J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Oct;118(10):1951-1957. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
Integrated health care models create opportunities for registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) to provide nutrition-related care and engage in multidisciplinary teams to improve clinical outcomes. While benefits of integrated care (IC) have been reported, little is known about the impact of the RDN within an IC model.
Our primary objective was to identify whether IC vs traditional care (TC) increases the number of RDN patient visits. Our secondary objective was to evaluate clinical outcomes of patients seeing an RDN vs not, regardless of care model.
This was a retrospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS/SETTING: Patients were aged 3 to 94 years and from a patient-centered medical home in Boston, MA.
We measured 3-month total and average number of patients seen by the RDN in TC vs IC. Changes in adult hemoglobin A1c, weight, and pediatric body mass index (measured as kg/m) among high-risk patients seen by an RDN compared to patients not seen by an RDN.
Data were obtained from electronic medical records and analyzed utilizing Mann-Whitney U test, analysis of covariance, and paired sample t tests.
The RDN saw 145 patients (137 adult, 8 pediatric) in the TC model compared to 185 patients (135 adult, 50 pediatric) in the IC model. Mean number of patients seen per session was 3.20 in the TC model vs 4.63 in the IC model (P=0.004). Adult hemoglobin A1c within-group differences decreased by 0.42%±1.49% (P=0.007) for patients seen by an RDN and decreased 0.15%±1.47% (P=0.012) for patients not seen by an RDN. Adult weight within-group differences decreased 1.0±7.2 kg (P=0.15) for patients seen by a RDN and increased 0.1±5.6 kg (P=0.70) for patients not seen by a RDN. Pediatric BMI showed no change between or within groups.
The IC model increased 3-month total number of patients seen by an RDN. High-risk patients who saw an RDN had a significant decrease in hemoglobin A1c.
综合医疗模式为注册营养师提供了提供营养相关护理和参与多学科团队以改善临床结果的机会。虽然已经报道了综合护理(IC)的益处,但对于 RDN 在 IC 模式中的作用知之甚少。
我们的主要目的是确定 IC 与传统护理(TC)相比是否会增加 RDN 患者就诊次数。我们的次要目的是评估无论护理模式如何,接受 RDN 治疗的患者的临床结果。
这是一项回顾性队列研究。
参与者/设置:患者年龄在 3 至 94 岁之间,来自马萨诸塞州波士顿的患者中心化医疗之家。
我们测量了 TC 与 IC 中 3 个月内 RDN 治疗的患者总数和平均就诊次数。与未接受 RDN 治疗的患者相比,接受 RDN 治疗的高危患者的成人血红蛋白 A1c、体重和儿科体重指数(以 kg/m 为单位)的变化。
数据来自电子病历,并利用 Mann-Whitney U 检验、协方差分析和配对样本 t 检验进行分析。
RDN 在 TC 模型中治疗了 145 名患者(137 名成人,8 名儿科),而在 IC 模型中治疗了 185 名患者(135 名成人,50 名儿科)。TC 模型中每位患者每次就诊的平均人数为 3.20,而 IC 模型中为 4.63(P=0.004)。接受 RDN 治疗的患者组内血红蛋白 A1c 差异降低了 0.42%±1.49%(P=0.007),而未接受 RDN 治疗的患者组内差异降低了 0.15%±1.47%(P=0.012)。接受 RDN 治疗的患者组内体重差异减少了 1.0±7.2kg(P=0.15),而未接受 RDN 治疗的患者组内体重差异增加了 0.1±5.6kg(P=0.70)。儿科 BMI 组间或组内均无变化。
IC 模型增加了 3 个月内接受 RDN 治疗的患者总数。接受 RDN 治疗的高危患者血红蛋白 A1c 显著降低。