Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2728-2738. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.04.025. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literature to evaluate the reliability, or the ability of a repeated measurement to yield consistent results, and validity of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at evaluating anatomy and pathology of the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Furthermore, the incidence and association of ALL injury with the pivot-shift examination, and other structural injuries, will be reviewed for additional clinical relevance.
Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, 2 reviewers independently searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane, EBSCOhost, OVID, and Web of Science databases for all studies related to imaging of the ALL. All eligible articles and their references were screened by both reviewers. Studies discussing diagnostic imaging of the ALL with regard to identification of injury to the structure in patients with suspected ACL injury were included. No restrictions regarding date of publication, type of publication, or language in the included article were applied. The exclusion criteria included commentaries, case reports, and studies that did not attempt to identify the ALL as a discrete structure. Quality assessment and data extraction was performed for each included study before final analysis was performed.
A total of 13 articles were included for final analysis. In the included studies, at least 1 portion of the ALL could be visualized on MRI in 76% to 100% of knees, and injury to the ALL was identified in 10.8% to 62.5% of patients. Inter- and intraobserver reliabilities ranged from moderate to almost perfect. There was a consensus among studies that ALL injuries were significantly associated with injuries to the lateral collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, iliotibial band, and bony contusions to the lateral tibia and femur. Most of the included studies found a significant association of injuries to the ALL and a high-grade pivot-shift examination. Only 2 studies used US to evaluate for injury to the ALL, and both studies had almost perfect interobserver reliability. Only 1 study confirmed initial diagnoses at the time of the ACL reconstruction surgery.
In patients with ACL injuries, concomitant ALL injuries can be identified on MRI or US with high levels of inter- and intraobserver reliability, and are often associated with a high-grade pivot-shift examination, lateral collateral ligament injury, and lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau bone bruises.
Level IV, systematic review of level II-IV studies.
本研究旨在系统地回顾文献,评估超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)在评估前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤时膝关节前外侧韧带(ALL)解剖结构和病理的可靠性(即重复测量产生一致结果的能力)和有效性。此外,还将回顾 ALL 损伤与枢轴转移试验以及其他结构损伤的发生率和相关性,以增加其临床相关性。
根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,2 名审查员独立检索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane、EBSCOhost、OVID 和 Web of Science 数据库中与 ALL 成像相关的所有研究。两位审查员都对所有合格的文章及其参考文献进行了筛选。纳入了讨论 ALL 影像学诊断以确定疑似 ACL 损伤患者结构损伤的所有研究。纳入文章没有对发表日期、出版物类型或语言进行限制。排除标准包括评论、病例报告以及未尝试将 ALL 确定为独立结构的研究。在进行最终分析之前,对每项纳入的研究进行质量评估和数据提取。
共有 13 篇文章纳入最终分析。在纳入的研究中,至少有 1 部分 ALL 可以在 MRI 上显示,在 76%至 100%的膝关节中,ALL 损伤在 10.8%至 62.5%的患者中被识别。观察者间和观察者内的可靠性范围从中度到几乎完美。研究之间达成共识,认为 ALL 损伤与外侧副韧带、腘肌腱、髂胫束以及外侧胫骨和股骨的骨挫伤明显相关。大多数纳入的研究发现 ALL 损伤与高等级枢轴转移试验显著相关。只有 2 项研究使用 US 评估 ALL 损伤,这两项研究的观察者间可靠性几乎完美。只有 1 项研究在 ACL 重建手术时证实了最初的诊断。
在 ACL 损伤患者中,MRI 或 US 可高度可靠地检测到并发的 ALL 损伤,并且通常与高等级枢轴转移试验、外侧副韧带损伤以及外侧股骨髁和胫骨平台骨挫伤相关。
IV 级,对 II-IV 级研究的系统评价。