• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模拟莫罗河盆地(多哥,西非)可持续景观管理情景对土壤侵蚀的响应。

Modelling soil erosion response to sustainable landscape management scenarios in the Mo River Basin (Togo, West Africa).

机构信息

WASCAL Program on Climate Change and Land Use, Department of Civil Engineering, KNUST, Kumasi, Ghana; Laboratory of Botany & Plant Ecology, University of Lomé, 01 PO Box: 1515 Lomé, Togo.

International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 950764, Amman 11195, Jordan; Program Management Unit (PMU), CGIAR Research Program on Dryland Systems(CRP-DS), c/o ICARDA, P.O. Box 950764, Amman 11195, Jordan.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:1309-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.228. Epub 2018 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.228
PMID:29996428
Abstract

The rural landscapes in Central Togo are experiencing severe land degradation, including soil erosion. However, spatially distributed information has scarcely been produced to identify the effects of landscape pattern dynamics on ecosystem services, especially the soil erosion control. In addition, relevant information for sustainable land and soil conservation is still lacking at watershed level. On this basis, using the LAndscape Management and Planning Tool for the Mo River basin (LAMPT_Mo), we (1) modelled soil erosion patterns in relation with land use/cover change (LUCC), land protection regime, and landforms, and (2) examined the efficiency of landscape redesign options on soil erosion amounts at basin scale. We found that Simulated historical net soil loss (NSL) for the Mo basin were approximately 26, 23, 27, and 44t/ha/yr, for 1972, 1987, 2000, and 2014, respectively. These simulated NSLs were higher than the tolerable soil loss limits for the Tropics. Steep slopes (≥15°), poorly covered lands (croplands and savannas), and riversides (distances ≤100m) are critical areas of sediment sources. The local appraisal of soil loss was in line with the simulated outputs even though quantification was not accounted for when dealing with rural illiterate people. Furthermore, results showed that the examined management measures, such as controlling the identified erosion hotspots through land protective measures, could help reduce the NSL up to 70%, to values closer to the tolerable limits for the Tropics. The model implementation in the basin showed insights for identifying erosion hotspots and targeting soil conservation planning and landscape restoration measures.

摘要

多哥中部的乡村景观正经历着严重的土地退化,包括土壤侵蚀。然而,几乎没有产生空间分布信息来识别景观格局动态对生态系统服务的影响,特别是对土壤侵蚀的控制。此外,在流域层面上,仍然缺乏有关可持续土地和土壤保护的相关信息。在此基础上,我们使用莫罗河流域景观管理和规划工具(LAMPT_Mo):(1)模拟了与土地利用/覆被变化(LUCC)、土地保护制度和地形有关的土壤侵蚀模式;(2)检验了流域尺度上景观重新设计方案对土壤侵蚀量的效率。我们发现,莫罗河流域模拟的历史净土壤流失(NSL)分别约为 1972 年、1987 年、2000 年和 2014 年的 26、23、27 和 44t/ha/yr。这些模拟的 NSL 高于热带地区可容忍的土壤流失限值。陡坡(≥15°)、植被覆盖不良的土地(耕地和热带稀树草原)和河流两岸(距离≤100m)是泥沙源的关键区域。尽管在处理农村文盲问题时没有考虑量化,但当地对土壤流失的评估与模拟结果一致。此外,结果表明,所检查的管理措施,如通过土地保护措施控制已确定的侵蚀热点,可以帮助将 NSL 减少多达 70%,使其更接近热带地区可容忍的限值。该模型在流域中的实施为识别侵蚀热点以及针对土壤保护规划和景观恢复措施提供了思路。

相似文献

1
Modelling soil erosion response to sustainable landscape management scenarios in the Mo River Basin (Togo, West Africa).模拟莫罗河盆地(多哥,西非)可持续景观管理情景对土壤侵蚀的响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 1;625:1309-1320. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.228. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
2
The influence of changes in land use and landscape patterns on soil erosion in a watershed.土地利用和景观格局变化对流域土壤侵蚀的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
Agroecology-based soil erosion assessment for better conservation planning in Ethiopian river basins.基于农业生态学的土壤侵蚀评估,以更好地进行埃塞俄比亚河流域的保护规划。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110786. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110786. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
4
Land use/land cover change effect on soil erosion and sediment delivery in the Winike watershed, Omo Gibe Basin, Ethiopia.土地利用/土地覆被变化对埃塞俄比亚奥莫河吉贝流域威尼凯流域土壤侵蚀和泥沙输送的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138776. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138776. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
5
[Effects of sub-watershed landscape patterns at the upper reaches of Minjiang River on soil erosion].岷江上游小流域景观格局对土壤侵蚀的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2007 Nov;18(11):2512-9.
6
Determination of soil erosion risk in the Mustafakemalpasa River Basin, Turkey, using the revised universal soil loss equation, geographic information system, and remote sensing.利用修正后的通用土壤流失方程、地理信息系统和遥感技术,对土耳其 Mustafakemalpasa 河流域的土壤侵蚀风险进行了测定。
Environ Manage. 2012 Oct;50(4):679-94. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9904-8. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
7
Assessing soil erosion risk in a peri-urban catchment of the Lake Victoria basin.评估维多利亚湖流域城郊集水区的土壤侵蚀风险。
Model Earth Syst Environ. 2023;9(2):1633-1649. doi: 10.1007/s40808-022-01565-6. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
8
The impact of land use and land cover (LULC) dynamics on soil erosion and sediment yield in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚土地利用和土地覆盖(LULC)动态变化对土壤侵蚀和产沙量的影响。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 16;5(12):e02981. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02981. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Soil erosion risk assessment and treatment priority classification: A case study on guder watersheds, Abay river basin, Oromia, Ethiopia.土壤侵蚀风险评估与治理优先级分类:以埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚阿巴伊河流域古德河流域为例
Heliyon. 2022 Aug 10;8(8):e10183. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10183. eCollection 2022 Aug.
10
Dynamics of Soil Erosion as Influenced by Watershed Management Practices: A Case Study of the Agula Watershed in the Semi-Arid Highlands of Northern Ethiopia.流域管理措施对土壤侵蚀动态的影响:以埃塞俄比亚北部半干旱高地的阿古拉流域为例
Environ Manage. 2016 Nov;58(5):889-905. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0757-4. Epub 2016 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the relationship between soil erosion and landscape metrics across Gorgan Watershed in northern Iran.评价伊朗北部戈尔甘流域土壤侵蚀与景观格局指标之间的关系。
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Oct 18;190(11):643. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7040-5.