Paparazzo Ernesto
Istituto di Struttura della Materia del CNR, Via Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Rome, Italy.
J Phys Condens Matter. 2018 Aug 30;30(34):343003. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/aad248. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS) work on CeO and CeO oxides has been an active topic of research over the past four decades or so. Such research aimed to find the reasons for the unusual complexity of Ce3d spectra of the two oxides, and it studied catalytic properties of materials that contained them. I discuss how theoretical and experimental studies exploited the diagnostic potential of XPS to reach our current knowledge of the electronic properties of the two oxides. A part of these studies provided peak-fitting guidelines to resolve Ce3d spectra produced by the co-existence of both oxides into the individual spectral components arising from Ce and Ce ions. Basing myself on the analysis of several peak-fittings of Ce3d spectra carried out in studies of the catalytic applications of CeO-based materials, I show that more often than not they largely ignore the findings of theoretical, experimental, and methodological XPS work. I discuss typical problems that flaw Ce3d peak-fittings, and how they affect their accuracy. I argue that, although several XPS studies do list primary literature of Ce3d spectra in their bibliography, they often do so for decorative purposes, rather than practical purposes.
在过去大约四十年里,关于CeO和CeO氧化物的X射线光电子能谱(XPS)研究一直是一个活跃的研究课题。这类研究旨在找出这两种氧化物Ce3d光谱异常复杂的原因,并研究包含它们的材料的催化性能。我将讨论理论和实验研究如何利用XPS的诊断潜力来获得我们目前对这两种氧化物电子性质的认识。这些研究的一部分提供了峰拟合指南,以将由两种氧化物共存产生的Ce3d光谱分解为由Ce和Ce离子产生的各个光谱成分。基于对CeO基材料催化应用研究中进行的几次Ce3d光谱峰拟合分析,我表明它们往往很大程度上忽略了理论、实验和方法学XPS研究的结果。我将讨论Ce3d峰拟合中存在的典型问题,以及它们如何影响其准确性。我认为,尽管一些XPS研究在其参考文献中确实列出了Ce3d光谱的主要文献,但他们这样做往往是为了装饰目的,而非实际目的。