Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Biomaterials. 2018 Oct;179:209-245. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.06.021. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
Pretargeted nuclear imaging and radiotherapy have recently attracted increasing attention for diagnosis and treatment of cancer with nanomedicines. This is because it conceptually offers better imaging contrast and therapeutic efficiency while reducing the dose to radiosensitive tissues compared to conventional strategies. In conventional imaging and radiotherapy, a directly radiolabeled nano-sized vector is administered and allowed to accumulate in the tumor, typically on a timescale of several days. In contrast, pretargeting is based on a two-step approach. First, a tumor-accumulating vector carrying a tag is administered followed by injection of a fast clearing radiolabeled agent that rapidly recognizes the tag of the tumor-bound vector in vivo. Therefore, pretargeting circumvents the use of long-lived radionuclides that is a necessity for sufficient tumor accumulation and target-to-background ratios using conventional approaches. In this review, we give an overview of recent advances in pretargeted imaging strategies. We will critically reflect on the advantages and disadvantages of current state-of-the-art conventional imaging approaches and compare them to pretargeted strategies. We will discuss the pretargeted imaging concept and the involved chemistry. Finally, we will discuss the steps forward in respect to clinical translation, and how pretargeted strategies could be applied to improve state-of-the-art radiotherapeutic approaches.
靶向核医学成像和放射治疗最近受到越来越多的关注,可用于癌症的诊断和治疗,尤其是结合了纳米医学的应用。与传统策略相比,这是因为它在概念上提供了更好的成像对比度和治疗效率,同时降低了对放射敏感组织的剂量。在传统的成像和放射治疗中,直接放射性标记的纳米级载体被给予并允许在肿瘤中积累,通常需要数天的时间。相比之下,靶向是基于两步法。首先,给予携带标记物的肿瘤蓄积载体,然后注射快速清除的放射性标记物,该标记物在体内迅速识别肿瘤结合载体的标记物。因此,靶向避免了使用传统方法中对于足够的肿瘤积累和靶标与背景比所必需的长寿命放射性核素的使用。在这篇综述中,我们概述了靶向成像策略的最新进展。我们将批判性地反思当前最先进的传统成像方法的优缺点,并将其与靶向策略进行比较。我们将讨论靶向成像的概念和涉及的化学。最后,我们将讨论在临床转化方面的进展,以及靶向策略如何应用于改善最先进的放射治疗方法。