• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大多数患有银屑病关节炎的患者不符合随机临床试验的条件。

The majority of patients with psoriatic arthritis are not eligible for randomised clinical trials.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Iceland and Hospital Pharmacy, The University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Nov-Dec;36(6):1068-1073. Epub 2018 Jun 14.

PMID:29998835
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To identify the proportion of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) who would meet inclusion criteria of the randomised clinical trials that were performed leading up to registration of the tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi).

METHODS

Data from 329 patients with PsA were obtained from an Icelandic database, ICEBIO, medical records at the University Hospital of Iceland, and the private out-patient clinic Laeknasetrid Ltd. The patients were classified according to whether they met the inclusion criteria of the clinical trials that were performed ahead of the registration of each respective TNFi. The reasons for exclusion were also explored.

RESULTS

34% of the patients with complete data available met the inclusion criteria. Clinical data in respect to exclusion and inclusion criteria were incomplete for 13% of the cases. The proportion of patients who met the inclusion criteria was highest among those who received adalimumab and etanercept (53%). Patients who received in iximab had the lowest inclusion rate (23%). The main reason why patients did not meet the inclusion criteria was too few swollen and/or tender joints, or in 45% of excluded cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that two thirds of patients with PsA in Iceland who are treated with TNFi would not have qualified for the randomised clinical trials performed leading up to the registration of the medications. Further studies with regards to whether outcomes are different between those who met the inclusion criteria and those who did not remain to be performed.

摘要

目的

确定符合 TNF 抑制剂(TNFi)注册前开展的随机临床试验纳入标准的银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者比例。

方法

从冰岛 ICEBIO 数据库、冰岛大学医院病历和私人门诊 Laeknasetrid Ltd. 获取了 329 例 PsA 患者的数据。根据患者是否符合每种 TNFi 注册前开展的临床试验的纳入标准对其进行分类。还探讨了排除的原因。

结果

34%的患者具有可用的完整数据,符合纳入标准。13%的病例在排除和纳入标准方面的临床数据不完整。接受阿达木单抗和依那西普的患者符合纳入标准的比例最高(53%)。接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的患者纳入率最低(23%)。患者不符合纳入标准的主要原因是关节肿胀和/或压痛的关节数太少,在 45%的排除病例中都是这种情况。

结论

我们的结果表明,冰岛接受 TNFi 治疗的 PsA 患者中有三分之二不符合药物注册前开展的随机临床试验的纳入标准。需要进一步研究符合纳入标准和不符合纳入标准的患者之间的结局是否存在差异。

相似文献

1
The majority of patients with psoriatic arthritis are not eligible for randomised clinical trials.大多数患有银屑病关节炎的患者不符合随机临床试验的条件。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018 Nov-Dec;36(6):1068-1073. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
2
The influence of obesity on response to tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: results from the DANBIO and ICEBIO registries.肥胖对银屑病关节炎患者肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂反应的影响:来自丹麦生物制剂注册研究(DANBIO)和冰岛生物制剂注册研究(ICEBIO)的结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Dec;55(12):2191-2199. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew326. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
3
Patients with psoriatic arthritis who are not eligible for randomised controlled trials for TNF inhibitors have treatment response and drug survival similar to those who are eligible.不符合 TNF 抑制剂随机对照试验条件的银屑病关节炎患者的治疗反应和药物存活率与符合条件的患者相似。
RMD Open. 2019 Jul 16;5(2):e000984. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000984. eCollection 2019.
4
Real-life 10-year retention rate of first-line anti-TNF drugs for inflammatory arthritides in adult- and juvenile-onset populations: similarities and differences.一线抗TNF药物在成人和青少年发病的炎症性关节炎患者中的真实世界10年保留率:异同点
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Aug;36(8):1747-1755. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3712-8. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Risks and benefits of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in the management of psoriatic arthritis: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.肿瘤坏死因子-α抑制剂治疗银屑病关节炎的风险与获益:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Rheumatol. 2008 May;35(5):883-90. Epub 2008 Mar 15.
6
Role of Agents other than Tumor Necrosis Factor Blockers in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.肿瘤坏死因子阻滞剂以外的药物在银屑病关节炎治疗中的作用
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2015 Nov;93:79-81. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150643.
7
Singapore Chapter of Rheumatologists consensus statement on the eligibility for government subsidy of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic agents for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis.新加坡风湿病学家分会关于治疗银屑病关节炎的生物改善病情抗风湿药政府补贴资格的共识声明
Int J Rheum Dis. 2017 Oct;20(10):1527-1540. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12685. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
8
New Approaches in Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonism for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Certolizumab Pegol.肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂治疗银屑病关节炎的新方法:聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗
J Rheumatol Suppl. 2015 Nov;93:70-2. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150641.
9
Impact of Comorbidities on Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Therapy in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study.合并症对银屑病关节炎肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的影响:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Apr;70(4):592-599. doi: 10.1002/acr.23333. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
10
[Screening for tuberculosis before TNFα treatment in routine rheumatic care in Iceland. Result from the nationwide ICEBIO registry].[冰岛常规风湿治疗中TNFα治疗前的结核病筛查。来自全国性ICEBIO登记处的结果]
Laeknabladid. 2018;104(5):231-235. doi: 10.17992/lbl.2018.05.184.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the risk of infection higher during treatment with secukinumab than with TNF inhibitors? An observational study from the Nordic countries.使用司库奇尤单抗治疗的感染风险是否高于使用 TNF 抑制剂?来自北欧国家的观察性研究。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Feb 1;62(2):647-658. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac358.
2
Patients with psoriatic arthritis who are not eligible for randomised controlled trials for TNF inhibitors have treatment response and drug survival similar to those who are eligible.不符合 TNF 抑制剂随机对照试验条件的银屑病关节炎患者的治疗反应和药物存活率与符合条件的患者相似。
RMD Open. 2019 Jul 16;5(2):e000984. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-000984. eCollection 2019.