Suppr超能文献

不同 3D 打印可吸收材料的比较:体外生物相容性、体外降解率和细胞分化支持。

Comparison of different three dimensional-printed resorbable materials: In vitro biocompatibility, In vitro degradation rate, and cell differentiation support.

机构信息

1 Institute of Technical Chemistry, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover, Germany.

2 Institute of Brewing and Beverage Technology, Forschungszentrum Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Germany.

出版信息

J Biomater Appl. 2018 Aug;33(2):281-294. doi: 10.1177/0885328218787219. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

Abstract

Biodegradable materials play a crucial role in both material and medical sciences and are frequently used as a primary commodity for implants generation. Due to their material inherent properties, they are supposed to be entirely resorbed by the patients' body after fulfilling their task as a scaffold. This makes a second intervention (e.g. for implant removal) redundant and significantly enhances a patient's post-operative life quality. At the moment, materials for resorbable and biodegradable implants (e.g. polylactic acid or poly-caprolactone polymers) are still intensively studied. They are able to provide mandatory demands such as mechanical strength and attributes needed for high-quality implants. Implants, however, not only need to be made of adequate material, but must also to be personalized in order to meet the customers' needs. Combining three dimensional-printing and high-resolution imaging technologies a new age of implant production comes into sight. Three dimensional images (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) of tissue defects can be utilized as digital blueprints for personalized implants. Modern additive manufacturing devices are able to use a variety of materials to fabricate custom parts within short periods of time. The combination of high-quality resorbable materials and personalized three dimensional-printing for the custom application will provide the patients with the best suitable and sustainable implants. In this study, we evaluated and compared four resorbable and three dimensional printable materials for their in vitro biocompatibility, in vitro rate of degradation, cell adherence and behavior on these materials as well as support of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. The tests were conducted with model constructs of 1 cm surface area fabricated with fused deposition modeling three dimensional-printing technology.

摘要

可生物降解材料在材料科学和医学领域都起着至关重要的作用,并且经常被用作植入物生成的主要原料。由于其材料固有特性,它们应该在完成支架任务后被患者的身体完全吸收。这使得第二次干预(例如植入物去除)变得多余,并显著提高了患者的术后生活质量。目前,可吸收和可生物降解植入物的材料(例如聚乳酸或聚己内酯聚合物)仍在深入研究中。它们能够提供必要的机械强度和高质量植入物所需的属性。然而,植入物不仅需要由合适的材料制成,还必须进行个性化设计,以满足客户的需求。结合三维打印和高分辨率成像技术,植入物生产迎来了新时代。组织缺陷的三维图像(例如磁共振成像或计算机断层扫描)可以用作个性化植入物的数字蓝图。现代增材制造设备能够使用多种材料在短时间内制造定制部件。高质量可吸收材料与定制三维打印的结合将为患者提供最合适和可持续的植入物。在这项研究中,我们评估和比较了四种可生物降解和可三维打印的材料,以评估它们的体外生物相容性、体外降解率、细胞黏附性和在这些材料上的行为以及对人脂肪组织来源间充质干细胞成骨分化的支持作用。这些测试是使用熔融沉积建模三维打印技术制造的 1 平方厘米表面积的模型构建体进行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验