• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ACGH 检测原发性肝内胆管癌及其匹配的淋巴结转移的独特基因组改变,并确定预后不良的亚类。

ACGH detects distinct genomic alterations of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and matched lymph node metastases and identifies a poor prognosis subclass.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Heinrich-Heine University and University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.

Institute of Pharmacogenetics, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 13;8(1):10637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28941-6.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-28941-6
PMID:30006612
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6045619/
Abstract

Lymph node metastases (LNM) are an important prognostic factor for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, but underlying genetic alterations are poorly understood. Whole genome array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was performed in 37 tumors and 14 matched LNM. Genomic analyses of tumors confirmed known and identified new (gains in 19q) copy number alterations (CNA). Tumors with LNM (N1) had more alterations and exclusive gains (3p, 4q, 5p, 13q) and losses (17p and 20p). LNM shared most alterations with their matched tumors (86%), but 79% acquired new isolated gains [12q14 (36%); 1p13, 2p23, 7p22, 7q11, 11q12, 13q13 and 14q12 (>20%)]. Unsupervised clustering revealed a poor prognosis subclass with increased alterations significantly associated to tumor differentiation and survival. TP53 and KRAS mutations occurred in 19% of tumors and 6% of metastases. Pathway analyses revealed association to cancer-associated pathways. Advanced tumor stage, microvascular/perineural invasion, and microscopic positive resection margin (R1) were significantly correlated to metastases, while N1-status, R1-resection, and poor tumor differentiation were significantly correlated to survival. ACGH identified clear differences between N0 (no LNM) and N1 tumors, while N1 tumors and matched LNM displayed high clonality with exclusive gains in the metastases. A novel subclass with increased CNAs and poor tumor differentiation was significantly correlated to survival.

摘要

淋巴结转移 (LNM) 是影响肝内胆管细胞癌患者预后的重要因素,但目前对于导致 LNM 的潜在遗传改变知之甚少。本研究对 37 例肿瘤组织和 14 例配对的 LNM 进行了全基因组 array 比较基因组杂交 (aCGH)。肿瘤的基因组分析证实了已知的和新的(19q 增益)拷贝数改变 (CNA)。有 LNM (N1) 的肿瘤有更多的改变和独特的增益(3p、4q、5p、13q)和缺失(17p 和 20p)。LNM 与其匹配的肿瘤有最相似的改变(86%),但 79%获得了新的孤立增益[12q14(36%);1p13、2p23、7p22、7q11、11q12、13q13 和 14q12(>20%)]。无监督聚类显示,一个不良预后亚组的改变明显增加,与肿瘤分化和生存显著相关。TP53 和 KRAS 突变分别发生在 19%的肿瘤和 6%的转移灶中。通路分析显示与癌症相关通路有关。肿瘤分期较高、微血管/神经周围侵犯和镜下阳性切缘(R1)与转移显著相关,而 N1 状态、R1 切除和肿瘤分化不良与生存显著相关。ACGH 明确区分了无 LNM(N0)和有 LNM(N1)的肿瘤,而 N1 肿瘤和匹配的 LNM 显示出高度的克隆性,转移灶有独特的增益。一个新的亚组具有增加的 CNA 和不良的肿瘤分化,与生存显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/01416b862e19/41598_2018_28941_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/51f57ec19856/41598_2018_28941_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/bae5228f069e/41598_2018_28941_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/01ebc8a8e402/41598_2018_28941_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/e185b6f5dfb6/41598_2018_28941_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/cb652f34414a/41598_2018_28941_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/1cbb8cc89154/41598_2018_28941_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/01416b862e19/41598_2018_28941_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/51f57ec19856/41598_2018_28941_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/bae5228f069e/41598_2018_28941_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/01ebc8a8e402/41598_2018_28941_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/e185b6f5dfb6/41598_2018_28941_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/cb652f34414a/41598_2018_28941_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/1cbb8cc89154/41598_2018_28941_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc08/6045619/01416b862e19/41598_2018_28941_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
ACGH detects distinct genomic alterations of primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and matched lymph node metastases and identifies a poor prognosis subclass.ACGH 检测原发性肝内胆管癌及其匹配的淋巴结转移的独特基因组改变,并确定预后不良的亚类。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 13;8(1):10637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28941-6.
2
Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study.肝内胆管癌准确的淋巴结分期需要充分的淋巴结清扫: 一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):8184-8198. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5620. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
Patterns of chromosomal copy-number alterations in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌的染色体拷贝数改变模式
BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 14;15:126. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1111-6.
4
Genomic profiling of multifocal intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals intraindividual concordance of genetic alterations.多灶性肝内胆管癌的基因组分析揭示了个体内遗传改变的一致性。
Carcinogenesis. 2021 Apr 17;42(3):436-441. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgaa124.
5
Identification of Homer1 as a potential prognostic marker for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.鉴定Homer1作为肝内胆管癌的潜在预后标志物。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(7):3299-304. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.7.3299.
6
Clinical implication of tumor site in terms of node metastasis for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.肿瘤部位对肝内胆管癌淋巴结转移的临床意义。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 May;46(5):832-838. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.11.511. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
The prognosis and survival outcome of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: association of lymph node metastasis and lymph node dissection with survival.肝内胆管细胞癌手术后的预后和生存结果:淋巴结转移和淋巴结清扫与生存的关系。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Nov;16(11):3048-56. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0631-1. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
8
Genomic profiling of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: refining prognosis and identifying therapeutic targets.肝内胆管癌的基因组分析:优化预后并确定治疗靶点。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;21(12):3827-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3828-x. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Expression and prognostic value of PRL-3 in human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.PRL-3 在人肝内胆管细胞癌中的表达及预后价值。
Pathol Oncol Res. 2010 Jun;16(2):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s12253-009-9200-y. Epub 2009 Sep 9.
10
Prognostic Impact of Preoperative Lymph Node Enlargement in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multi-Institutional Study by the Kyushu Study Group of Liver Surgery.术前淋巴结肿大对肝内胆管癌的预后影响:九州肝脏外科学术研究组的多机构研究
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;22(7):2269-78. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4239-8. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying a unique chromosomal pattern to predict the gemcitabine response in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.识别一种独特的染色体模式以预测胆管癌患者对吉西他滨的反应。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 8;15(1):11984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96442-4.
2
Deletion of 17p in cancers: Guilt by (p53) association.癌症中17号染色体短臂缺失:因(p53)关联而获罪。
Oncogene. 2025 Mar;44(10):637-651. doi: 10.1038/s41388-025-03300-8. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
3
Formalin Fixation, Delay to Fixation, and Time in Fixative Adversely Impact Copy Number Variation Analysis by aCGH.

