Ferraz Erika, Gonçalves Thais Dos Santos, Freire Thais, Mattar Tais de Lima Ferreira, Lamônica Dionísia Aparecida Cusin, Maximino Luciana Paula, Abreu Pinheiro Crenitte Patrícia
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2018;70(2):59-73. doi: 10.1159/000489091. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
To determine the effects of a phonological remediation reading and writing program in individuals with dyslexia, through behavioral and objective evaluations.
Twenty children diagnosed with dyslexia, aged 8-14 years, were included in this study. Group I (GI) was composed of 10 children who took part in the program, and group II (GII) consisted of 10 subjects who did not take the remediation. The pre-testing evaluated phonological awareness, rapid naming, working memory, reading and writing of words and nonwords, thematic writing, and auditory evoked potential - P300. The type of stimulus used was the speech (20% of rare stimulus and 80% of frequent stimulus), intensity of 80 dBNa. The rare stimulus was the syllable /da/, and the frequent stimulus was the syllable /ba/. Next, the Phonological Reading and Writing Remediation Program was applied in 24 cumulative sessions, twice a week, each with a duration of 30 min. In the post-testing (at the end of the program), all the tests of the pre-testing were reapplied.
There was a statistically significant difference (between pre- and post-testing) in phonological awareness, rapid naming, working memory, thematic writing, writing and reading words and nonwords, as well as in the latency of the P3 component of P300 in GI, while GII maintained the same difficulties.
The phonological remediation program showed to be a therapeutic method of fast beneficial effects in written language of individuals with dyslexia. However, the wide age range and the size of the sample could be considered a limitation of this study - it interferes with the generalization of results.
通过行为学和客观评估,确定语音矫正读写项目对诵读困难个体的影响。
本研究纳入了20名年龄在8至14岁之间被诊断为诵读困难的儿童。第一组(GI)由10名参与该项目的儿童组成,第二组(GII)由10名未接受矫正的受试者组成。预测试评估了语音意识、快速命名、工作记忆、单词和非单词的读写、主题写作以及听觉诱发电位 - P300。使用的刺激类型为语音(20%为罕见刺激,80%为频繁刺激),强度为80 dBNa。罕见刺激为音节/da/,频繁刺激为音节/ba/。接下来,语音读写矫正项目以每周两次、每次30分钟的频率进行了24次累积课程。在测试后(项目结束时),重新进行了所有预测试中的测试。
GI组在语音意识、快速命名、工作记忆、主题写作、单词和非单词的读写以及P300的P3成分潜伏期方面,测试前后存在统计学显著差异,而GII组仍存在相同的困难。
语音矫正项目显示出对诵读困难个体的书面语言具有快速有益效果的治疗方法。然而,较宽的年龄范围和样本量可被视为本研究的局限性 - 这会干扰结果的推广。