Regan Paul, Ball Elaine
Senior Lecturer in Adult Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston.
Senior Lecturer, University of Salford, Salford.
Br J Nurs. 2018 Jul 12;27(13):746-749. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.13.746.
This paper discusses the UK Government's public consultation into the NHS bursary and the response from the Nursing and Midwifery Council. A public consultation stipulated that the current arrangements for funding, by the State, were not to be considered for discussion. Instead, the consultation only appraised views that would lead to the successful introduction of student finance loans for NHS professional education. Testimonies from nurses, midwives and nursing students expressed concern that the new funding arrangements were unaffordable, dis-incentivising and biased towards the marketisation of student loans in the UK, yet the changes went ahead. The changes to NHS bursary funding resulted from the UK Government's desire for growth in student numbers (and ostensibly not growth in financial figures), and the fact that nursing (and other healthcare) students will become more fiscally indebted, despite society's moral obligation to them.
本文讨论了英国政府就国民保健制度助学金展开的公众咨询以及护理与助产士理事会的回应。一次公众咨询规定,国家现行的资金安排不在讨论范围内。相反,此次咨询只评估那些能成功引入国民保健制度职业教育学生贷款的观点。护士、助产士和护理专业学生的证词表明,他们担心新的资金安排让人难以承受、会产生抑制作用且偏向英国学生贷款的市场化,然而这些变革仍在推进。国民保健制度助学金资金的变化源于英国政府希望增加学生人数(表面上并非增加财政数字),以及护理(和其他医疗保健)专业学生将背负更多财政债务这一事实,尽管社会对他们负有道德义务。