Suppr超能文献

滑膜 α 防御素和滑膜 C 反应蛋白在诊断人工关节周围感染中的临床评价。

Clinical Evaluation of Synovial Alpha Defensin and Synovial C-Reactive Protein in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 18;100(14):1184-1190. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00556.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty is often challenging. The alpha defensin test has been recently reported as a promising diagnostic test for periprosthetic joint infection. The goal of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of alpha defensin testing.

METHODS

One hundred and eighty-three synovial alpha defensin and synovial fluid C-reactive protein (CRP) tests performed in 183 patients undergoing evaluation for periprosthetic joint infection were reviewed. Results were compared with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria for periprosthetic joint infection.

RESULTS

Alpha defensin tests were performed prior to surgical treatment for infection, and 37 of these patients who had these tests were diagnosed by MSIS criteria as having infections. Among this group, the alpha defensin test had a sensitivity of 81.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64.8% to 92.0%) and a specificity of 95.9% (95% CI, 91.3% to 98.5%). There were 6 false-positive results, 4 of which were associated with metallosis. There were 7 false negatives, all of which were associated with either draining sinuses (n = 3) or low-virulence organisms (n = 4). A combined analysis of alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests was performed in which a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test and a positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 28). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated to be 73.0% (95% CI, 55.9% to 86.2%) and the specificity was calculated to be 99.3% (95% CI, 96.2% to 99.9%). An additional combined analysis was performed where a positive result was represented by a positive alpha defensin test or positive synovial fluid CRP test (n = 64). Among this group, the sensitivity was calculated to be 91.9% (95% CI, 78.1% to 98.3%) and the specificity was calculated to be 79.5% (95% CI, 72.0% to 85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Alpha defensin in combination with synovial fluid CRP demonstrates very high sensitivity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection, but may yield false-positive results in the presence of metallosis or false-negative results in the presence of low-virulence organisms. When both alpha defensin and synovial fluid CRP tests are positive, there is a very high specificity for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

全膝关节置换术后诊断假体周围关节感染常常具有挑战性。α-防御素检测最近被报道为一种有前途的假体周围关节感染诊断检测方法。本研究的目的是确定α-防御素检测的诊断准确性。

方法

对 183 例接受假体周围关节感染评估的患者进行了 183 例滑膜α-防御素和滑液 C 反应蛋白(CRP)检测,回顾了这些患者的检测结果,并与肌骨骼感染学会(MSIS)假体周围关节感染标准进行了比较。

结果

α-防御素检测在感染的外科治疗前进行,其中 37 例根据 MSIS 标准诊断为感染的患者进行了这些检测。在这一组中,α-防御素检测的敏感性为 81.1%(95%置信区间[CI],64.8%至 92.0%),特异性为 95.9%(95%CI,91.3%至 98.5%)。有 6 个假阳性结果,其中 4 个与金属沉着症有关。有 7 个假阴性结果,均与引流窦(n=3)或低毒力生物体(n=4)有关。对α-防御素和滑液 CRP 检测进行了联合分析,其中阳性结果代表阳性α-防御素检测和阳性滑液 CRP 检测(n=28)。在这一组中,计算出的敏感性为 73.0%(95%CI,55.9%至 86.2%),特异性为 99.3%(95%CI,96.2%至 99.9%)。还进行了另一种联合分析,其中阳性结果代表阳性α-防御素检测或阳性滑液 CRP 检测(n=64)。在这一组中,计算出的敏感性为 91.9%(95%CI,78.1%至 98.3%),特异性为 79.5%(95%CI,72.0%至 85.7%)。

结论

α-防御素联合滑液 CRP 检测对诊断假体周围关节感染具有很高的敏感性,但在金属沉着症存在时可能会产生假阳性结果,在低毒力生物体存在时可能会产生假阴性结果。当α-防御素和滑液 CRP 检测均为阳性时,诊断假体周围关节感染的特异性非常高。

证据水平

诊断 III 级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验