本文引用的文献

1
eTumorType, An Algorithm of Discriminating Cancer Types for Circulating Tumor Cells or Cell-free DNAs in Blood.eTumorType:一种用于鉴别血液中循环肿瘤细胞或游离DNA癌症类型的算法
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2017 Apr;15(2):130-140. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
2
KEGG: new perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs.京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG):关于基因组、通路、疾病和药物的新视角。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D353-D361. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1092. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
3
Identification of transcription factors (TFs) and targets involved in the cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) by integrated analysis.
福尔马林固定、固定延迟和固定时间通过 aCGH 对拷贝数变异分析产生不利影响。
Biopreserv Biobank. 2023 Aug;21(4):407-416. doi: 10.1089/bio.2022.0036. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
通过综合分析鉴定胆管癌(CCA)中涉及的转录因子(TFs)及其靶标。
Cancer Gene Ther. 2016 Dec;23(12):439-445. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2016.64. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
4
Enhanced circulating transforming growth factor beta 1 is causally associated with an increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a mendelian randomization meta-analysis.循环中转化生长因子β1升高与肝细胞癌风险增加存在因果关联:一项孟德尔随机化荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 20;7(51):84695-84704. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13218.
5
TLR2 promotes human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cell migration and invasion by modulating NF-κB pathway-mediated inflammatory responses.Toll样受体2(TLR2)通过调节核因子κB(NF-κB)途径介导的炎症反应促进人肝内胆管癌细胞的迁移和侵袭。
FEBS J. 2016 Oct;283(20):3839-3850. doi: 10.1111/febs.13894. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
6
Molecular characterization of clear cell renal cell carcinoma identifies CSNK2A1, SPP1 and DEFB1 as promising novel prognostic markers.透明细胞肾细胞癌的分子特征鉴定出CSNK2A1、SPP1和DEFB1为有前景的新型预后标志物。
APMIS. 2016 May;124(5):372-83. doi: 10.1111/apm.12519. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
7
Overexpression of HMGA2 promotes tongue cancer metastasis through EMT pathway.HMGA2的过表达通过EMT途径促进舌癌转移。
J Transl Med. 2016 Jan 27;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0777-0.
8
Genetic and epigenetic heterogeneity of epithelial ovarian cancer and the clinical implications for molecular targeted therapy.上皮性卵巢癌的遗传和表观遗传异质性及其对分子靶向治疗的临床意义。
J Cell Mol Med. 2016 Apr;20(4):581-93. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12771. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
9
Clinical Diagnosis and Staging of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.肝内胆管癌的临床诊断与分期。
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2015 Dec;24(4):481-9. doi: 10.15403/jgld.2014.1121.244.chl.
10
Silencing of HMGA2 suppresses cellular proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in bladder cancer.沉默HMGA2可抑制膀胱癌细胞的增殖、迁移、侵袭及上皮-间质转化。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Jun;37(6):7515-23. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4625-2. Epub 2015 Dec 18.