Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Dept. of Endocrinology and Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Bone. 2018 Sep;114:298-303. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
The diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis, a bone mineral density (BMD) T-score ≤ -2.5, signals an increased risk for fracture. However, most fragility fractures arise among the majority of women with 'osteopenia' or 'normal' BMD. We hypothesized that a BMD T-score of -2.5, even if not intended as a treatment threshold, paradoxically may create disincentive to initiating treatment of women with osteopenia or normal BMD at high risk for fracture. From a population-based BMD registry covering the Province of Manitoba, Canada, we identified 3735 untreated women aged ≥ 50 years undergoing BMD screening in 2006-2015 found to qualify for Osteoporosis Canada guidelines-based treatment. The main outcome was prescription of an approved osteoporosis medications in the year after BMD testing ascertained from a population-based pharmacy database. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for treatment initiation based on BMD, major fracture history (non-traumatic vertebral, hip or multiple fractures), age, and calendar year (to examine the impact of treatment guidelines published in 2010). Among these women, 50% (1853) initiated treatment: 71% with osteoporosis, 21% with osteopenia, and 5% with normal BMD with similar values in those with a prior major fracture (71%, 19%, 5%, respectively). Compared to women with osteoporosis, adjusted ORs for treatment of high risk women with osteopenia or normal BMD alone were 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.12) and 0.02 (95% CI 0.01-0.04), respectively, and no higher in women with a prior major fracture (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.84-1.19) or following introduction of treatment guidelines (p = 0.294). In summary, we found evidence that the diagnostic threshold for osteoporosis may serve as a disincentive to initiation of treatment in many women at high risk for incident fracture.
骨质疏松症的诊断阈值为骨矿物质密度 (BMD) T 评分≤-2.5,表明骨折风险增加。然而,大多数脆性骨折发生在大多数患有“骨质疏松症”或“正常”BMD 的女性中。我们假设,即使 BMD T 评分不打算作为治疗阈值,也可能会对治疗骨质疏松症或正常 BMD 但骨折风险高的女性产生抑制作用。我们从覆盖加拿大曼尼托巴省的基于人群的 BMD 登记处中,确定了 3735 名在 2006 年至 2015 年期间接受 BMD 筛查且年龄≥50 岁的未经治疗的女性,这些女性符合加拿大骨质疏松症指南规定的治疗条件。主要结局是从基于人群的药房数据库中确定 BMD 检测后一年内开出的批准骨质疏松症药物的处方。我们根据 BMD、主要骨折史(非创伤性椎体、髋部或多发性骨折)、年龄和日历年来估计治疗起始的调整后比值比(OR,95%置信区间 [CI]),以检查 2010 年发布的治疗指南的影响。在这些女性中,50%(1853 人)开始治疗:71%患有骨质疏松症,21%患有骨质疏松症,5%患有正常 BMD,而有既往主要骨折史的患者则分别为 71%、19%和 5%。与骨质疏松症女性相比,单纯高风险骨质疏松症或正常 BMD 女性的治疗调整后 OR 分别为 0.10(95%CI 0.09-0.12)和 0.02(95%CI 0.01-0.04),且既往有主要骨折史(OR 1.00,95%CI 0.84-1.19)或治疗指南发布后(p=0.294)的女性治疗 OR 并不更高。综上所述,我们有证据表明,骨质疏松症的诊断阈值可能会抑制许多骨折风险高的女性开始治疗。