MacDowall Anna, Skeppholm Martin, Lindhagen Lars, Robinson Yohan, Olerud Claes
1Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
2Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Medical Management Center, Health Economics and Health Evaluation Research Group, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Oct;29(4):371-379. doi: 10.3171/2018.2.SPINE171378. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
Several efforts have been made to investigate the long-term efficacy of artificial disc replacement surgery compared with that of fusion after decompression for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy. However, research on the impact of mental distress on surgical treatment outcome has been sparse. The aim of the authors was to investigate the potential predictive value of preoperative risk factors in determining long-term outcome.
A total of 153 patients (mean age 47 years) with single- or double-level cervical degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy were randomly assigned to undergo either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (n = 70) or artificial disc replacement (n = 83). The primary outcome was the Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, a patient-reported function score that ranges from 0% to 100%; higher scores indicate greater disability. Preoperative variables such as sex, age, smoking status, employment status, having a strenuous job, neck pain duration, arm pain duration, amount of regular exercise, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score, NDI score, whether surgery was performed on 1 or 2 levels, and allocated treatment were analyzed in multiple linear regression models with the 5-year NDI score as the outcome.
A total of 47 (31%) patients had either a HADS anxiety or HADS depression score of 10 points or higher. High values on the preoperative HADS were a negative predictor of outcome (p = 0.009). Treatment allocation had no effect on 5-year NDI scores (p = 0.32).
Preoperative mental distress measured with the HADS affects long-term outcome in surgically treated patients with cervical radiculopathy.
为研究人工椎间盘置换手术与减压融合术后治疗颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病和神经根病的长期疗效,已开展了多项研究。然而,关于精神困扰对手术治疗结果影响的研究却很少。作者的目的是研究术前风险因素在确定长期结果方面的潜在预测价值。
总共153例(平均年龄47岁)患有单节段或双节段颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病和神经根病的患者被随机分配接受前路颈椎间盘切除融合术(n = 70)或人工椎间盘置换术(n = 83)。主要结局指标是颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)评分,这是一项由患者报告的功能评分,范围从0%到100%;分数越高表明残疾程度越高。术前变量,如性别、年龄、吸烟状况、就业状况、从事高强度工作、颈部疼痛持续时间、手臂疼痛持续时间、定期运动量、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分、NDI评分、手术是在1个还是2个节段进行以及分配的治疗方式,在以五年NDI评分为结局的多元线性回归模型中进行分析。
共有47例(31%)患者的HADS焦虑或HADS抑郁评分达到10分或更高。术前HADS高分是结局的负性预测因素(p = 0.009)。治疗分配对五年NDI评分没有影响(p = 0.32)。
用HADS测量的术前精神困扰会影响接受手术治疗的颈椎神经根病患者的长期结局。