• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

空间选择性注意偏差受长期音乐体验和短期音调暴露的影响。

Spatial selective attention biases are shaped by long-term musical experience and short-term exposure to tones.

作者信息

Cruse Alyssa, Offen Kelsey, Markant Julie

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Tulane University, 2700 Percival Stern Hall, 6400 Freret St., New Orleans, LA 70118, United States.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2018 Aug;125:106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.006
PMID:29990700
Abstract

Selective attention is a dynamic process that rapidly shifts processing resources to information that is most relevant to our goals. Although individuals often show spatial biases in attention, these biases can be modified by both long-term factors, such as musical training, or by momentary changes in the auditory context. The present study used a visual search task to examine the influence of these factors on spatial attention biases while increasing demands on selective attention. Experiment 1 examined the effects of musical experience on baseline spatial selective attention biases during search. Individuals with little musical experience showed a typical leftward response bias that became stronger as the number of distractors increased. However, those with more musical experience showed similar responses to targets on the left and right sides, indicating an attenuation of the typical leftward spatial attention bias. Experiment 2 examined whether the addition of low- and high-frequency tones dynamically influenced participants' spatial attention biases during visual search. Participants showed increased orienting to and scanning of left-side distractor locations in response to low-frequency tones regardless of musical experience. The present results demonstrate that spatial attention biases are dynamic and can be shaped by both long-term experiences and momentary contextual effects.

摘要

选择性注意是一个动态过程,它会迅速将处理资源转移到与我们目标最相关的信息上。尽管个体在注意力方面常常表现出空间偏向,但这些偏向既可以被长期因素(如音乐训练)改变,也可以被听觉环境的瞬间变化改变。本研究使用视觉搜索任务来检验这些因素对空间注意偏向的影响,同时增加对选择性注意的要求。实验1考察了音乐经验对搜索过程中基线空间选择性注意偏向的影响。音乐经验较少的个体表现出典型的向左反应偏向,且随着干扰项数量的增加而增强。然而,那些音乐经验较多的个体对左侧和右侧目标的反应相似,表明典型的向左空间注意偏向有所减弱。实验2考察了在视觉搜索过程中,添加低频和高频音调是否会动态影响参与者的空间注意偏向。无论音乐经验如何,参与者在听到低频音调时,对左侧干扰项位置的定向和扫描都会增加。目前的结果表明,空间注意偏向是动态的,并且可以被长期经验和瞬间情境效应所塑造。

相似文献

1
Spatial selective attention biases are shaped by long-term musical experience and short-term exposure to tones.空间选择性注意偏差受长期音乐体验和短期音调暴露的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2018 Aug;125:106-117. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.跨模态对注意不对称性的影响:注意定向与唤醒的叠加效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Feb;96:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
Upper visual field distractors preferentially bias attention to the left.上视野干扰物优先将注意力偏向左侧。
Cortex. 2015 Mar;64:179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.018. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
4
The influence of baseline directional differences in pseudoneglect on distractibility.假性忽视中基线方向差异对注意力分散的影响。
Cortex. 2016 Apr;77:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
5
Aging and Orienting of Visual Attention: Emergence of a Rightward Attentional Bias with Aging?视觉注意的老化与定向:随着年龄增长,向右注意偏向会出现吗?
Dev Neuropsychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;44(3):310-324. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2019.1605517. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
Evidence for a common mechanism of spatial attention and visual awareness: Towards construct validity of pseudoneglect.空间注意和视觉意识的共同机制证据:朝向假性忽视的建构效度。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 7;14(3):e0212998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212998. eCollection 2019.
7
Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.灰度知觉的不对称性:基于对象的与基于空间的影响。
Cortex. 2012 May;48(5):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.015. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
8
Influence of reward learning on visual attention and eye movements in a naturalistic environment: A virtual reality study.奖励学习对自然环境中视觉注意和眼动的影响:一项虚拟现实研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 5;13(12):e0207990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207990. eCollection 2018.
9
Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.跨感觉模式的自愿和刺激驱动的空间注意机制之间的相互作用。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Dec;21(12):2384-97. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21178.
10
The effect of cerebral asymmetries and eye scanning on pseudoneglect for a visual search task.大脑不对称性和眼动扫描对视觉搜索任务中假性忽视的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2017 Feb;111:134-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 4.