• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科老年患者的感染和全身炎症反应综合征:30 天风险模型。

Infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in older patients in the emergency department: a 30-day risk model.

机构信息

Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, España.

Servicio de Urgencias, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España.

出版信息

Emergencias. 2018;30(4):241-246.

PMID:30033697
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To build a model to predict 30-day mortality and compare it to prediction based on the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score in patients aged 75 years or older treated for infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in the emergency department.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective analysis of a convenience cohort of patients aged 75 years or older treated for infection and SIRS in 13 Spanish emergency departments in 2013. We recorded demographic variables; comorbidity; risk factors for poor outcome; functional dependence at baseline; site of infection; and hemodynamic, clinical and laboratory findings on start of care.The main outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-nine patients with a mean (SD) age of 84 (5.8) years were included; 186 (49.,1%) were women, 150 (39.6%) had a high degree of comorbidity, and 113 (34.2%) had a high level of functional dependence. Seventy-nine (20.8%) died within 30 days. The model built by the infection working group (INFURG) of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine (SEMES) included the presence of metastasis from a solid tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.4; 95% CI, 1.6-18.2; P=.006), respiratory insufficiency (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.5-6.0; P=.002), renal insufficiency (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.0-5.5; P=.045), arterial hypertension (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.0; P=.015), and altered level of consciousness (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.4-5.8; P=.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the INFURG-OLDER model was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84; P<.001) (vs 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80; P<.001 for the MEDS model).

CONCLUSION

The INFURG-OLDER model has good predictive ability for 30-day mortality in patients aged 75 years or older who are treated in emergency departments for SIRS.

摘要

目的

建立一个模型来预测 30 天死亡率,并将其与基于 75 岁或以上因感染和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)在急诊科接受治疗的患者的 Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis(MEDS)评分的预测进行比较。

材料和方法

对 2013 年在西班牙 13 家急诊科因感染和 SIRS 接受治疗的 75 岁或以上的便利队列患者进行前瞻性分析。我们记录了人口统计学变量;合并症;不良预后的危险因素;基线时的功能依赖;感染部位;以及开始治疗时的血流动力学、临床和实验室发现。主要结局变量是 30 天全因死亡率。

结果

共纳入 379 名平均(标准差)年龄为 84(5.8)岁的患者;186 名(49.1%)为女性,150 名(39.6%)有高度合并症,113 名(34.2%)有高度功能依赖。79 名(20.8%)在 30 天内死亡。由西班牙急诊医学学会(SEMES)感染工作组(INFURG)建立的模型包括来自实体瘤的转移(比值比 [OR],5.4;95%置信区间,1.6-18.2;P=.006)、呼吸衰竭(OR,3.02;95%置信区间,1.5-6.0;P=.002)、肾功能不全(OR,2.4;95%置信区间,1.0-5.5;P=.045)、动脉高血压(OR,2.4;95%置信区间,1.2-5.0;P=.015)和意识水平改变(OR,2.9;95%置信区间,1.4-5.8;P=.003)。INFURG-OLDER 模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.78(95%置信区间,0.72-0.84;P<.001)(vs 0.72(95%置信区间,0.64-0.80;P<.001 为 MEDS 模型)。

结论

INFURG-OLDER 模型对因 SIRS 在急诊科接受治疗的 75 岁或以上患者的 30 天死亡率具有良好的预测能力。

相似文献

1
Infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome in older patients in the emergency department: a 30-day risk model.急诊科老年患者的感染和全身炎症反应综合征:30 天风险模型。
Emergencias. 2018;30(4):241-246.
2
Performance of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in predicting 28-day hospital mortality in older adult patients with sepsis.老年营养风险指数预测老年脓毒症患者 28 天住院死亡率的性能。
Clin Nutr. 2013 Oct;32(5):843-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Prognostic accuracy of SIRS criteria, qSOFA score and GYM score for 30-day-mortality in older non-severely dependent infected patients attended in the emergency department.全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分和 GYM 评分对急诊就诊的非重度依赖感染老年患者 30 天死亡率的预后准确性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017 Dec;36(12):2361-2369. doi: 10.1007/s10096-017-3068-7. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
4
Validation of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score in patients with the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)患者的急诊科脓毒症死亡率(MEDS)评分的验证
Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):421-6. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0B013E3181611F6A0.
5
Risk stratification of the potentially septic patient in the emergency department: the Mortality in the Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score.急诊科潜在脓毒症患者的风险分层:急诊科脓毒症死亡率(MEDS)评分
J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;37(3):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 8.
6
[Hospital emergency room diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients aged 2 to 20 years: the INFURG-SEMES score from the emergency infections study of the Spanish Society of Emergency Medicine].[西班牙急诊医学学会急诊感染研究中2至20岁患者急性阑尾炎的医院急诊室诊断:INFURG-SEMES评分]
Emergencias. 2017 Jul;29(4):231-236.
7
Prognostic Accuracy of Sepsis-3 Criteria for In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Suspected Infection Presenting to the Emergency Department.Sepsis-3 标准对急诊科疑似感染患者住院死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):301-308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20329.
8
Predictive accuracy and feasibility of risk stratification scores for 28-day mortality of patients with sepsis in an emergency department.急诊科脓毒症患者28天死亡率风险分层评分的预测准确性及可行性
Eur J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;22(5):331-7. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000185.
9
Ability of lactate, procalcitonin, and criteria defining sepsis to predict 30-day mortality, bacteremia, and microbiologically confirmed infection in patients with infection suspicion treated in emergency departments.乳酸、降钙素原以及脓毒症定义标准在预测急诊科疑似感染患者30天死亡率、菌血症及微生物学确诊感染方面的能力。
Emergencias. 2022 Jun;34(3):181-189.
10
[A comparison of severity of illness scoring system for emergency department patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome].[急诊科全身炎症反应综合征患者疾病严重程度评分系统的比较]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2009 Dec;21(12):715-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of predictors for mortality and bacteraemia in patients suspected of infection.疑似感染患者的死亡率和菌血症预测因子的比较。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 23;21(1):864. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06547-0.
2
[Development of a predictive model for hospital mortality and re-admission in a cohort of infected patients that require hospitalization].[针对需要住院治疗的感染患者队列建立医院死亡率和再入院预测模型]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Oct;33(5):350-357. doi: 10.37201/req/063.2020. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
[Strategies for improving the antibiotic treatment prescription in the Emergency Department].
[改善急诊科抗生素治疗处方的策略]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2020 Feb;33(1):85-86. doi: 10.37201/req/102.2019. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
A multidrug-resistant microorganism infection risk prediction model: development and validation in an emergency medicine population.一种多重耐药微生物感染风险预测模型:在急诊人群中的开发和验证。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Feb;39(2):309-323. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03727-4. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
[Comment on: Considerations in antimicrobial prescribing in the emergency department].[对《急诊科抗菌药物处方的考量》的评论]
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 Feb;32(1):95-96. Epub 2019 Jan 24.