Suppr超能文献

旨在降低剖宫产率的组织干预措施:一项系统评价方案

Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Hutchinson Alison M, Nagle Cate, Kent Bridie, Bick Debra, Lindberg Rebecca

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Deakin Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 12;8(7):e021120. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021120.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is a growing body of evidence to indicate that both primary and subsequent caesarean sections are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity. Efforts to reduce the number of clinically unnecessary caesarean sections are urgently required. Our objective is to systematically review published evidence on the effectiveness of maternity service organisational interventions, such as models of maternity care, that aim to reduce caesarean section rates.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Databases will be searched, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Maternity and Infant Care, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Search terms related to caesarean section and organisational intervention will be used. Research published before 1980 will be excluded and only randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials, controlled before and after studies and interrupted time series studies will be included. Data extraction and quality assessments will be undertaken by two authors.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review. The results of this study will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and presentation at professional conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016039458.

摘要

引言

越来越多的证据表明,初产妇剖宫产和再次剖宫产均与孕产妇及围产儿发病率增加相关。迫切需要努力减少临床上不必要的剖宫产数量。我们的目标是系统评价已发表的关于旨在降低剖宫产率的产科服务组织干预措施(如产科护理模式)有效性的证据。

方法与分析

将检索多个数据库,包括Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、医学索引、母婴护理、荷兰医学文摘数据库和Scopus数据库。将使用与剖宫产和组织干预相关的检索词。排除1980年以前发表的研究,仅纳入随机对照试验、整群随机对照试验、半随机对照试验、前后对照研究和中断时间序列研究。由两位作者进行数据提取和质量评估。

伦理与传播

本系统评价无需伦理批准。本研究结果将通过同行评审发表以及在专业会议上报告的方式进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42016039458。

相似文献

3
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.剖宫产率回顾:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015 Mar 1;15(9):1-58. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

3
WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates.世界卫生组织关于剖宫产率的声明。
BJOG. 2016 Apr;123(5):667-70. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13526. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.安全预防初次剖宫产。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar;210(3):179-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026.
10
An overview of the health economic implications of elective caesarean section.择期剖宫产的健康经济学影响概述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):561-76. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0063-8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验