ThekkePurakkal Akhil Soman, Naimi Ashley I, Madathil Sreenath A, Kumamangalam Puthiyannal Shahul H, Netuveli Gopalakrishnan, Sacker Amanda, Schlecht Nicolas F, Nicolau Belinda
Division of Oral Health and Society, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;46(6):592-600. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12404. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
The incidence of oral cancer has been rapidly increasing in India, calling for evidence contributing to a deeper understanding of its determinants. Although disadvantageous life-course socioeconomic position (SEP) is independently associated with the risk of these cancers, the explanatory mechanisms remain unclear. Possible pathways may be better understood by testing which life-course model most influences oral cancer risk. We estimated the association between life-course SEP and oral cancer risk under three life-course models: critical period, accumulation and social mobility.
We recruited incident oral cancer cases (N = 350) and controls (N = 371) frequency-matched by age and sex from two main referral hospitals in Kozhikode, Kerala, India, between 2008 and 2012. We collected information on childhood (0-16 years), early adulthood (17-30 years) and late adulthood (above 30 years) SEP and behavioural factors along the life span using interviews and a life-grid technique. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for the association between life-course SEP and oral cancer risk using inverse probability weighted marginal structural models.
Relative to an advantageous SEP in childhood and early adulthood, a disadvantageous SEP was associated with oral cancer risk [(OR = 2.76, 95% CI: 1.99, 3.81) and (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.21, 2.79), respectively]. In addition, participants who were in a disadvantageous (vs advantageous) SEP during all three periods of life had an increased oral cancer risk (OR = 4.86, 95% CI: 2.61, 9.06). The childhood to early adulthood social mobility model and overall life-course trajectories indicated strong influence of exposure to disadvantageous SEP in childhood on the risk for oral cancer.
Using novel approaches to existing methods, our study provides empirical evidence that disadvantageous childhood SEP is critical for oral cancer risk in this population from Kerala, India.
口腔癌在印度的发病率一直在迅速上升,这就需要有证据来更深入地了解其决定因素。尽管不利的生命历程社会经济地位(SEP)与这些癌症的风险独立相关,但其解释机制仍不清楚。通过测试哪种生命历程模型对口腔癌风险影响最大,可能会更好地理解潜在途径。我们在三种生命历程模型下估计了生命历程SEP与口腔癌风险之间的关联:关键期、累积和社会流动。
2008年至2012年期间,我们从印度喀拉拉邦科泽科德的两家主要转诊医院招募了按年龄和性别频率匹配的口腔癌新发病例(N = 350)和对照(N = 371)。我们通过访谈和生命网格技术收集了关于童年(0至16岁)、成年早期(17至30岁)和成年晚期(30岁以上)SEP以及整个生命跨度中的行为因素的信息。使用逆概率加权边际结构模型估计生命历程SEP与口腔癌风险之间关联的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
相对于童年和成年早期的有利SEP,不利SEP与口腔癌风险相关[分别为(OR = 2.76,95% CI:1.99,3.81)和(OR = 1.84,95% CI:1.21,2.79)]。此外,在生命的所有三个时期都处于不利(相对于有利)SEP的参与者患口腔癌的风险增加(OR = 4.86,95% CI:2.61,9.06)。童年到成年早期的社会流动模型和整个生命历程轨迹表明,童年时期暴露于不利SEP对口腔癌风险有强烈影响。
通过对现有方法采用新方法,我们的研究提供了实证证据,表明不利的童年SEP对印度喀拉拉邦这一人群的口腔癌风险至关重要。