IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;66(3):640-646. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2852755. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
In this study, we propose a sensory stimulation training (SST) approach to improve the performance of a brain-computer interface (BCI) based on somatosensory attentional orientation (SAO). In this BCI, subjects imagine the tactile sensation and maintain the attention on the corresponding hand as if there was a tactile stimulus on the wrist skin. Twenty BCI naïve subjects were recruited and randomly divided into a Control-Group and an SST-Group. In the Control-Group, subjects performed left hand and right hand SAO tasks in six consecutive runs (with 40 trials in each run), divided into three blocks with each having two runs. For the SST-Group, two runs included real tactile stimulation to the left or right hand (SST training block), between the first two (Pre-SST block) and the last two SAO runs (Post-SST block). Results showed that the SST-Group had a significantly improved performance of 9.4% between the last block and the first block after SST training (F = 11.11, p = 0.0007); in contrast, no significant difference was found in the Control-Group between the first, second, and the last block (F = 2.07, p = 0.1546), indicating no learning effect. The tactile sensation-induced oscillatory dynamics were similar to those induced by SAO. In the SST-Group, R discriminative information was enhanced around the somatosensory cortex due to the real sensory stimulation as compared with that in the Control-Group. Since the SAO mental task is inherently an internal process, the proposed SST method is meant as an adjuvant to SAO to facilitate subjects in achieving an initial SAO-based BCI control.
在这项研究中,我们提出了一种感觉刺激训练(SST)方法,以提高基于体感注意定向(SAO)的脑机接口(BCI)的性能。在这种 BCI 中,受试者想象触觉感觉,并将注意力保持在手的相应位置,就好像手腕皮肤上有触觉刺激一样。我们招募了 20 名 BCI 新手,并将他们随机分为对照组和 SST 组。在对照组中,受试者在六个连续的运行中进行左手和右手 SAO 任务(每个运行中有 40 个试验),分为三个块,每个块有两个运行。对于 SST 组,两个运行包括对左手或右手的真实触觉刺激(SST 训练块),在第一个和第二个运行(Pre-SST 块)和最后两个 SAO 运行(Post-SST 块)之间。结果表明,SST 组在 SST 训练后最后一个块和第一个块之间的表现有显著提高,提高了 9.4%(F = 11.11,p = 0.0007);相比之下,对照组在第一个、第二个和最后一个块之间没有发现显著差异(F = 2.07,p = 0.1546),表明没有学习效果。触觉诱导的振荡动力学与 SAO 诱导的振荡动力学相似。在 SST 组中,与对照组相比,由于真实的感觉刺激,感觉皮层周围的 R 判别信息得到了增强。由于 SAO 心理任务本质上是一个内部过程,因此所提出的 SST 方法是对 SAO 的辅助,以帮助受试者实现基于 SAO 的初始 BCI 控制。