• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用单一的非劣效性边界或保留分数来涵盖整个药理学类别被认为是不恰当的。

Using a single noninferiority margin or preserved fraction for an entire pharmacological class was found to be inappropriate.

机构信息

PhD candidate, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Professor of Pharmacotherapy, Chairman of the Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.004
PMID:30009941
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact on noninferiority decisions when using a single margin or single preserved fraction (PF) for all noninferiority trials within a pharmacological class.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

A search in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL resulted in seven active-controlled statin trials (nine noninferiority comparisons) for treating hyperlipidemia. The impact of using a single margin was assessed by calculating whether this margin corresponds to different PFs among comparator statins which will demonstrate that the threshold of demonstrating noninferiority (in terms of the PF) varies among comparator statins. The use of a single PF was assessed by reanalyzing noninferiority in the included trials with new margins (based on the single PF) for each comparator statin.

RESULTS

The use of a single margin resulted in PFs that range between 81% and 89% for the different comparators (i.e., different thresholds). The use of a single PF resulted in four of nine (44%) different noninferiority conclusions compared with the original analyses.

CONCLUSION

The threshold of demonstrating noninferiority with a single margin or single PF of the effect per pharmacological class may not be consistent with using a margin/PF for each comparator separately and may impact the conclusions of noninferiority.

摘要

目的

评估在药理学类别内的所有非劣效性试验中使用单个边缘或单个保留分数(PF)对非劣效性决策的影响。

研究设计和设置

在 PubMed、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 中进行搜索,得出了七项他汀类药物活性对照治疗高血脂症的试验(九项非劣效性比较)。通过计算该边缘是否在比较他汀类药物之间的不同 PF 来评估使用单个边缘的影响,这将表明证明非劣效性(就 PF 而言)的阈值在比较他汀类药物之间有所不同。通过为每个比较他汀类药物使用新的边缘(基于单个 PF)重新分析纳入试验中的非劣效性来评估使用单个 PF。

结果

使用单个边缘导致不同比较者(即不同的阈值)的 PF 范围在 81%至 89%之间。与原始分析相比,使用单个 PF 导致九个中的四个(44%)非劣效性结论不同。

结论

在每个药理学类别中使用单个边缘或单个 PF 来证明效果的非劣效性的阈值可能与为每个比较者分别使用边缘/PF 不一致,并且可能会影响非劣效性的结论。

相似文献

1
Using a single noninferiority margin or preserved fraction for an entire pharmacological class was found to be inappropriate.使用单一的非劣效性边界或保留分数来涵盖整个药理学类别被认为是不恰当的。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Dec;104:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Aug 25.
2
Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: An overview.定义非劣效性界值并分析非劣效性:概述。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;83(8):1636-1642. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13280. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
3
Most noninferiority trials were not designed to preserve active comparator treatment effects.大多数非劣效性试验并非旨在保留活性对照治疗效果。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:82-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
Non-inferiority Trial Design in Drug Development: A Primer for Cardiovascular Healthcare Professionals.药物研发中的非劣效性试验设计:心血管医疗保健专业人员入门指南。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Jun;20(3):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00378-w.
5
Assessing the Justification, Funding, Success, and Survival Outcomes of Randomized Noninferiority Trials of Cancer Drugs: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.评估癌症药物随机非劣效性试验的正当性、资金、成功率和生存结果:系统评价和汇总分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199570. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9570.
6
Quality of reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.非劣效性和等效性随机试验的报告质量
JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1147-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1147.
7
Comparative effectiveness clinical trials in psychiatry: superiority, noninferiority, and the role of active comparators.精神病学中的比较有效性临床试验:优越性、非劣效性以及阳性对照的作用。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1344-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06089whi.
8
Methodological quality of oncology noninferiority clinical trials.肿瘤非劣效性临床试验的方法学质量。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2020 May;149:102938. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102938. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
9
Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.比较方案和出版物中报告的非劣效性边界显示出不完全和不一致的报告。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 May;68(5):510-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.015. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
10
Reporting of noninferiority trials was incomplete in trial registries.试验注册中心报告的非劣效性试验不完整。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Sep;64(9):1034-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.008. Epub 2011 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of UK publicly funded non-inferiority trials: is the design more inferior than it should be?对英国公共资助的非劣效性试验的综述:该设计是否比应有的更差?
Trials. 2024 Dec 4;25(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08651-3.