• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在美国,基于云技术的快速现场检测对类风湿性关节炎诊断的潜在价值。

The potential value of rapid, cloud-enabled onsite testing for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States.

作者信息

Bognar Katalin, Shafrin Jason, Brauer Michelle, Zhao Lauren, Hockett Rick, O'Neil Michael, Jena Anupam

机构信息

a Precision Health Economics , Los Angeles , CA , USA.

b Genalyte , San Diego , CA , USA.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2018 Nov;21(11):1057-1066. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1502191. Epub 2018 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1080/13696998.2018.1502191
PMID:30019600
Abstract

AIMS

Improvements in information technology have granted the recent development of rapid, cloud-enabled, onsite laboratory testing for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aims to quantify the value to payers of such technologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To calculate the value of rapid, cloud-enabled, onsite laboratory testing to diagnose RA relative to traditional, centralized laboratory testing, an Excel-based decision tree model was created that simulated potential cost-savings to payers who cover routine evaluations of RA patients in the US. First, a conceptual framework was created to identify the value components of rapid, cloud-enabled onsite testing. Second, value associated with patient time savings, savings on visit fees, change in treatment costs, and QALY improvements was measured, leveraging existing literature and information from an observational study. Lastly, these value components were combined to estimate the total incremental value accruing to payers per patient-year relative to centralized laboratory testing.

RESULTS

Rapid, cloud-enabled, onsite testing is estimated to save one office and 1.81 laboratory visits during the evaluation period for the average patient. Results from an observational study found that rapid, cloud-enabled testing increased the likelihood of completing diagnostic orders from 84.5% to 97%, resulting in an increased probability of early treatment (3.5 percentage points) with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs among patients eligible for treatment. The combined total value was $5,648 per evaluated patient-year. This value is primarily attributed to health benefits of early treatment ($5,048), fewer visit payments ($459), and patient time savings due to fewer office ($216) and laboratory visits ($255).

LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Data on the impact of rapid, cloud-enabled, onsite testing on patient health, care delivery, and clinical decision-making is scarce. More robust real-world data would confirm the validity of our model. Rapid, cloud-enabled, onsite testing has the potential to generate significant value to payers.

摘要

目的

信息技术的进步推动了类风湿关节炎(RA)快速、基于云的现场实验室检测的近期发展。本研究旨在量化此类技术对支付方的价值。

材料与方法

为了计算相对于传统集中式实验室检测而言,快速、基于云的现场实验室检测在诊断RA方面对支付方的价值,创建了一个基于Excel的决策树模型,该模型模拟了为美国RA患者进行常规评估的支付方可能节省的成本。首先,创建一个概念框架以确定快速、基于云的现场检测的价值组成部分。其次,利用现有文献和一项观察性研究的信息,衡量与节省患者时间、节省就诊费用、治疗成本变化以及质量调整生命年(QALY)改善相关的价值。最后,将这些价值组成部分相结合,以估计相对于集中式实验室检测,每位患者每年支付方获得的总增量价值。

结果

据估计,对于普通患者,在评估期间快速、基于云的现场检测可节省一次门诊就诊和1.81次实验室检测就诊。一项观察性研究的结果发现,快速、基于云的检测将完成诊断医嘱的可能性从84.5%提高到97%,从而使符合治疗条件的患者使用改善病情抗风湿药物进行早期治疗的概率提高了3.5个百分点。每位评估患者每年的总价值为5648美元。这一价值主要归因于早期治疗的健康益处(5048美元)、较少的就诊费用(459美元)以及由于门诊就诊(216美元)和实验室检测就诊次数减少(255美元)而节省的患者时间。

局限性与结论

关于快速、基于云的现场检测对患者健康、医疗服务提供和临床决策影响的数据稀缺。更有力的真实世界数据将证实我们模型的有效性。快速、基于云的现场检测有可能为支付方创造巨大价值。

相似文献

1
The potential value of rapid, cloud-enabled onsite testing for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States.在美国,基于云技术的快速现场检测对类风湿性关节炎诊断的潜在价值。
J Med Econ. 2018 Nov;21(11):1057-1066. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1502191. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
2
Heart rate variability testing: could it change spending for rheumatoid arthritis patients in the United States? An exploratory economic analysis.心率变异性测试:它会改变美国类风湿性关节炎患者的治疗费用吗?一项探索性经济分析。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jul;21(7):712-720. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1470519. Epub 2018 May 11.
3
Modelling the cost effectiveness of TNF-alpha antagonists in the management of rheumatoid arthritis: results from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Registry.模拟肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂治疗类风湿关节炎的成本效益:来自英国风湿病学会生物制剂注册处的结果
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Aug;46(8):1345-54. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem115. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
4
Cost-utility analysis of certolizumab pegol in combination with methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis in Greece.在希腊,对中重度活动期类风湿关节炎患者,采用培塞利珠单抗联合甲氨蝶呤进行成本-效用分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Sep;37(9):1441-1452. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3736-z. Epub 2017 May 18.
5
The economics of treatment in early rheumatoid arthritis.早期类风湿关节炎的治疗经济学
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Feb;23(1):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2008.11.005.
6
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
7
Infliximab: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in rheumatoid arthritis.英夫利昔单抗:对其在类风湿关节炎治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(2):107-32. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422020-00004.
8
[Contribution of leflunomide to the cost effectiveness of sequential DMARD therapy of rheumatoid arthritis in Germany].来氟米特对德国类风湿关节炎序贯性改善病情抗风湿药治疗成本效益的贡献
Z Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;63(1):59-75. doi: 10.1007/s00393-004-0570-y.
9
Cost per response for abatacept versus adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis by ACPA subgroups in Germany, Italy, Spain, US and Canada.在德国、意大利、西班牙、美国和加拿大,按抗环瓜氨酸肽(ACPA)亚组划分,类风湿关节炎中阿巴西普与阿达木单抗的每反应成本。
Rheumatol Int. 2017 Jul;37(7):1111-1123. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3739-9. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
Treatment of very early rheumatoid arthritis with symptomatic therapy, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, or biologic agents: a cost-effectiveness analysis.采用对症治疗、改善病情抗风湿药或生物制剂治疗极早期类风湿关节炎:一项成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 3;151(9):612-21. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-9-200911030-00006.