• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对多种无序治疗和聚类观察的双重稳健估计:评估药物洗脱冠状动脉支架。

Double robust estimation for multiple unordered treatments and clustered observations: Evaluating drug-eluting coronary artery stents.

作者信息

Rose Sherri, Normand Sharon-Lise

机构信息

Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):289-296. doi: 10.1111/biom.12927. Epub 2018 Jul 13.

DOI:10.1111/biom.12927
PMID:30004575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6330249/
Abstract

Postmarket comparative effectiveness and safety analyses of therapeutic treatments typically involve large observational cohorts. We propose double robust machine learning estimation techniques for implantable medical device evaluations where there are more than two unordered treatments and patients are clustered in hospitals. This flexible approach also accommodates high-dimensional covariates drawn from clinical databases. The Massachusetts Data Analysis Center percutaneous coronary intervention cohort is used to assess the composite outcome of 10 drug-eluting stents among adults implanted with at least one drug-eluting stent in Massachusetts. We find remarkable discrimination between stents. A simulation study designed to mimic this coronary intervention cohort is also presented and produced similar results.

摘要

治疗性治疗的上市后比较有效性和安全性分析通常涉及大型观察性队列。我们提出了双稳健机器学习估计技术,用于可植入医疗设备评估,其中存在两种以上无序治疗且患者在医院中聚类。这种灵活的方法还适用于从临床数据库中提取的高维协变量。马萨诸塞州数据分析中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗队列用于评估马萨诸塞州至少植入一个药物洗脱支架的成年人中10种药物洗脱支架的复合结局。我们发现支架之间存在显著的区分度。还介绍了一项旨在模拟该冠状动脉介入治疗队列的模拟研究,并得出了类似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/fa9aed20c86e/nihms983644f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/3226c12cd533/nihms983644f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/14c6ffefaa00/nihms983644f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/fa9aed20c86e/nihms983644f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/3226c12cd533/nihms983644f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/14c6ffefaa00/nihms983644f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17e0/6330249/fa9aed20c86e/nihms983644f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Double robust estimation for multiple unordered treatments and clustered observations: Evaluating drug-eluting coronary artery stents.针对多种无序治疗和聚类观察的双重稳健估计:评估药物洗脱冠状动脉支架。
Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):289-296. doi: 10.1111/biom.12927. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
2
A randomized comparison of platinum chromium-based everolimus-eluting stents versus cobalt chromium-based Zotarolimus-Eluting stents in all-comers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: HOST-ASSURE (harmonizing optimal strategy for treatment of coronary artery stenosis-safety & effectiveness of drug-eluting stents & anti-platelet regimen), a randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial.随机比较全人群经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中使用基于铂铬的依维莫司洗脱支架与基于钴铬的佐他莫司洗脱支架:HOST-ASSURE(优化治疗冠状动脉狭窄策略的协调性研究-药物洗脱支架和抗血小板方案的安全性和有效性),一项随机、对照、非劣效性试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 1;63(25 Pt A):2805-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.013. Epub 2014 May 7.
3
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention vs Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗左主干狭窄患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;2(10):1079-1088. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2895.
4
An Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness of Stents Used in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.支架治疗冠状动脉疾病的成本效益分析。
Balkan Med J. 2019 Aug 22;36(5):276-282. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.galenos.2019.2018.12.28. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
5
Proximal left anterior descending coronary artery revascularization with drug-eluting stents.使用药物洗脱支架对左冠状动脉前降支近端进行血运重建。
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2007 Feb;88(2):159-66. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2007000200005.
6
Comprehensive analysis of predictive factors for rapid angiographic stenotic progression and restenosis risk in coronary artery disease patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents implantation.对接受药物洗脱支架植入的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠心病患者快速血管造影狭窄进展和再狭窄风险的预测因素进行综合分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2019 Feb;33(2):e22666. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22666. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
The DELTA 2 Registry: A Multicenter Registry Evaluating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Obstructive Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.DELTA 2 注册研究:一项多中心注册研究,旨在评估新型药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗伴左主干病变的患者。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 11;10(23):2401-2410. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.050.
8
Impact of lesion length and vessel size on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stents pooled analysis from the SPIRIT (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) and COMPARE (Second-generation everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting stents in real-life practice) Randomized Trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后病变长度和血管大小对临床结局的影响:来自 SPIRIT(依维莫司洗脱冠状动脉支架系统 XIENCE V 的临床评估)和 COMPARE(真实世界中第二代依维莫司洗脱和紫杉醇洗脱支架)随机试验的汇总分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1209-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.07.016.
9
Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.糖尿病患者经生物可降解聚合物西罗莫司洗脱支架与持久性聚合物依维莫司洗脱支架治疗的 5 年结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 19;8(22):e013607. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013607. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
10
A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing nonurgent percutaneous coronary intervention comparing bare metal stents with drug-eluting stents using the National Institute for Clinical Excellence criteria.一项采用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所标准,对接受非紧急经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的连续患者进行的回顾性分析,比较裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架。
Coron Artery Dis. 2011 Jan;22(1):32-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328340b824.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-Sectoral Comparisons of Process Quality Indicators of Health Care Across Residential Regions Using Restricted Mean Survival Time.使用受限平均生存时间对不同居住区域的医疗保健过程质量指标进行跨部门比较。
Med Care. 2024 Nov 1;62(11):748-756. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002057. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
2
CIMTx: An R Package for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments using Observational Data.CIMTx:一个使用观测数据进行多重处理因果推断的R包。
R J. 2022 Sep;14(3):213-230. doi: 10.32614/rj-2022-058. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
3
Targeted learning in observational studies with multi-valued treatments: An evaluation of antipsychotic drug treatment safety.

