Suppr超能文献

用于慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压的球囊肺动脉血管成形术:一项系统评价。

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review.

作者信息

Tanabe Nobuhiro, Kawakami Takashi, Satoh Toru, Matsubara Hiromi, Nakanishi Norifumi, Ogino Hitoshi, Tamura Yuichi, Tsujino Ichizo, Ogawa Aiko, Sakao Seiichiro, Nishizaki Mari, Ishida Keiichi, Ichimura Yasunori, Yoshida Masahiro, Tatsumi Koichiro

机构信息

Department of Advanced Medicine in Pulmonary Hypertension, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; Department of Respirology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Respir Investig. 2018 Jul;56(4):332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been performed for inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) or residual pulmonary hypertension after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy and safety of BPA, especially compared to medical treatment or PEA.

METHODS

We reviewed all studies investigating pre- and post-treatment pulmonary hemodynamics, mortality, or complications from three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Japan Medical Abstracts Society) prior to February 2017. From 26 studies retrieved, we selected 13 studies (493 patients): the 10 most recent ones including complete data from each institution, one study of residual pulmonary hypertension, and two studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA.

RESULTS

No randomized controlled or prospective controlled studies comparing BPA with medical treatment or PEA were reported. The early mortality of BPA ranged from 0% to 14.3%; lung injury occurred in 7.0% to 31.4% (average sessions, 2.5-6.6). Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 39.4-56 to 20.9-36 mm Hg, and the 6-min walk distance increased from 191-405 to 359-501 m. The 2-year mortality of 80 patients undergoing BPA was significantly lower compared to 68 patients receiving medical treatment (1.3% vs. 13.2%); the risk ratio was 0.14 (95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.76). No significant difference was observed in the 2-year mortality between BPA (n=97) and PEA (n=63) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that BPA improves hemodynamics, has acceptable early mortality, and may improve long-term survival compared with medical treatment in inoperable CTEPH patients.

摘要

背景

球囊肺动脉血管成形术(BPA)已用于无法手术的慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压(CTEPH)或肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)后残留的肺动脉高压。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估BPA的疗效和安全性,特别是与药物治疗或PEA相比。

方法

我们检索了2017年2月之前来自三个电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、日本医学摘要协会)的所有研究,这些研究调查了治疗前后的肺血流动力学、死亡率或并发症。从检索到的26项研究中,我们选择了13项研究(493例患者):10项最新研究包括每个机构的完整数据、1项关于残留肺动脉高压的研究以及2项比较BPA与药物治疗或PEA的研究。

结果

未报告比较BPA与药物治疗或PEA的随机对照或前瞻性对照研究。BPA的早期死亡率为0%至14.3%;肺损伤发生率为7.0%至31.4%(平均治疗次数,2.5 - 6.6次)。平均肺动脉压从39.4 - 56降至20.9 - 36 mmHg,6分钟步行距离从191 - 405增加到359 - 501 m。80例接受BPA治疗的患者的2年死亡率显著低于68例接受药物治疗的患者(1.3%对13.2%);风险比为0.14(95%置信区间:0.03 - 0.76)。BPA组(n = 97)和PEA组(n = 63)患者的2年死亡率无显著差异。

结论

这项系统评价表明,在无法手术的CTEPH患者中,BPA可改善血流动力学,早期死亡率可接受,与药物治疗相比可能改善长期生存。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验