Newdick Christopher
Professor of health law at the University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jun;20(1):107-120.
How should courts supervise health service resource allocation? Although practice varies widely, four broad approaches can be represented on a matrix comparing, on two axes, (a) individual-community rights and (b) substantive-procedural remedies. Examples from each compartment of the matrix are discussed and, although the community-procedural approach is recommended as a general rule, a range of other responses within the matrix may also be desirable.
法院应如何监督医疗服务资源分配？尽管实践差异很大，但在一个矩阵上可以呈现出四种主要方法，该矩阵在两个轴上进行比较，即(a)个人-社区权利和(b)实体-程序补救措施。文中讨论了矩阵每个部分的示例，尽管一般建议采用社区-程序方法，但矩阵内的一系列其他应对措施可能也很有必要。
