Suppr超能文献

抢救超声引导在经桡动脉心脏导管插入术中的应用价值

Usefulness of rescue ultrasound guidance for transradial cardiac catheterization.

作者信息

Kashiwagi Manabu, Tanimoto Takashi, Kitabata Hironori, Arita Yu, Yamamoto Yasunori, Mori Kazuya, Terada Kosei, Nishiguchi Tsuyoshi, Taruya Akira, Kubo Takashi, Tanaka Atsushi, Akasaka Takashi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Shingu Municipal Medical Center, Japan.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Apr;20(4):311-315. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Transradial cardiac catheterization reduces access site complications and is more comfortable for patients than the transfemoral approach. However, failure of the transradial approach is more common than the transfemoral approach. This study aimed to investigate whether ultrasound-guided rescue could facilitate transradial cardiac catheterization.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 592 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the palpation technique (PT) (n = 280) and the ultrasound guidance (UG) available group (n = 312). The application and the timing of introduction of ultrasound guidance in the UG group were at the discretion of the individual operators.

RESULTS

Real-time ultrasound guidance was used in 98 patients (31.4%) in the UG group. No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in the incidence of hematoma (6.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.62). Although the procedural time in the UG group was longer than that in the PT group (303 s vs. 357 s, p < 0.01), the success rate of sheath insertion was significantly higher in the UG group (97% vs. 92%, p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the availability of UG was the only independent predictor of success of sheath insertion (odds ratio 2.79, 95% confidence interval 1.24-6.31, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although UG maneuvers require additional procedural time for setting up systems, UG rescue was effective for successful transradial cardiac catheterization.

摘要

引言与目的

经桡动脉心脏导管插入术可减少穿刺部位并发症,且相较于经股动脉途径,患者感觉更舒适。然而,经桡动脉途径失败的情况比经股动脉途径更为常见。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下的补救措施是否有助于经桡动脉心脏导管插入术。

方法

我们回顾性分析了592例连续接受冠状动脉造影和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者。患者被分为两组:触诊技术组(PT)(n = 280)和可使用超声引导组(UG)(n = 312)。UG组中超声引导的应用及引入时机由各操作者自行决定。

结果

UG组中有98例患者(31.4%)使用了实时超声引导。两组间血肿发生率无统计学显著差异(6.8%对5.8%,p = 0.62)。尽管UG组的操作时间比PT组长(303秒对357秒,p < 0.01),但UG组鞘管插入成功率显著更高(97%对92%,p < 0.01)。多因素分析显示,UG的可用性是鞘管插入成功的唯一独立预测因素(比值比2.79,95%置信区间1.24 - 6.31,p = 0.01)。

结论

尽管UG操作需要额外的操作时间来设置系统,但UG补救措施对经桡动脉心脏导管插入术的成功是有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验