Suppr超能文献

用于诊断人工关节周围感染的滑液生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析

Synovial Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lee Yong Seuk, Koo Kyung-Hoi, Kim Hyun Jung, Tian Shaoqi, Kim Tae-Young, Maltenfort Mitchell G, Chen Antonia F

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20;99(24):2077-2084. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00123.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The search for a single standard reference test for determining periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) through analysis of synovial fluid has yielded numerous biomarkers as potential candidates. The purpose of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid biomarkers and to determine which test has the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

An online literature search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified 33 articles reporting a total of 13 major parameters for diagnosing PJI through analysis of synovial fluid. Each of the included articles was independently analyzed for risk of bias and for concerns regarding applicability utilizing the QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2) tool. The mada (meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy) tool was used to generate forest plots for sensitivity, specificity, and the log of the DOR, as well as summary statistics.

RESULTS

In this analysis, 13 index tests (leukocyte count; measurement of the percentage of polymorphonucleocytes [PMN%] and the levels of C-reactive protein [CRP], α-defensin, leukocyte esterase [LE], interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1β, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [G-CSF]; culture; and polymerase chain reaction [PCR] analysis) were evaluated on the basis of ≥2 articles. Of these tests, 8 (leukocyte count, PMN%, CRP, α-defensin, LE, IL-6, IL-8, and culture) were appropriate for pooled analysis. The overall sensitivity of these 8 markers was 0.85, and all but culture showed a sensitivity of ≥0.8. All markers showed a specificity of ≥0.9. Of the 8 tests, measurement of the α-defensin level showed the highest log DOR.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial fluid leukocyte count, PMN%, CRP, α-defensin, LE, IL-6, and IL-8 all demonstrated high sensitivity for diagnosing PJI, with α-defensin being the best synovial marker based on the highest log DOR. However, other synovial fluid tests that demonstrate good diagnostic performance can also be used in combination for the diagnosis of PJI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

通过分析滑液来寻找一种用于确定人工关节周围感染(PJI)的单一标准参考检测方法,已产生了众多生物标志物作为潜在候选物。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估滑液生物标志物的诊断准确性,并确定哪种检测方法对PJI诊断具有最高的诊断比值比(DOR)。

方法

对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行在线文献检索,共识别出33篇报告通过分析滑液诊断PJI的13项主要参数的文章。使用QUADAS-2(诊断准确性研究质量评估-2)工具对每篇纳入文章的偏倚风险和适用性问题进行独立分析。使用mada(诊断准确性荟萃分析)工具生成敏感性、特异性和DOR对数的森林图以及汇总统计量。

结果

在本分析中,基于≥2篇文章对13项指标检测(白细胞计数;多形核白细胞百分比[PMN%]及C反应蛋白[CRP]、α-防御素、白细胞酯酶[LE]、白细胞介素[IL]-6、IL-8、IL-10、IL-1β、血管内皮生长因子[VEGF]和粒细胞集落刺激因子[G-CSF]的水平测定;培养;以及聚合酶链反应[PCR]分析)进行了评估。在这些检测中,8项(白细胞计数、PMN%、CRP、α-防御素、LE、IL-6、IL-8和培养)适合进行汇总分析。这8种标志物的总体敏感性为0.85,除培养外所有标志物的敏感性均≥0.8。所有标志物的特异性均≥0.9。在这8项检测中,α-防御素水平测定的DOR对数最高。

结论

滑液白细胞计数、PMN%、CRP、α-防御素、LE、IL-6和IL-8对PJI诊断均显示出高敏感性,基于最高的DOR对数,α-防御素是最佳的滑液标志物。然而,其他显示出良好诊断性能的滑液检测方法也可联合用于PJI的诊断。

证据水平

诊断性IV级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验