Howarth Emma, Moore Theresa Hm, Stanley Nicky, MacMillan Harriet L, Feder Gene, Shaw Alison
National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Care (CLAHRC) East of England, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Mar;27(2):271-292. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12587. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Children who grow up in homes affected by domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are at risk of poor outcomes across the lifespan, yet there is limited evidence on the acceptability and effectiveness of interventions for them. A recent review of child-focused interventions highlighted a gap in understanding the factors influencing the willingness of parents and children to engage with these programmes. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative evidence on the experiences of receiving and delivering interventions with the aim of identifying factors at different levels of the social-ecological context that may influence parent and child readiness to take up interventions. We searched literature till April 2016 and found 12 reports of eight programmes. Two authors independently screened papers for inclusion, extracted data and identified the first- and second-order constructs. The third-order constructs were derived and fitted to the ecological framework to inform a picture of readiness to engage with interventions. Three key findings emerged from this review: (a) parent and child readiness is influenced by a complex interplay of individual, relationship and organisational factors, highlighting that individual readiness to take up child-focussed interventions must be viewed in an ecological context; (b) the specific process through which women become ready to engage in or facilitate child-focussed interventions may differ from that related to uptake of safety-promoting behaviours and requires parents to be aware of the impact of DVA on children and to focus on children's needs; (c) there are distinct but interlinked processes through which parents and children reach a point of readiness to engage in an interventions aimed at improving child outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for both practice and research.
在受家庭暴力和虐待(DVA)影响的家庭中成长的儿童,在其整个生命周期内都面临着不良后果的风险,但针对他们的干预措施的可接受性和有效性方面的证据有限。最近一项针对以儿童为重点的干预措施的综述强调,在理解影响父母和儿童参与这些项目意愿的因素方面存在差距。我们对接受和提供干预措施的经验的定性证据进行了系统综述,目的是确定社会生态背景不同层面上可能影响父母和儿童接受干预措施意愿的因素。我们检索了截至2016年4月的文献,发现了八个项目的12份报告。两位作者独立筛选论文以确定是否纳入,提取数据并确定一阶和二阶结构。推导出三阶结构并将其与生态框架相匹配,以了解接受干预措施的意愿情况。本次综述得出了三个关键发现:(a)父母和儿童的接受意愿受到个人、关系和组织因素复杂相互作用的影响,这突出表明,必须在生态背景下看待个人接受以儿童为重点的干预措施的意愿;(b)女性准备参与或促进以儿童为重点的干预措施的具体过程可能与接受促进安全行为的过程不同,这要求父母意识到家庭暴力对儿童的影响,并关注儿童的需求;(c)父母和儿童达到准备参与旨在改善儿童结局的干预措施这一点的过程是不同但相互关联的。我们讨论了这些发现对实践和研究的意义。