Carney Patricia A, Eiff M Patrice, Waller Elaine, Jones Samuel M, Green Larry A
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Virginia Commonwealth University-Fairfax Residency Program, Fairfax, VA.
Fam Med. 2018 Jul;50(7):503-517. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2018.829131.
The Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) project (2007 to 2014) involved a comparative case study of experiments conducted by 14 selected family medicine programs designed to evaluate new models of residency education that aligned with the patient-centered medical home (PCMH). Changes in length, structure, content, and location of training were studied.
We conducted both a critical review of P4 published Evaluation Center and site-specific papers and a qualitative narrative analysis of process reports compiled throughout the project. We mapped key findings from P4 to results obtained from a survey of program directors on their top 10 "need to know" areas in family medicine education.
Collectively, 830 unique residents took part in P4, which explored 80 hypotheses regarding 44 innovations. To date, 39 papers have resulted from P4 work, with the P4 Evaluation Center producing 17 manuscripts and faculty at individual sites producing 22 manuscripts. P4 investigators delivered 21 presentations and faculty from P4 participating programs delivered 133 presentations at national meetings. For brevity, we present findings derived from the analyses of project findings according to the following categories: (1) how residency training aligned with PCMH; (2) educational redesign and assessment; (3) methods of financing new residency experiences; (4) length of training; (5) scope of practice; and (6) setting standards for conducting multisite educational research.
The P4 project was a successful model for multisite graduate medical education research. Insights gained from the P4 project could help family medicine educators with future residency program redesign.
“为执业培养个人医师”(P4)项目(2007年至2014年)对14个选定的家庭医学项目所开展的实验进行了比较案例研究,旨在评估与以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)相一致的住院医师教育新模式。研究了培训的时长、结构、内容和地点的变化。
我们对P4发布的评估中心报告和特定地点的论文进行了批判性综述,并对整个项目过程中编写的过程报告进行了定性叙述分析。我们将P4的主要发现与对项目主任关于家庭医学教育前十大“需要了解”领域的调查结果进行了比对。
共有830名不同的住院医师参与了P4项目,该项目探索了80个关于44项创新的假设。迄今为止,P4项目的工作已产生39篇论文,其中P4评估中心发表了17篇手稿,各地点的教员发表了22篇手稿。P4项目的研究人员在全国会议上进行了21次报告,P4参与项目的教员进行了133次报告。为简洁起见,我们根据以下类别展示从项目结果分析中得出的结果:(1)住院医师培训与PCMH的契合度;(2)教育重新设计与评估;(3)为新的住院医师培训经历筹集资金的方法;(4)培训时长;(5)执业范围;(6)开展多地点教育研究的标准设定。
P4项目是多地点毕业后医学教育研究的成功典范。从P4项目中获得的见解可为家庭医学教育工作者未来重新设计住院医师培训项目提供帮助。