• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道间质瘤的对比研究:一项回顾性研究。

A comparative study of treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective study.

作者信息

He Bin, Yan Su, Li Rui, Qiu Hongqing, Tu Jianchen

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

J BUON. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):820-825.

PMID:30003757
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy and complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and laparoscopic resection of stromal tumors, and to explore the clinical value and complications of stromal tumors treated with ESD.

METHODS

146 patients with gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) treated in our hospital from January 2012 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the ESD group and the laparoscopic surgery group (LS). The operation time, postoperative recovery time of diet, postoperative exhaust time, etc were observed and analyzed. All the measurement indexes were described as mean ± standard deviation. The t-test of two independent samples was used for the hypothesis test. Chi-square test was used for comparison of the percent data between the two groups and p<0.05 indicated significant difference.

RESULTS

The postoperative diet recovery time, postoperative exhaust time, hospital stay and hospitalization cost of the ESD group were better compared with the LS group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in operative time between the ESD and LS group (p>0.05), while the operation time in ESD group was longer than in the LS group (p<0.05). The operation time of gastric body and antrum stromal tumors was shorter than in the ESD group group (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in tumor diameter, mitotic number and Flether classification between the groups (p>0.05). No significant difference in the incidence of postoperative bleeding, incision infection and recurrence rate was noticeable between the groups (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment of GSTs is safe and feasible, and may be better than laparoscopic resection.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)和腹腔镜切除胃间质瘤的临床疗效及并发症,并探讨ESD治疗胃间质瘤的临床价值及并发症。

方法

回顾性分析2012年1月至2016年1月在我院接受治疗的146例胃间质瘤(GST)患者。将患者分为ESD组和腹腔镜手术组(LS)。观察并分析手术时间、术后饮食恢复时间、术后排气时间等。所有测量指标均以均值±标准差表示。采用两独立样本t检验进行假设检验。采用卡方检验比较两组间的百分比数据,p<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。

结果

ESD组术后饮食恢复时间、术后排气时间、住院时间和住院费用均优于LS组(p<0.001)。ESD组与LS组手术时间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05),但ESD组手术时间长于LS组(p<0.05)。胃体和胃窦间质瘤的手术时间短于ESD组(p<0.05)。两组间肿瘤直径、核分裂象数和弗莱彻分类差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。两组术后出血、切口感染发生率及复发率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

内镜治疗GSTs安全可行,可能优于腹腔镜切除术。

相似文献

1
A comparative study of treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective study.腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道间质瘤的对比研究:一项回顾性研究。
J BUON. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):820-825.
2
Safety analysis of laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for selected gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜内镜联合手术与内镜下黏膜下剥离术治疗特定胃胃肠道间质瘤的安全性分析:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):843-851. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5042-3. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
3
Comparison of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for the treatment of gastric submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer: a single-center study (with video).内镜黏膜下剥离术与手术治疗源于固有肌层的胃黏膜下肿瘤的比较:一项单中心研究(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):5099-5107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4860-7. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
4
Endoscopic band ligation versus endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic resection for small gastric stromal tumors.内镜下套扎术与内镜黏膜下剥离术及腹腔镜切除术治疗小胃间质瘤的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2873-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4571-5. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
5
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic resection for gastric stromal tumors less than 2 cm.内镜黏膜下剥离术与腹腔镜切除术治疗直径小于2厘米胃间质瘤的长期疗效比较
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct;32(10):1693-1697. doi: 10.1111/jgh.13768.
6
Comparison Analysis of Three Different Types of Minimally Invasive Procedures for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ≤5 cm.三种不同类型的微创程序用于治疗直径≤5厘米的胃肠道间质瘤的对比分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):58-64. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0305. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
7
[Efficacy comparison between surgical resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer in a domestic single center].[国内单中心早期胃癌手术切除与内镜黏膜下剥离术的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):190-195.
8
Comparison of treatment outcomes between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgeries for relatively small gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.腹腔镜手术与内镜手术治疗相对较小胃胃肠道间质瘤的疗效比较。
Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;27(4):737-742. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
[Comparison of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic wedge resection and open wedge resection for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor].腹腔镜楔形切除术与开放楔形切除术治疗胃肠道间质瘤的临床疗效比较
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2016 Jul;38(7):543-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2016.07.012.
10
Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic open resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.腹腔镜与开放手术切除胃胃肠道间质瘤的短期和长期结果比较
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul 7;23(25):4595-4603. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i25.4595.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Subepithelial Lesions Observed in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.上消化道内镜检查中观察到的上皮下病变的诊断和治疗实践指南。
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2025 Sep;25(3):234-250. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2025.0020. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Endoscopic Resection Versus Laparoscopic Resection for Gastric Submucosal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Safety and Efficacy.胃黏膜下肿瘤的内镜切除术与腹腔镜切除术:安全性和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70104. doi: 10.1111/ases.70104.
3
Endoscopic full-thickness resection surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching.
内镜全层切除术与胃间质瘤手术切除:使用倾向评分匹配法评估疗效与安全性
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):101002. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002.
4
Comparison of efficacy and safety between endoscopic and laparoscopic resections in the treatment of gastric stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜切除术与腹腔镜切除术治疗胃间质瘤的疗效及安全性比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022 Dec;13(6):2863-2873. doi: 10.21037/jgo-22-1121.
5
Lap-Endo cooperative surgery (LECS) in gastric GIST: updates and future advances.腹腔镜辅助内镜下胃 GIST 手术:最新进展与未来展望。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1672-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09691-z. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
6
Comparative Study on the Clinical Effects of Different Surgical Methods in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.不同手术方法治疗胃肠道间质瘤的临床效果比较研究
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Jul 21;2022:1280756. doi: 10.1155/2022/1280756. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparable long-term survival of patients with colorectal or gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors treated with endoscopic vs. surgical resection.内镜与手术切除治疗结直肠或胃胃肠道间质瘤患者的长期生存情况相当。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4215-4225. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08755-w. Epub 2021 Oct 7.