Institute for Health and Behaviour, INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 18;13(7):e0200629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200629. eCollection 2018.
Attention has been theorized to play a key role in the experience of pain and associated task interference. Training attention away from pain via attention bias modification (ABM) training techniques has been proposed to improve pain-related outcomes, but evidence is inconsistent. In an experimental study, we investigated the impact of a single session ABM training -using a visual probe paradigm with idiosyncratic pain words- on cold pressor test (CPT) pain experience and task interference by pain. Fifty-eight healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to an ABM training group (N = 28; attending away from pain) and a sham training group (N = 30; no training direction). At pre-training, participants performed a baseline Random-Interval-Repetition (RIR) task and the CPT. Participants reported on sensations they experienced during the baseline CPT. Relevant descriptors were integrated in the visual probe paradigm during the training phase. At post-training, participants completed the RIR task again while experiencing CPT pain. Participants also reported on the extent they attended to the pain and the intensity/unpleasantness of the pain. Results indicated that, in contrast with our hypotheses, ABM training did also not reduce task interference due to CPT pain. Furthermore, ABM training did not change self-reported attending to CPT pain. Finally, ABM training did not reduce CPT pain intensity or pain unpleasantness. Overall, the current study provides no support for the effectiveness of a single session ABM training in improving pain-related outcomes. Future research addressing the conditions under which ABM training improves or fails to improve pain-related outcomes is warranted.
注意力被认为在疼痛体验和相关任务干扰中起着关键作用。通过注意力偏差修正 (ABM) 训练技术将注意力从疼痛上转移开,以改善与疼痛相关的结果,这一观点已经提出,但证据并不一致。在一项实验研究中,我们调查了单次 ABM 训练(使用带有个体疼痛词汇的视觉探针范式)对冷加压测试 (CPT) 疼痛体验和疼痛相关任务干扰的影响。58 名健康志愿者被随机分配到 ABM 训练组(N=28;注意力远离疼痛)和假训练组(N=30;无训练方向)。在训练前,参与者进行了基线随机间隔重复 (RIR) 任务和 CPT。参与者报告了在基线 CPT 期间经历的感觉。在训练阶段,相关描述符被整合到视觉探针范式中。在训练后,参与者再次在经历 CPT 疼痛的同时完成 RIR 任务。参与者还报告了他们对疼痛的注意力程度以及疼痛的强度/不适程度。结果表明,与我们的假设相反,ABM 训练也没有减少 CPT 疼痛引起的任务干扰。此外,ABM 训练并没有改变自我报告的对 CPT 疼痛的关注度。最后,ABM 训练并没有降低 CPT 疼痛的强度或不适程度。总的来说,本研究不支持单次 ABM 训练改善与疼痛相关结果的有效性。未来的研究需要进一步探讨 ABM 训练在何种条件下可以改善或不能改善与疼痛相关的结果。