• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative out-of-hospital mortality of long-acting opioids prescribed for non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.长时效阿片类药物用于非癌性疼痛治疗的院外死亡率比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/pds.4619. Epub 2018 Jul 12.
2
Prescription of Long-Acting Opioids and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.长效阿片类药物处方与慢性非癌性疼痛患者的死亡率
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2415-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7789.
3
Therapy switching in patients receiving long-acting opioids.接受长效阿片类药物治疗的患者的治疗转换
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Mar;38(3):389-95. doi: 10.1345/aph.1D109. Epub 2004 Jan 12.
4
Incidence of constipation associated with long-acting opioid therapy: a comparative study.长效阿片类药物治疗相关便秘的发生率:一项对比研究。
South Med J. 2004 Feb;97(2):129-34. doi: 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000109215.54052.D8.
5
Opioids and the management of chronic severe pain in the elderly: consensus statement of an International Expert Panel with focus on the six clinically most often used World Health Organization Step III opioids (buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, methadone, morphine, oxycodone).阿片类药物与老年人慢性重度疼痛的管理:一个国际专家小组的共识声明,重点关注世界卫生组织第三阶梯临床最常用的六种阿片类药物(丁丙诺啡、芬太尼、氢吗啡酮、美沙酮、吗啡、羟考酮)。
Pain Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;8(4):287-313. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00204.x. Epub 2008 May 23.
6
New Initiation of Long-Acting Opioids in Long-Stay Nursing Home Residents.长期居住在养老院的居民中长效阿片类药物的新启用情况。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1772-8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14306. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
A comparison of the resources used in advanced cancer care between two different strong opioids: an analysis of naturalistic practice in the UK.两种不同强效阿片类药物在晚期癌症护理中资源使用情况的比较:英国自然主义实践分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Feb;21(2):271-80. doi: 10.1185/030079904X20312.
8
Comparison of the Quality of Life of Cancer Patients with Pain Treated with Oral Controlled-Release Morphine and Oxycodone and Transdermal Buprenorphine and Fentanyl.口服控释吗啡和羟考酮与透皮丁丙诺啡和芬太尼治疗癌痛患者生活质量的比较。
Curr Pharm Des. 2019;25(30):3216-3224. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190717091230.
9
Patient-reported utilization patterns of fentanyl transdermal system and oxycodone hydrochloride controlled-release among patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.慢性非恶性疼痛患者中芬太尼透皮系统和盐酸羟考酮控释片的患者报告使用模式。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):223-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2003.9.3.223.
10
Prescription of opioid analgesics and related harms in Australia.澳大利亚阿片类镇痛药处方及相关危害
Med J Aust. 2011 Sep 5;195(5):280-4. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11450.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of fatal and nonfatal overdose after prescription of opioids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.预测慢性疼痛患者处方阿片类药物后致死和非致死性药物过量的因素:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
CMAJ. 2023 Oct 23;195(41):E1399-E1411. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.230459.
2
Endogenous opioid systems alterations in pain and opioid use disorder.疼痛与阿片类物质使用障碍中的内源性阿片系统改变
Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Oct 19;16:1014768. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1014768. eCollection 2022.
3
Less Well-Known Consequences of the Long-Term Use of Opioid Analgesics: A Comprehensive Literature Review.长期使用阿片类镇痛药的不那么为人知的后果:全面文献综述。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Jan 18;16:251-264. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S342409. eCollection 2022.
4
Both Race and Insurance Type Independently Predict the Selection of Oral Opioids Prescribed to Cancer Outpatients.种族和保险类型均可独立预测癌症门诊患者口服阿片类药物的处方选择。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2020 Feb;21(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Sep 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescription of Long-Acting Opioids and Mortality in Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain.长效阿片类药物处方与慢性非癌性疼痛患者的死亡率
JAMA. 2016 Jun 14;315(22):2415-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7789.
2
Trends in long-term opioid prescribing in primary care patients with musculoskeletal conditions: an observational database study.肌肉骨骼疾病初级护理患者长期阿片类药物处方趋势:一项观察性数据库研究。
Pain. 2016 Jul;157(7):1525-1531. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000557.
3
Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths--United States, 2000-2014.药物和阿片类药物过量死亡人数增加 - 美国,2000-2014 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Jan 1;64(50-51):1378-82. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3.
4
The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.长期阿片类药物治疗慢性疼痛的效果和风险:美国国立卫生研究院预防途径研讨会的系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 17;162(4):276-86. doi: 10.7326/M14-2559.
5
Prescription opioid use among disabled Medicare beneficiaries: intensity, trends, and regional variation.残疾医疗保险受益人中处方阿片类药物的使用情况:强度、趋势及地区差异。
Med Care. 2014 Sep;52(9):852-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000183.
6
Chronic pain, opioid prescriptions, and mortality in Denmark: A population-based cohort study.丹麦的慢性疼痛、阿片类药物处方与死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Pain. 2014 Dec;155(12):2486-2490. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 11.
7
Changes in trends and pattern of strong opioid prescribing in primary care.基层医疗中强效阿片类药物处方的趋势和模式变化。
Eur J Pain. 2014 Oct;18(9):1343-51. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2014.496.x. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
8
Prevention of fatal opioid overdose.预防致命性阿片类药物过量。
JAMA. 2012 Nov 14;308(18):1863-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14205.
9
Pharmacokinetics of non-intravenous formulations of fentanyl.芬太尼非胃肠外制剂的药代动力学。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2013 Jan;52(1):23-36. doi: 10.1007/s40262-012-0016-7.
10
Rational use of opioids for management of chronic nonterminal pain.慢性非终末期疼痛的阿片类药物合理使用。
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Aug 1;86(3):252-8.

