• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兴奋剂多药物使用者的社会认知功能。

Socio-cognitive functioning in stimulant polysubstance users.

机构信息

Experimental and Clinical Pharmacopsychology, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Zurich, Lenggstrasse 31, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Center for Forensic Hair Analysis, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Kurvenstrasse 17, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.001
PMID:30005311
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using more than one psychotropic substance is accompanied by increased risks for psychiatric and physical disorders. Accordingly, deficits in basal cognitive functions have been consistently associated with polysubstance use (PSU), whereas little is known about potential impairments in more complex socio-cognitive skills, which are relevant for daily-life functioning. Therefore, we investigated the effects of toxicological validated stimulant PSU on social cognition under consideration of potential cumulative effects.

METHODS

We compared socio-cognitive performances of 47 individuals with stimulant PSU with 59 matched stimulant-naïve controls using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). Additionally, social network size was assessed by the Social Network Questionnaire (SNQ). Hair and urine testing was employed to categorize three PSU subgroups (3, 4, and ≥5 substances used) and to ensure drug abstinence in controls.

RESULTS

Individuals with stimulant PSU showed lower emotional empathy (MET) and a smaller social network (SNQ) compared to controls (both with linear trends for increasing number of used substances: p < .05). In contrast, cognitive empathy (MET and MASC) was largely unaffected by PSU. Additional linear regression analyses within PSU individuals revealed number of used substances as the best predictor for inferior performance in emotional empathy (p < .01), while severity of the use of single substances or substance-classes did not show a significant impact.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate cumulative adverse effects of stimulant PSU on an important facet of socio-cognitive functioning. Therefore, emotional empathy deficits should be targeted in future interventions and rehabilitations for individuals with PSU.

摘要

背景

使用一种以上的精神活性物质会增加精神和身体障碍的风险。因此,基底认知功能缺陷与多药物使用(PSU)密切相关,而对于与日常生活功能相关的更复杂的社会认知技能的潜在损伤知之甚少。因此,我们研究了在考虑潜在累积效应的情况下,经毒物学验证的兴奋剂 PSU 对社会认知的影响。

方法

我们使用多维共情测试(MET)和电影评估社会认知测试(MASC)比较了 47 名兴奋剂 PSU 患者和 59 名匹配的兴奋剂未使用者的社会认知表现。此外,还通过社会网络问卷(SNQ)评估了社会网络规模。毛发和尿液检测用于将 PSU 分为三组(使用 3、4 和≥5 种物质),并确保对照组药物戒断。

结果

与对照组相比,兴奋剂 PSU 患者的情绪共情(MET)和社会网络(SNQ)较低(随着使用物质数量的增加,均呈线性趋势:p<0.05)。相比之下,认知共情(MET 和 MASC)受 PSU 的影响不大。在 PSU 患者中进行的额外线性回归分析表明,使用物质的数量是情绪共情表现较差的最佳预测因素(p<0.01),而单个物质或物质类别的使用严重程度没有显著影响。

