Bloch Evan M, Ingram Charlotte, Hull Jennifer, Fawcus Susan, Anthony John, Green-Thompson Randolph, Crookes Robert L, Ngcobo Solomuzi, V Creel Darryl, Courtney Lauren, Bellairs Greg R M, Murphy Edward L
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Blood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California.
Transfusion. 2018 Sep;58(9):2149-2156. doi: 10.1111/trf.14772. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Obstetric hemorrhage (OH) and access to peripartum blood transfusion remains a global health challenge. The rates of peripartum transfusion in South Africa exceed those in high-income countries despite comparable rates of OH. We sought to evaluate factors associated with peripartum transfusion.
A case-control study was conducted at four large South African hospitals. Transfused peripartum women (cases) and nontransfused controls were stratum matched 1:2 by hospital and delivery date. Data on obstetric, transfusion, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) history were abstracted from medical records. Blood was obtained for laboratory evaluation. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for transfusion using logistic regression.
A total of 1200 transfused cases and 2434 controls were evaluated. Antepartum hemorrhage (OR, 197.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 104.27-375.78), hemorrhage with vaginal delivery (OR, 136.46; 95% CI, 75.87-245.18), prenatal anemia (OR, 22.76; 95% CI, 12.34-41.93 for prenatal hemoglobin level < 7 g/dL), and failed access to prenatal care (OR, 6.71; 95% CI, 4.32-10.42) were the major risk factors for transfusion. Platelet (PLT) count (ORs, 4.10, 2.66, and 1.77 for ≤50 × 10 , 51 × 10 -100 × 10 , and 101 × 10 -150 × 10 cells/L, respectively), HIV infection (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.62), and admitting hospital (twofold variation) were also associated with transfusion. Mode of delivery, race, age category, gravidity, parity, gestational age, and birthweight were not independently associated with transfusion.
Major risk factors of peripartum transfusion in South Africa, namely, prenatal anemia and access to prenatal care, may be amenable to intervention. HIV infection and moderately low PLT count are novel risk factors that merit further investigation.
产科出血(OH)及围产期输血问题仍是一项全球卫生挑战。尽管南非的产科出血发生率与高收入国家相近,但其围产期输血率却高于高收入国家。我们旨在评估与围产期输血相关的因素。
在南非的四家大型医院开展了一项病例对照研究。对围产期接受输血的女性(病例组)和未接受输血的对照组,按医院及分娩日期以1:2的比例进行分层匹配。从医疗记录中提取产科、输血及人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)病史的数据。采集血液进行实验室评估。我们使用逻辑回归计算输血的未调整及调整比值比(OR)。
共评估了1200例接受输血的病例和2434例对照。产前出血(OR,197.95;95%置信区间[CI],104.27 - 375.78)、阴道分娩时出血(OR,136.46;95% CI,75.87 - 245.18)、产前贫血(对于产前血红蛋白水平<7 g/dL,OR,22.76;95% CI,12.34 - 41.93)以及无法获得产前护理(OR,6.71;95% CI,4.32 - 10.42)是输血的主要危险因素。血小板(PLT)计数(对于≤50×10⁹/L、51×10⁹ - 100×10⁹/L和101×10⁹ - 150×10⁹/L,OR分别为4.10、2.66和1.77)、HIV感染(OR,1.29;95% CI,1.02 - 1.62)以及收治医院(有两倍差异)也与输血相关。分娩方式、种族、年龄类别、孕次、产次、孕周及出生体重与输血无独立相关性。
南非围产期输血的主要危险因素,即产前贫血和获得产前护理的情况,可能适合进行干预。HIV感染和血小板计数中度降低是值得进一步研究的新危险因素。