长时效阿片类药物用于非癌性疼痛治疗的院外死亡率比较:一项回顾性队列研究。

Comparative out-of-hospital mortality of long-acting opioids prescribed for non-cancer pain: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Pharmacology (CPC, KTM, CMS), Biostatistics (WDD), and Health Policy (KH, WAR), Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.1002/pds.4619. Epub 2018 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1002/pds.4619
PMID:30003613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6330158/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite significant growth of opioid prescriptions, only limited data are available regarding the comparative safety of long-acting opioids for chronic non-cancer pain. Recent data suggest that transdermal fentanyl and oxycodone CR may have greater toxicity than morphine SR in patients with non-cancer pain. Thus, we compared the risk of out-of-hospital deaths in patients with non-cancer pain filling prescriptions for transdermal fentanyl or oxycodone CR with that for morphine SR.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 50 658 patients enrolled in Tennessee Medicaid who filled prescriptions for transdermal fentanyl (n = 8717), oxycodone CR (n = 14 118), or morphine SR (n = 27 823) between 1999 and 2011. We excluded individuals with cancer or other life-threatening diagnoses and used propensity scores to adjust for multiple potential confounders. The primary outcome was out-of-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

During 44 385 person-years of follow-up, 689 patients died. The out-of-hospital mortality rate among all study subjects was 155/10 000 patient-years. Contrary to earlier data suggesting greater risk, mortality was not significantly different in patients filling prescriptions for transdermal fentanyl compared with morphine SR (adjusted HR = 0.96, 95% C.I.: 0.77-1.21); moreover, patients filling prescriptions for oxycodone CR had lower mortality risk compared with those filling prescriptions for morphine SR (adjusted HR = 0.79, 95% C.I. 0.66-0.95).

CONCLUSION

In the study population, long-acting opioids for non-cancer pain were associated with high out-of-hospital mortality rates. We found comparable out-of-hospital mortality risks associated with transdermal fentanyl and morphine SR. The risk of out-of-hospital death for oxycodone CR was lower than that for morphine SR.

摘要

目的

尽管阿片类药物处方量显著增加,但关于长期阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌痛的相对安全性的数据仍十分有限。最近的数据表明,对于患有非癌痛的患者,透皮芬太尼和羟考酮控释剂的毒性可能大于吗啡控释剂。因此,我们比较了患有非癌痛的患者使用透皮芬太尼或羟考酮控释剂与使用吗啡控释剂处方的院外死亡率。

方法

我们对田纳西州医疗补助计划中 50658 名患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者在 1999 年至 2011 年期间服用了透皮芬太尼(n=8717)、羟考酮控释剂(n=14118)或吗啡控释剂(n=27823)。我们排除了患有癌症或其他危及生命的诊断的患者,并使用倾向评分来调整多种潜在混杂因素。主要结局是院外死亡率。

结果

在 44385 人年的随访期间,有 689 名患者死亡。所有研究对象的院外死亡率为 155/10000 人年。与早期数据表明的更高风险相反,与使用吗啡控释剂相比,使用透皮芬太尼处方的患者的死亡率并无显著差异(调整后的 HR=0.96,95%CI:0.77-1.21);此外,与使用吗啡控释剂处方的患者相比,使用羟考酮控释剂处方的患者的死亡率风险更低(调整后的 HR=0.79,95%CI:0.66-0.95)。

结论

在研究人群中,用于非癌痛的长效阿片类药物与高院外死亡率相关。我们发现,与透皮芬太尼和吗啡控释剂相比,院外死亡率的风险相当。羟考酮控释剂的院外死亡风险低于吗啡控释剂。