Suppr超能文献

经皮球囊扩张椎体后凸成形术与经皮椎体成形术治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的比较。

Comparison of percutaneous balloon dilation kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty in treatment for thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Shanxian Central Hospital, Shanxian, China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018 Jul;22(1 Suppl):96-102. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201807_15370.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are common diseases in elderly patients and can cause serious thoracolumbar compression fractures. For patients with such fractures, conservative treatment, nail-stick fixation, percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) can be selected as treatment methods. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of PKP and PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and sixty-one patients with single-stage osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in thoracolumbar were enrolled and divided into two groups, percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (PKP group) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP group). The subjects were selected from patients who were once treated in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2015. There were 91 cases in PKP group and 70 cases in PVP group. The hospitalization time, operation-related index (including blood loss, bone cement injection, surgical time and number of intraoperative fluoroscopy), bedrest time, visual analog pain score (VAS), Cobb's angle, vertebral anterior height, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) dysfunction index and quality of life score were compared to evaluate the clinical effects of the two treatment methods.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in hospitalization time, operation-related index (including blood loss, bone cement injection, operation time, number of intraoperative fluoroscopies) and bed rest time between the two groups. Compared with the patients in PVP group, patients of PKP group had less hospital stay (p<0.001), less time in bed (p<0.05) and less intraoperative blood loss (p<0.05). In addition, the number of times we used intraoperative fluoroscopy was significantly different between the two groups (p<0.001). However, the operation time of PKP group was longer than that of PVP group, and the amount of intraoperative cement injection was more than that of PVP group (p<0.05). After treatment, VAS scores in both groups were dramatically decreased, of which the scores in PKP group were markedly lower than that in PVP group and the difference was statistically significant (p<0.05). The changes of Cobb's angle, the height of anterior vertebral body and ODI scores in PKP group were noticeably better than PVP group (p<0.05). There were 5 cases occurring intraoperative cement leakage in PKP group and 12 cases in PVP group, indicating that the former is relatively better (p<0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the two groups in the occurrence of secondary vertebral fractures at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after treatment (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical effects of both PKP and PVP in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures are good, of which the reductive and analgesic effect of PKP is superior to that of PVP and the former has less leakage of cement, higher safety and fewer complications.

摘要

目的

骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCFs)是老年患者的常见疾病,可导致严重的胸腰椎压缩骨折。对于此类骨折患者,可以选择保守治疗、钉棒固定、经皮椎体成形术(PVP)和经皮椎体后凸成形术(PKP)作为治疗方法。本研究旨在比较 PKP 和 PVP 治疗骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折的临床疗效。

患者和方法

纳入我院 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月收治的 161 例单节段骨质疏松性胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者,分为经皮球囊后凸成形术(PKP 组)和经皮椎体成形术(PVP 组)。患者均为同期住院患者,其中 PKP 组 91 例,PVP 组 70 例。比较两组患者的住院时间、手术相关指标(包括出血量、骨水泥注入量、手术时间、术中透视次数)、卧床时间、视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)、Cobb 角、椎体前缘高度、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)和生活质量评分,评估两种治疗方法的临床效果。

结果

两组患者的住院时间、手术相关指标(包括出血量、骨水泥注入量、手术时间、术中透视次数)和卧床时间比较,差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。与 PVP 组相比,PKP 组患者的住院时间更短(P<0.001),卧床时间更短(P<0.05),术中出血量更少(P<0.05)。此外,两组患者术中透视次数差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。但 PKP 组的手术时间长于 PVP 组,术中骨水泥注入量多于 PVP 组(均 P<0.05)。治疗后,两组 VAS 评分均显著降低,其中 PKP 组评分明显低于 PVP 组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PKP 组 Cobb 角、椎体前缘高度和 ODI 评分的变化明显优于 PVP 组(P<0.05)。PKP 组术中发生骨水泥渗漏 5 例,PVP 组 12 例,前者明显优于后者(P<0.001)。但两组患者在治疗后 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时,继发性椎体骨折的发生率差异无统计学意义(均 P>0.05)。

结论

PKP 和 PVP 治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的临床效果均良好,其中 PKP 的复位和止痛效果优于 PVP,且前者骨水泥渗漏少,安全性更高,并发症更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验