本文引用的文献

1
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for the Treatment of Stenoses in Small Coronary Arteries: A Network Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗小冠状动脉狭窄:网状荟萃分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.025. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
2
Doubly robust methods for handling confounding by cluster.用于处理聚类混杂的双重稳健方法。
Biostatistics. 2016 Apr;17(2):264-76. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxv041. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
3
Bridging Unmet Medical Device Ecosystem Needs With Strategically Coordinated Registries Networks.
多值治疗观察性研究中的靶向学习:抗精神病药物治疗安全性评估
Stat Med. 2024 Apr 15;43(8):1489-1508. doi: 10.1002/sim.10003. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
4
Matching on poset-based average rank for multiple treatments to compare many unbalanced groups.基于偏序集平均秩的多处理匹配比较多个不平衡组。
Stat Med. 2021 Dec 10;40(28):6443-6458. doi: 10.1002/sim.9192. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
5
Revisiting performance metrics for prediction with rare outcomes.重新探讨稀有结局预测的性能指标。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Oct;30(10):2352-2366. doi: 10.1177/09622802211038754. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
6
Estimation of causal effects of multiple treatments in observational studies with a binary outcome.二元结局观察性研究中多种治疗因果效应的估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Nov;29(11):3218-3234. doi: 10.1177/0962280220921909. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
Intersections of machine learning and epidemiological methods for health services research.机器学习与流行病学方法在卫生服务研究中的交汇。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jan 23;49(6):1763-1770. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa035.
通过战略协调的注册网络满足未满足的医疗设备生态系统需求。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 27;314(16):1691-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.11036.
4
Matching With Doses in an Observational Study of a Media Campaign Against Drug Abuse.在一项反对药物滥用的媒体宣传活动观察性研究中匹配剂量
J Am Stat Assoc. 2001 Dec;96(456):1245-1253. doi: 10.1198/016214501753381896.
5
Comparative effectiveness of ceramic-on-ceramic implants in stemmed hip replacement: a multinational study of six national and regional registries.带柄髋关节置换中陶瓷对陶瓷植入物的比较有效性:一项对六个国家和地区登记处的跨国研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Dec 17;96 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):34-41. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.N.00465.
6
EFFECT OF BREASTFEEDING ON GASTROINTESTINAL INFECTION IN INFANTS: A TARGETED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD APPROACH FOR CLUSTERED LONGITUDINAL DATA.母乳喂养对婴儿胃肠道感染的影响:一种针对聚类纵向数据的靶向最大似然法
Ann Appl Stat. 2014 Jun;8(2):703-725. doi: 10.1214/14-aoas727.
7
Postmarketing surveillance of medical devices--filling in the gaps.医疗器械上市后监测——填补空白
N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 8;366(10):875-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1114865. Epub 2012 Feb 14.
8
The relative performance of targeted maximum likelihood estimators.靶向最大似然估计量的相对性能。
Int J Biostat. 2011;7(1). doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1308. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
9
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of the parameter of a marginal structural model.边际结构模型参数的靶向最大似然估计。
Int J Biostat. 2010;6(2):Article 19. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1238. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
10
The (paper) work of medicine: understanding international medical costs.医学文献:了解国际医疗费用
J Econ Perspect. 2011 Spring;25(2):3-25. doi: 10.1257/jep.25.2.3.