Nolan Robert P, Feldman Ross, Dawes Martin, Kaczorowski Janusz, Lynn Hazel, Barr Susan I, MacPhail Carolyn, Thomas Scott, Goodman Jack, Eysenbach Gunther, Liu Sam, Tanaka Rika, Surikova Jelena
Peter Munk Cardiac Centre (R.P.N., R.T., J.S.)
University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada (R.P.N., S.T., J.G., G.E.).
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Jul;11(7):e004420. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004420.
The efficacy of internet-based interventions to improve hypertension management is not established. We evaluated the therapeutic benefit of e-counseling by adapting best evidence guidelines for behavioral counseling.
This multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial included assessments at baseline, 4 months, and 12 months. Participants were 35 to 74 years of age and diagnosed with hypertension: systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) 130 to 180/85 to 110 mm Hg. BP was assessed by automated office measurement. E-Counseling used multimedia and interactive tools to increase motivation and skill for self-care (exercise, diet, medication adherence, and smoking cessation). Control used self-care education. Frequency of contact by our e-platform was equal for both trial arms. Primary end points were change at 4 and 12 months in systolic BP, diastolic BP, pulse pressure, total lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and Framingham 10-year cardiovascular risk index. Intention-to-treat analysis used generalized linear models adjusted for baseline measures, sex, and medications. Among 264 participants, mean age was 57.6 years (SE, 0.6), 58% were women, with 83% on antihypertensive medications. At 12 months, e-counseling versus control evoked greater reduction in systolic BP (-10.1 mm Hg [95% confidence interval (CI), -12.5, -7.6] versus -6.0 mm Hg [95% CI, -8.5, -3.5]; =0.02); pulse pressure (-5.2 mm Hg [95% CI, -6.9, -3.5] versus -2.7 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.5, -0.9]; =0.04), and Framingham risk index (-1.9% [95% CI, -3.3, -0.5] versus -0.02% [95% CI, -1.2, 1.7]; =0.02), respectively. Among males in e-counseling versus control, 12-month end points included lower diastolic BP (=0.01), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (=0.04), total lipoprotein cholesterol (=0.03), and a trend for total lipoprotein cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (=0.07).
To our knowledge, this is the first double-blind randomized trial of e-counseling for hypertension. Added benefit for medical therapy was achieved by combining available technology with a clinically organized protocol of motivational and cognitive-behavioral counseling.
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01541540.
基于互联网的干预措施改善高血压管理的疗效尚未确立。我们通过采用行为咨询的最佳证据指南来评估电子咨询的治疗益处。
这项多中心双盲随机对照试验包括在基线、4个月和12个月时进行评估。参与者年龄在35至74岁之间,被诊断为高血压:收缩压/舒张压为130至180/85至110毫米汞柱。血压通过自动诊室测量进行评估。电子咨询使用多媒体和交互式工具来增强自我护理(运动、饮食、药物依从性和戒烟)的动机和技能。对照组采用自我护理教育。两个试验组通过我们的电子平台进行联系的频率相同。主要终点是4个月和12个月时收缩压、舒张压、脉压、总脂蛋白胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、总脂蛋白胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇以及弗雷明汉10年心血管风险指数的变化。意向性分析使用针对基线测量、性别和药物进行调整的广义线性模型。在264名参与者中,平均年龄为57.6岁(标准误,0.6),58%为女性,83%正在服用抗高血压药物。在12个月时,与对照组相比,电子咨询使收缩压有更大幅度的降低(-10.1毫米汞柱[95%置信区间(CI),-12.5,-7.6] 对比 -6.0毫米汞柱[95%CI,-8.5,-3.5];P = 0.02);脉压(-5.2毫米汞柱[95%CI,-6.9,-3.5] 对比 -2.7毫米汞柱[95%CI,-4.5,-0.9];P = 0.04),以及弗雷明汉风险指数(-1.9%[95%CI,-3.3,-0.5] 对比 -0.02%[95%CI,-1.2,1.7];P = 0.02)。在接受电子咨询与对照组的男性中,12个月的终点指标包括较低的舒张压(P = 0.01)、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(P = 0.04)、总脂蛋白胆固醇(P = 0.03),以及总脂蛋白胆固醇/高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值有下降趋势(P = 0.07)。
据我们所知,这是第一项针对高血压进行电子咨询的双盲随机试验。通过将现有技术与动机性和认知行为咨询的临床组织方案相结合,实现了对药物治疗的额外益处。