Suppr超能文献

健康、污名化和控制的复杂叙事:非住院难民中的抗微生物药物耐药性筛查。

Complex narratives of health, stigma and control: Antimicrobial resistance screening among non-hospitalized refugees.

机构信息

Department of Health, Ethics and Society, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Postbus 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Research Centre for Policy Analysis and Studies of Technologies (PAST-Centre), National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russian Federation.

Department of Medical Microbiology, School of Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2018 Sep;212:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is often presented as a major public health problem globally. Screening for AMR usually takes place in clinical settings. Recent developments in microbiology stimulated a series of studies focusing on AMR in communities, and particularly in travelers (any mobile individual), which was argued to be important for identifying potential public health risks. Against this background, microbiologists have become interested in non-hospitalized refugees as one of the traveler groups. However, this attention to refugees has provoked some professional debates on potential stigmatization of refugees as dangerous "others". To contribute to these debates, and to explore the idea of AMR screening of non-hospitalized refugees from different perspectives, we conducted a qualitative study among four groups of stakeholders who were chosen because of their associations with potential microbiological screening: microbiologists, public health physicians, public health nurses, and refugees. The study took place in a Dutch city from June to August 2016 and had 17 participants: five microbiologists, two public health nurses, four public health physicians, and six refugees. While microbiologists and public health physicians demonstrated a de-contextualized biomedical narrative in arguing that AMR screening among non-hospitalized refugees could be important for scientific research as well as for AMR prevention in communities, public health nurses displayed a more contextualized narrative bringing the benefits for individuals at the center and indicating that screening exclusively among refugees may provoke fear and stigmatization. Refugees were rather positive about AMR screening but stressed that it should particularly contribute to their individual health. We conclude that to design AMR prevention strategies, it is important to consider the complex meanings of AMR screening, and to design these strategies as a process of co-production by diverse stakeholders, including the target populations.

摘要

抗生素耐药性(AMR)通常被认为是全球主要的公共卫生问题。AMR 的筛查通常在临床环境中进行。最近微生物学的发展激发了一系列关注社区中 AMR 的研究,特别是在旅行者(任何流动的个人)中,这被认为对于识别潜在的公共卫生风险很重要。在此背景下,微生物学家对非住院难民产生了兴趣,将其视为旅行者群体之一。然而,这种对难民的关注引发了一些关于将难民污名化为危险“他者”的专业争论。为了参与这些辩论,并从不同角度探讨对非住院难民进行 AMR 筛查的想法,我们在与潜在微生物筛查相关的四个利益相关者群体中进行了一项定性研究:微生物学家、公共卫生医生、公共卫生护士和难民。该研究于 2016 年 6 月至 8 月在荷兰的一个城市进行,共有 17 名参与者:5 名微生物学家、2 名公共卫生护士、4 名公共卫生医生和 6 名难民。虽然微生物学家和公共卫生医生在争论中表现出一种去语境化的生物医学叙事,认为对非住院难民进行 AMR 筛查对于科学研究以及社区中 AMR 的预防都很重要,但公共卫生护士则表现出一种更具语境化的叙事,将个人的利益置于中心,并指出仅在难民中进行筛查可能会引起恐惧和污名化。难民对 AMR 筛查持积极态度,但强调它应特别有助于他们的个人健康。我们得出的结论是,为了设计 AMR 预防策略,重要的是要考虑 AMR 筛查的复杂含义,并通过包括目标人群在内的不同利益相关者共同设计这些策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验