Oswald Ramona Faith, Routon Jasmine M, McGuire Jenifer K, Holman Elizabeth Grace
University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
University of Minnesota.
Fam Relat. 2018 Feb;67(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/fare.12292. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
To understand which aspects of residential communities are most salient for determining whether sexual minority parents classify their residential community climates as tolerant versus supportive.
Metropolitan hubs for lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) parents are well established, but less is known about nonmetropolitan community climates for LGB parents. Residential community climate toward nonmetropolitan LGB persons may be particularly important to LGB parents because of the potential influences on child and family well-being.
Open- and closed-ended survey data from a sample of 55 LGB parents were collected along with publically available data regarding their residential communities. Self-reported residential community climate (tolerant vs. supportive) and community involvement, as well as objective county and municipal climate were analyzed.
Compared with LGB parents who perceived their communities to be tolerant ( = 38), parents who considered their residential communities to be supportive ( = 17) were more likely to live in counties characterized by legal support and broad social acceptance, were personally more likely to participate in LGB-focused social and political activities, had children with more exposure to other LGB families, and attended church less frequently.
Having basic features of equity such as city ordinances and LGB organizations provides a foundation for tolerance in a community; however, individuals in a community must access personal and social supports and activities beyond work and church to feel truly supported.
LGB parents' perceptions of climate reveal specific community features that need to be strengthened to promote family well-being.
了解居民社区的哪些方面对于确定性少数群体父母将其居住社区氛围归类为宽容型还是支持型最为显著。
女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋(LGB)父母的大都市中心已经确立,但对于非大都市地区LGB父母的社区氛围了解较少。居住社区对非大都市地区LGB人群的氛围可能对LGB父母尤为重要,因为这可能会对儿童和家庭福祉产生影响。
收集了55名LGB父母样本的开放式和封闭式调查数据,以及关于他们居住社区的公开数据。分析了自我报告的居住社区氛围(宽容型与支持型)、社区参与度,以及客观的县和市氛围。
与认为其社区宽容的LGB父母(n = 38)相比,认为其居住社区支持的父母(n = 17)更有可能居住在具有法律支持和广泛社会接受度的县,个人更有可能参与以LGB为重点的社会和政治活动,其子女有更多机会接触其他LGB家庭,且去教堂的频率较低。
拥有诸如城市条例和LGB组织等公平的基本特征为社区的宽容提供了基础;然而,社区中的个人必须获得工作和教堂之外的个人和社会支持及活动,才能感到真正得到支持。
LGB父母对氛围的认知揭示了需要加强哪些特定的社区特征以促进家庭福祉。