• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植术后的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV评分

APACHE IV score in postoperative kidney transplantation.

作者信息

Rodrigues-Filho Edison Moraes, Garcez Anderson

机构信息

Unidade de Terapia Intensiva de Transplantes, Hospital Dom Vicente Scherer, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.

Rede Integrada de Pesquisa Institucional em Medicina Intensiva, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre - Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):181-186. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180032.

DOI:10.5935/0103-507X.20180032
PMID:29995083
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031414/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the calibration and discrimination of APACHE IV in the postoperative period after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

This clinical cohort study included 986 hospitalized adult patients in the immediate postoperative period after kidney transplantation, in a single center in southern Brazil.

RESULTS

Kidney transplant patients who died in hospital had significantly higher APACHE IV values and higher predicted mortality. The APACHE IV score showed adequate calibration (H-L 11.24 p = 0.188) and a good discrimination ROC curve of 0.738 (95%CI 0.643 - 0.833, p < 0.001), although SMR overestimated mortality (SMR = 0.73; 95%CI: 0.24 - 1.42, p = 0.664).

CONCLUSIONS

The APACHE IV score showed adequate performance for predicting hospital outcomes in the postoperative period for kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

目的

评估急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)IV在肾移植术后的校准和鉴别能力。

方法

这项临床队列研究纳入了巴西南部一个中心的986例肾移植术后即刻住院的成年患者。

结果

在医院死亡的肾移植患者的APACHE IV值显著更高,预测死亡率也更高。APACHE IV评分显示校准良好(H-L 11.24,p = 0.188),鉴别能力良好,ROC曲线为0.738(95%CI 0.643 - 0.833,p < 0.001),尽管标准化死亡比(SMR)高估了死亡率(SMR = 0.73;95%CI:0.24 - 1.42,p = 0.664)。

结论

APACHE IV评分在预测肾移植受者术后医院结局方面表现良好。

相似文献

1
APACHE IV score in postoperative kidney transplantation.肾移植术后的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV评分
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Apr-Jun;30(2):181-186. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180032.
2
[Validation of APACHE IV score in postoperative liver transplantation in southern Brazil: a cohort study].[巴西南部肝移植术后APACHE IV评分的验证:一项队列研究]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.11.010. Epub 2019 May 7.
3
Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.中国某医疗中心中,三种预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的表现。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131329. eCollection 2015.
4
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
5
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.
6
Short-term and long-term outcome prediction with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II system after orthotopic liver transplantation.原位肝移植后应用急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II系统进行短期和长期预后预测
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jan;28(1):150-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200001000-00025.
7
Predictive accuracy of severity scoring system: a prospective cohort study using APACHE III in a Korean intensive care unit.严重程度评分系统的预测准确性:一项在韩国重症监护病房使用APACHE III的前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Mar;40(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(02)00062-7.
8
Performance of three prognostic models in critically ill patients with cancer: a prospective study.三种预后模型在癌症重症患者中的表现:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1242-1249. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01659-0. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
9
Prognostic evaluation of patients undergoing living-donor liver transplant by APACHE II and MELD scores.应用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植患者进行预后评估。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2015 Feb;13(1):41-5. doi: 10.6002/ect.2013.0289. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
10
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiology and health assessment, risk balance, and model for end-stage liver disease scores: Postoperative outcome of liver transplantation.生理学与健康评估、风险平衡以及终末期肝病评分模型:肝移植术后结局
World J Transplant. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):95899. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i1.95899.
2
Association between the Predicted Value of APACHE IV Scores and Intensive Care Unit Mortality: A Secondary Analysis Based on EICU Dataset.急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)IV评分预测值与重症监护病房死亡率之间的关联:基于电子重症监护病房(EICU)数据集的二次分析
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 6;2022:9151925. doi: 10.1155/2022/9151925. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The Epimed Monitor ICU Database®: a cloud-based national registry for adult intensive care unit patients in Brazil.淫羊藿监测重症监护病房数据库®:巴西成人重症监护病房患者的基于云的国家登记系统。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):418-426. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170062. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
2
Impact of Missing Physiologic Data on Performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 Risk-Prediction Model.缺失生理数据对简化急性生理学评分3风险预测模型性能的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Dec;45(12):2006-2013. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002706.
3
What every intensivist should know about prognostic scoring systems and risk-adjusted mortality.
每位重症监护医生都应了解的关于预后评分系统和风险调整死亡率的知识。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2016 Sep;28(3):264-269. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20160052.
4
ICU severity of illness scores: APACHE, SAPS and MPM.重症监护病房疾病严重程度评分:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)和死亡率预测模型(MPM)。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014 Oct;20(5):557-65. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000135.
5
Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of delayed graft function in deceased donor kidney transplantation in a Brazilian center.巴西某中心尸体供肾移植中移植肾功能延迟恢复的发生率、危险因素及预后
Transplant Proc. 2014 Jul-Aug;46(6):1727-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.05.026.
6
SAPS 3, APACHE IV or GRACE: which score to choose for acute coronary syndrome patients in intensive care units?序贯器官衰竭评估系统3(SAPS 3)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统IV(APACHE IV)还是全球急性冠状动脉事件注册研究(GRACE)评分:重症监护病房中的急性冠状动脉综合征患者应选择哪种评分系统?
Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(3):173-8. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2013.1313474.
7
Is SAPS 3 better than APACHE II at predicting mortality in critically ill transplant patients?SAPS 3 预测危重症移植患者死亡率是否优于 APACHE II?
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2013;68(2):153-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2013(02)oa06.
8
Prediction of kidney transplant outcome by donor quality scoring systems: expanded criteria donor and deceased donor score.通过供体质量评分系统预测肾移植结果:扩大标准供体和脑死亡供体评分
Transplant Proc. 2012 Nov;44(9):2555-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.061.
9
The present use of quality indicators in the intensive care unit.目前在重症监护病房中使用的质量指标。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Oct;56(9):1078-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02656.x. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
10
Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 2: maximizing value from outcome prediction scoring systems.危重症严重程度评分:第 2 部分:最大化预后评分系统的价值。
Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2):518-527. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-0331.