Programme in Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hopp Children's Cancer Center at the NCT Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Acta Neuropathol. 2018 Aug;136(2):227-237. doi: 10.1007/s00401-018-1888-x. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
Posterior fossa ependymoma comprise three distinct molecular variants, termed PF-EPN-A (PFA), PF-EPN-B (PFB), and PF-EPN-SE (subependymoma). Clinically, they are very disparate and PFB tumors are currently being considered for a trial of radiation avoidance. However, to move forward, unraveling the heterogeneity within PFB would be highly desirable. To discern the molecular heterogeneity within PFB, we performed an integrated analysis consisting of DNA methylation profiling, copy-number profiling, gene expression profiling, and clinical correlation across a cohort of 212 primary posterior fossa PFB tumors. Unsupervised spectral clustering and t-SNE analysis of genome-wide methylation data revealed five distinct subtypes of PFB tumors, termed PFB1-5, with distinct demographics, copy-number alterations, and gene expression profiles. All PFB subtypes were distinct from PFA and posterior fossa subependymomas. Of the five subtypes, PFB4 and PFB5 are more discrete, consisting of younger and older patients, respectively, with a strong female-gender enrichment in PFB5 (age: p = 0.011, gender: p = 0.04). Broad copy-number aberrations were common; however, many events such as chromosome 2 loss, 5 gain, and 17 loss were enriched in specific subtypes and 1q gain was enriched in PFB1. Late relapses were common across all five subtypes, but deaths were uncommon and present in only two subtypes (PFB1 and PFB3). Unlike the case in PFA ependymoma, 1q gain was not a robust marker of poor progression-free survival; however, chromosome 13q loss may represent a novel marker for risk stratification across the spectrum of PFB subtypes. Similar to PFA ependymoma, there exists a significant intertumoral heterogeneity within PFB, with distinct molecular subtypes identified. Even when accounting for this heterogeneity, extent of resection remains the strongest predictor of poor outcome. However, this biological heterogeneity must be accounted for in future preclinical modeling and personalized therapies.
后颅窝室管膜瘤包含三个不同的分子变体,分别称为 PF-EPN-A(PFA)、PF-EPN-B(PFB)和 PF-EPN-SE(室管膜下瘤)。临床上,它们非常不同,PFB 肿瘤目前正在考虑避免放疗。然而,为了向前推进,阐明 PFB 内部的异质性将是非常理想的。为了识别 PFB 中的分子异质性,我们对 212 例原发性后颅窝 PFB 肿瘤的队列进行了包括 DNA 甲基化谱分析、拷贝数谱分析、基因表达谱分析和临床相关性的综合分析。全基因组甲基化数据的无监督谱聚类和 t-SNE 分析揭示了 PFB 肿瘤的五个不同亚型,分别称为 PFB1-5,具有不同的人口统计学、拷贝数改变和基因表达谱。所有 PFB 亚型均与 PFA 和后颅窝室管膜下瘤不同。在这五个亚型中,PFB4 和 PFB5 更为离散,分别由年轻和年长的患者组成,PFB5 中女性性别明显富集(年龄:p=0.011,性别:p=0.04)。广泛的拷贝数异常很常见;然而,许多事件,如染色体 2 缺失、5 号染色体增益和 17 号染色体缺失,在特定亚型中富集,1q 增益在 PFB1 中富集。所有五个亚型都经常出现晚期复发,但死亡很少见,仅存在于两个亚型(PFB1 和 PFB3)中。与 PFA 室管膜瘤不同,1q 增益不是无进展生存期不良的可靠标志物;然而,13q 染色体缺失可能代表 PFB 亚型谱中风险分层的一个新标志物。与 PFA 室管膜瘤相似,PFB 中存在显著的肿瘤间异质性,确定了不同的分子亚型。即使考虑到这种异质性,切除范围仍然是不良预后的最强预测因子。然而,在未来的临床前建模和个性化治疗中,必须考虑这种生物学异质性。