Ji Mingde, Zhu Xiaofei, Dong Jie, Qian Shining, Meng Fei, Gu Wanjian, Qiu Wen
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210029, P.R. China.
Department of Immunology, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Aug;16(2):1727-1735. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8871. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
Pleural effusion (PE) is a common manifestation associated with certain chest diseases. However, there is no effective diagnostic marker with high sensitivity and specificity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of several biomarkers in the use of detecting malignant pleural disorder. One hundred and fifty patients with a specific diagnosis of exudative PE were enrolled in this study and were divided into the benign PE group (n=93) and the malignant PE group (n=57). Thoracoscopy was conducted to identify the reasons for the PE. Biomarkers in pleural fluid and in sera were determined either by microparticle enzyme immunoassay [carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)], fluorescence immunoassay [procalcitonin (PCT)] or light-scattering turbidimetric immunoassay [C-reaction protein (CRP)]. Then, correlation analysis and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis individually or in combination were performed. The CRP and PCT levels were higher in benign PE than they were in malignant PE (PCT: P=0.017, P=0.032; CRP: P=0.001, P<0.001, respectively), while CEA levels were lower in benign PE than in malignant PE (CEA: P=0.001, P=0.001, respectively). During the ROC curve analysis, an optimal discrimination was identified by combining pleural CRP, pleural CEA and serum (s)PCT with an area under the curve of 0.973 (sensitivity, 98.9%; specificity, 89.5%). In the diagnosis of PE, there was no single biomarker that appeared to be adequately accurate. The combination of pleural CRP, pleural CEA and sPCT may represent an efficient diagnostic procedure for guiding the patient towards follow-up clinical treatment.
胸腔积液(PE)是某些胸部疾病的常见表现。然而,目前尚无具有高敏感性和特异性的有效诊断标志物。本研究旨在评估几种生物标志物在检测恶性胸腔疾病中的诊断性能。本研究纳入了150例明确诊断为渗出性胸腔积液的患者,并将其分为良性胸腔积液组(n = 93)和恶性胸腔积液组(n = 57)。通过胸腔镜检查确定胸腔积液的病因。采用微粒酶免疫测定法[癌胚抗原(CEA)]、荧光免疫测定法[降钙素原(PCT)]或散射比浊免疫测定法[C反应蛋白(CRP)]检测胸腔积液和血清中的生物标志物。然后,分别或联合进行相关性分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析。良性胸腔积液组的CRP和PCT水平高于恶性胸腔积液组(PCT:P = 0.017,P = 0.032;CRP:P = 0.001,P < 0.001),而良性胸腔积液组的CEA水平低于恶性胸腔积液组(CEA:P = 0.001,P = 0.001)。在ROC曲线分析中,联合检测胸腔CRP、胸腔CEA和血清(s)PCT可获得最佳鉴别效果,曲线下面积为0.973(敏感性为98.9%,特异性为89.5%)。在胸腔积液的诊断中,没有单一的生物标志物表现出足够的准确性。联合检测胸腔CRP、胸腔CEA和sPCT可能是指导患者后续临床治疗的一种有效诊断方法。