 ERCP 中的插管成功率和穿孔率。基于这项回顾性研究,最复杂的 ERCP 操作可以成功完成,且成功率较高。需要在其他高容量中心进行前瞻性研究来验证我们的研究。

相似文献

1
The ASGE grading system for ERCP can predict success and complication rates in a tertiary referral hospital.ASGE 内镜逆行胰胆管造影分级系统可预测三级转诊医院的成功率和并发症发生率。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):448-453. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6317-7. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
The assessment of the ASGE-grading system of ERCP: a large-sample retrospective study.对 ASGE 分级系统的 ERCP 评估:一项大样本回顾性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6480-6487. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-09000-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Assessment of the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography grading system: A prospective study from a tertiary care center.内镜逆行胰胆管造影分级系统的评估:来自三级医疗中心的前瞻性研究。
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;27(2):187-91. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150366. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
4
Quality indicators, including complications, of ERCP in a community setting: a prospective study.社区环境下内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的质量指标,包括并发症:一项前瞻性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):457-67. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.11.022. Epub 2009 May 30.
5
Risk factors for ERCP-related complications and what is the specific role of ASGE grading system.内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关并发症的危险因素以及美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)分级系统的具体作用是什么。
J Res Med Sci. 2023 Feb 21;28:7. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Dye-free wire-guided cannulation of the biliary tree during ERCP is associated with high success and low complication rates: outcomes in a single operator experience of 822 cases.无染料导丝胆管插管在 ERCP 中的应用与高成功率和低并发症发生率相关:一位操作者 822 例经验的结果。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Mar;44(3):e57-62. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181aacbd1.
7
Outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography during live endoscopy demonstrations.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术在现场内镜演示中的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1931-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2130-2. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
8
Surgeon-performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Outcomes of 2392 procedures at two tertiary care centers.外科医生施行的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术。在两个三级护理中心进行的 2392 例手术的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jun;32(6):2871-2876. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5995-x. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
9
Stricter national standards are required for credentialing of endoscopic-retrograde-cholangiopancreatography in the United States.美国需要更严格的内镜逆行胰胆管造影认证标准。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jul 21;25(27):3468-3483. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i27.3468.
10
The H.O.U.S.E. classification: a novel endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complexity grading scale.H.O.U.S.E. 分类法:一种新型的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)复杂性分级量表。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 9;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0583-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Mortality in a Cohort of Elderly Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.肌肉减少症作为接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的老年患者队列中死亡率的预测指标。
Life (Basel). 2024 Dec 28;15(1):21. doi: 10.3390/life15010021.
2
Quality Indicators of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Korea.韩国的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术质量指标。
Gut Liver. 2024 Jul 15;18(4):564-577. doi: 10.5009/gnl230427. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Endoscopic Management of Difficult Biliary Stones: An Evergreen Issue.内镜处理复杂胆道结石:一个常青问题。

本文引用的文献

1
The Future of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的未来
Gastroenterology. 2017 Aug;153(2):338-344. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.06.015. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
The H.O.U.S.E. classification: a novel endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complexity grading scale.H.O.U.S.E. 分类法:一种新型的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)复杂性分级量表。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar 9;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0583-z.
3
Adverse events associated with ERCP.与内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)相关的不良事件。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 19;60(2):340. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020340.
4
Outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with situs inversus viscerum.内脏转位患者的内镜逆行胰胆管造影术结果
Clin Endosc. 2023 Nov;56(6):790-794. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.292. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
5
Risk factors for ERCP-related complications and what is the specific role of ASGE grading system.内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)相关并发症的危险因素以及美国胃肠内镜学会(ASGE)分级系统的具体作用是什么。
J Res Med Sci. 2023 Feb 21;28:7. doi: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_150_22. eCollection 2023.
6
Experience of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with side-viewing duodenoscope in patients with previous gastric surgery.既往有胃手术史患者使用侧视十二指肠镜进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影的经验。
Turk J Surg. 2022 Jun 29;38(2):149-158. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5490. eCollection 2022 Jun.
7
Effectiveness of supraglottic ventilation by transtracheal catheter for painless ERCP.经气管导管声门上通气用于无痛内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的有效性
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):8165-8171. eCollection 2021.
8
Development of an automated ERCP Quality Report Card using structured data fields.使用结构化数据字段开发自动内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)质量报告卡。
Tech Innov Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;23(2):129-138. doi: 10.1016/j.tige.2021.01.005. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
9
Outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus primary LCBDE for managing cholecystocholedocholithiasis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影失败后行腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)与初次行LCBDE治疗胆囊胆总管结石的疗效比较
J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520957560. doi: 10.1177/0300060520957560.
10
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, lights and shadows: Handle with care.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术,光影之间:谨慎操作。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Mar 16;11(3):219-230. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i3.219.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan;85(1):32-47. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.06.051. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
4
Prospective evaluation of ERCP performance: results of a nationwide quality registry.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)操作的前瞻性评估:一项全国性质量登记研究的结果
Endoscopy. 2015 Jun;47(6):503-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1391231. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
5
Quality indicators for ERCP.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的质量指标
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):91-101. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.386. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
6
What predicts failed cannulation and therapy at ERCP? Results of a large-scale multicenter analysis.哪些因素可预测 ERCP 中的插管失败和治疗失败?一项大规模多中心分析的结果。
Endoscopy. 2012 Jul;44(7):674-83. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309345. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
Complications of ERCP.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的并发症
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):467-73. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.07.010.
8
Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party.内镜操作复杂程度分级:美国胃肠内镜学会工作组的研究结果。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 May;73(5):868-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.12.036. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
9
A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop.内镜不良事件词汇表:美国胃肠内镜学会研讨会报告
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027.
10
Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)操作的客观评估:一种评估技术难度的简单分级量表
Postgrad Med J. 2003 Aug;79(934):467-70. doi: 10.1136/pmj.79.934.467.