结论

这些发现表明,兴奋剂 PSU 对社会认知功能的一个重要方面有累积的不良影响。因此,在未来对 PSU 患者的干预和康复中,应针对情绪共情缺陷进行治疗。

相似文献

1
Socio-cognitive functioning in stimulant polysubstance users.兴奋剂多药物使用者的社会认知功能。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Sep 1;190:94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
2
Cognitive and socio-cognitive functioning of chronic non-medical prescription opioid users.慢性非医疗处方类阿片使用者的认知和社会认知功能。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Dec;235(12):3451-3464. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5060-z. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
3
Impaired emotional empathy and related social network deficits in cocaine users.可卡因使用者的情感共鸣受损及相关社交网络缺陷
Addict Biol. 2014 May;19(3):452-66. doi: 10.1111/adb.12070. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
4
Pharmacological Cognitive Enhancement in Healthy Individuals: A Compensation for Cognitive Deficits or a Question of Personality?健康个体中的药物认知增强:是对认知缺陷的补偿还是个性问题?
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 24;10(6):e0129805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129805. eCollection 2015.
5
Differential effects of MDMA and methylphenidate on social cognition.MDMA 和哌甲酯对社会认知的影响差异。
J Psychopharmacol. 2014 Sep;28(9):847-56. doi: 10.1177/0269881114542454. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
6
Effects of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade on empathy in patients with major depressive disorder.盐皮质激素受体阻断对重度抑郁症患者共情能力的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Oct;16(5):902-10. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0441-4.
7
Brain perfusion in polysubstance users: relationship to substance and tobacco use, cognition, and self-regulation.多物质使用者的脑灌注:与物质及烟草使用、认知和自我调节的关系。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 May 1;150:120-8. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.02.022. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
8
Alcohol use disorder with and without stimulant use: brain morphometry and its associations with cigarette smoking, cognition, and inhibitory control.伴有和不伴有兴奋剂使用的酒精使用障碍:脑形态测量及其与吸烟、认知和抑制控制的关联
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0122505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122505. eCollection 2015.
9
Chemical cousins with contrasting behavioural profiles: MDMA users and methamphetamine users differ in social-cognitive functions and aggression.具有不同行为特征的化学“表亲”:MDMA 用户和甲基苯丙胺用户在社会认知功能和攻击性方面存在差异。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024 Jun;83:43-54. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
10
Neurocognition and inhibitory control in polysubstance use disorders: Comparison with alcohol use disorders and changes with abstinence.多物质使用障碍中的神经认知与抑制控制:与酒精使用障碍的比较及戒断后的变化
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb;39(1):22-34. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1196165. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Impairment in social cognition in people with substance use disorders.物质使用障碍患者的社会认知受损。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 27;16:1574483. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1574483. eCollection 2025.
2
Animal models of cocaine use: importance of social context and co-use.可卡因使用的动物模型:社会环境和共同使用的重要性。
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2025 Mar;46(3):220-230. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
Substance Use Treatment Utilization Among Individuals With Substance Use Disorders in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings on the Role of Polysubstance Use, Criminal Justice Involvement, and Mental Illness From the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.
COVID-19大流行期间美国物质使用障碍患者的物质使用治疗利用情况:来自全国药物使用和健康调查的关于多物质使用、刑事司法参与和精神疾病作用的调查结果
Subst Use. 2024 Jun 12;18:29768357241259947. doi: 10.1177/29768357241259947. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
A Comparative Study of Women With Substance Use Disorder With and Without Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: Complex Interaction Between Childhood Trauma, Empathy, Personality Traits, and Substance Use Severity.患有和未患有创伤后应激障碍的物质使用障碍女性的比较研究:童年创伤、同理心、人格特质与物质使用严重程度之间的复杂相互作用。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2023 Sep 1;24(5):226-233. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2023.231195. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Decoding Emotion in Drug Abusers: Evidence for Face and Body Emotion Recognition and for Disgust Emotion.解读药物滥用者的情绪:面部和身体情绪识别及厌恶情绪的证据
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 Sep 17;12(9):1427-1440. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12090099.
6
Editorial: Polysubstance Abuse and Cognitive Dysfunction.社论:多物质滥用与认知功能障碍
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jul 26;16:916921. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.916921. eCollection 2022.
7
Meta-analysis of associations between empathy and alcohol use and problems in clinical and non-clinical samples.元分析临床和非临床样本中同理心与酒精使用和问题之间的关联。
Addiction. 2022 Nov;117(11):2793-2804. doi: 10.1111/add.15941. Epub 2022 May 29.
8
Polysubstance Use in Early Adulthood: Patterns and Developmental Precursors in an Urban Cohort.成年早期的多物质使用:城市队列中的模式与发育先兆
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Jan 27;15:797473. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.797473. eCollection 2021.
9
Exploring Influences on Theory of Mind Impairment in Opioid Dependent Patients.探索阿片类药物依赖患者心理理论损害的影响因素。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 23;12:721690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.721690. eCollection 2021.
10
Social Information Processing in Substance Use Disorders: Insights From an Emotional Go-Nogo Task.物质使用障碍中的社会信息处理:来自情绪停止信号任务的见解
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 28;12:672488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.672488. eCollection 2021.