1Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul.
3Department of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
J Neurosurg. 2019 Jun 1;130(6):2063-2070. doi: 10.3171/2018.4.JNS1891. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
OBJECTIVEDe novo seizure following craniotomy (DSC) for nontraumatic pathology may adversely affect medical and neurological outcomes in patients with no history of seizures who have undergone craniotomies. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are commonly used prophylactically in patients undergoing craniotomy; however, evidence supporting this practice is limited and mixed. The authors aimed to collate the available evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam monotherapy and compare it with that of the classic AED, phenytoin, for DSC.METHODSPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that compared levetiracetam with phenytoin for DSC prevention. Inclusion criteria were adult patients with no history of epilepsy who underwent craniotomy with prophylactic usage of phenytoin, a comparator group with levetiracetam treatment as the main treatment difference between the two groups, and availability of data on the numbers of patients and seizures for each group. Patients with brain injury and previous seizure history were excluded. DSC occurrence and adverse drug reaction (ADR) were evaluated. Seizure occurrence was calculated using the Peto odds ratio (POR), which is the relative effect estimation method of choice for binary data with rare events.RESULTSData from 7 studies involving 803 patients were included. The DSC occurrence rate was 1.26% (4/318) in the levetiracetam cohort and 6.60% (32/485) in the phenytoin cohort. Meta-analysis showed that levetiracetam is significantly superior to phenytoin for DSC prevention (POR 0.233, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.117-0.462, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that levetiracetam is superior to phenytoin for DSC due to all brain diseases (POR 0.129, 95% CI 0.039-0.423, p = 0.001) and tumor (POR 0.282, 95% CI 0.117-0.678, p = 0.005). ADRs in the levetiracetam group were cognitive disturbance, thrombophlebitis, irritability, lethargy, tiredness, and asthenia, whereas rash, anaphylaxis, arrhythmia, and hyponatremia were more common in the phenytoin group. The overall occurrence of ADR in the phenytoin (34/466) and levetiracetam (26/432) groups (p = 0.44) demonstrated no statistically significant difference in ADR occurrence. However, the discontinuation rate of AEDs due to ADR was 53/297 in the phenytoin group and 6/196 in the levetiracetam group (POR 0.266, 95% CI 0.137-0.518, p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSLevetiracetam is superior to phenytoin for DSC prevention for nontraumatic pathology and has fewer serious ADRs that lead to discontinuation. Further high-quality studies that compare levetiracetam with placebo are necessary to provide evidence for establishing AED guidelines.
对于无癫痫病史且已行开颅手术的患者,非创伤性病变术后新发癫痫(DSC)可能对其医疗和神经预后产生不利影响。抗癫痫药物(AEDs)常用于行开颅手术的患者以预防 DSC;然而,支持这一做法的证据有限且存在差异。作者旨在整理关于左乙拉西坦单药治疗 DSC 的疗效和耐受性的现有证据,并将其与经典 AED 苯妥英进行比较。
检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 图书馆中比较左乙拉西坦与苯妥英预防 DSC 的研究。纳入标准为无癫痫病史且行开颅术并预防性使用苯妥英的成年患者、两组之间的主要治疗差异是左乙拉西坦治疗的对照组以及每组患者的人数和癫痫发作数据。排除脑损伤和既往癫痫发作史的患者。评估 DSC 发生和药物不良反应(ADR)。采用 Peto 比值比(POR)评估癫痫发作发生率,POR 是用于罕见事件的二元数据的首选相对效应估计方法。
纳入了 7 项涉及 803 例患者的研究。左乙拉西坦组的 DSC 发生率为 1.26%(4/318),苯妥英组为 6.60%(32/485)。Meta 分析表明,左乙拉西坦在预防 DSC 方面明显优于苯妥英(POR 0.233,95%置信区间 [CI] 0.117-0.462,p < 0.001)。亚组分析表明,左乙拉西坦由于所有脑部疾病(POR 0.129,95%CI 0.039-0.423,p = 0.001)和肿瘤(POR 0.282,95%CI 0.117-0.678,p = 0.005)而优于苯妥英。左乙拉西坦组的 ADR 为认知障碍、血栓性静脉炎、易激惹、昏睡、疲劳和乏力,而皮疹、过敏反应、心律失常和低钠血症在苯妥英组更为常见。苯妥英(34/466)和左乙拉西坦(26/432)组 ADR 的总体发生率(p = 0.44)表明 ADR 发生率无统计学差异。然而,由于 ADR 而停用 AED 的比例在苯妥英组为 53/297,在左乙拉西坦组为 6/196(POR 0.266,95%CI 0.137-0.518,p < 0.001)。
左乙拉西坦在预防非创伤性病变术后 DSC 方面优于苯妥英,且导致停药的严重 ADR 较少。还需要进一步开展高质量的比较左乙拉西坦与安慰剂的研究,为制定 AED 指南提供证据。