Laboratory of Immunology and Allergology, S. Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
J Immunol Methods. 2018 Oct;461:110-116. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
Anti-DFS70 antibodies have been recently included in a new testing algorithm for patients with suspicion of connective tissue diseases (CTDs). This algorithm enables to assess the probability of having a CTD in patients with a positive antinuclear antibodies (ANA) result. The aim of the study was to analyze the the inter-method agreement between three different HEp-2 cell substrates for anti-DFS70 detection, focusing on two novel IIF methods that assess the presence of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies.
Immunological and clinical records of 29 patients who were double positive for anti-DFS70 autoantibodies using chemiluminescence assay (CIA) and Immunoblot (IB) were studied. The IIF on HEp-2 cells were determined using slides from Inova Diagnostics, Euroimmun and Immco. The capability to detect isolated anti-DFS70 antibodies was compared using immunoadsorption on NOVA Lite HEp-2 Select (Inova Diagnostics) and the HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 knockout test (Immco).
The three substrates had very good sensitivity for detecting patients with anti-DFS staining pattern (93.1%, 79.3% and 72.4% for Euroimmun, Immco and Inova respectively). Most of the patients had full inhibition of DFS pattern (65.5%) by immunoabsorption test. Also, the 55.2% of the subjects were positive for monospecific DFS pattern using HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 knockout test. However, the correlation between the full inhibition by immunoadsorption and the monospecific DFS pattern in knockout cells was very low (kappa: 0.22).
The evaluation of monospecific anti-DFS70 antibodies is clinically fundamental and challenging using traditional HEp-2 IIF. Results obtained in this study support the hypothesis that the lack of standardization across IIF kits along with the subjectivity of user interpretation among other factors contribute to the overall reduction in the agreement.
抗 DFS70 抗体最近被纳入一种新的结缔组织疾病(CTD)患者检测算法中。该算法能够评估抗核抗体(ANA)阳性患者发生 CTD 的可能性。本研究的目的是分析三种不同 HEp-2 细胞底物检测抗 DFS70 的方法之间的一致性,重点关注两种新的 IIF 方法,这些方法评估存在单特异性抗 DFS70 抗体。
对使用化学发光测定法(CIA)和免疫印迹(IB)双重检测到抗 DFS70 自身抗体的 29 名患者的免疫和临床记录进行了研究。使用 Inova Diagnostics、Euroimmun 和 Immco 的载玻片在 HEp-2 细胞上进行 IIF。使用 NOVA Lite HEp-2 Select(Inova Diagnostics)和 HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 敲除试验(Immco)进行免疫吸附来比较检测分离的抗 DFS70 抗体的能力。
三种底物对检测抗 DFS 染色模式的患者具有非常高的敏感性(分别为 93.1%、79.3%和 72.4%)。免疫吸附试验中,大多数患者的 DFS 模式得到完全抑制(65.5%)。此外,55.2%的受试者使用 HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 敲除试验检测到单特异性 DFS 模式阳性。然而,免疫吸附试验中的完全抑制与敲除细胞中单特异性 DFS 模式之间的相关性非常低(kappa:0.22)。
使用传统的 HEp-2 IIF 评估单特异性抗 DFS70 抗体具有重要的临床意义,但具有挑战性。本研究结果支持以下假设,即 IIF 试剂盒之间缺乏标准化以及用户解释的主观性等因素导致整体一致性降低。