Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Med Care Res Rev. 2020 Apr;77(2):187-195. doi: 10.1177/1077558718787742. Epub 2018 Jul 15.
Given the rising cost of long-term care (LTC) services, the selection of a private long-term care insurance (LTCi) policy with inflation protection has critical implications for the ability of this coverage to protect against potentially catastrophic LTC expenses. This study examines the effect of consumers' numeric abilities on the decision to add inflation protection to private LTCi policies. Over 40% of current LTCi policies lack inflation protection. Higher scores on a three-question numeracy scale are associated with increases in the probability of choosing inflation protection at the time of policy purchase, with households answering all three questions correctly being 12 percentage points more likely to have this benefit type relative to those with a numeracy score of 0 ( = .002). Market reforms that simplify the task of evaluating LTCi plans and assessing the value of indexed benefits may be needed to ensure that LTCi policy purchasers are selecting adequate protection against future LTC costs.
鉴于长期护理(LTC)服务成本的不断上升,选择具有通胀保护的私人长期护理保险(LTCi)政策对该保险覆盖范围防范潜在灾难性长期护理费用的能力具有重要意义。本研究考察了消费者的数字能力对为私人 LTCi 政策添加通胀保护的决策的影响。目前超过 40%的 LTCi 政策缺乏通胀保护。在数值能力量表上的得分较高与在购买政策时增加选择通胀保护的可能性相关,在回答所有三个问题的家庭中,选择这种福利类型的可能性比数值能力得分为 0 的家庭高 12 个百分点(=0.002)。可能需要市场改革来简化评估 LTCi 计划和评估指数化福利价值的任务,以确保 LTCi 政策购买者选择了足够的保护来防范未来的 LTC 成本。