Fraval Andrew, Duncan Sam, Murray Theresa, Duggan Jeremy, Tirosh Oren, Tran Phong
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.
2 St Vincents Private, East Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hip Int. 2019 May;29(3):239-244. doi: 10.1177/1120700018780125. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
We examined the blood conserving effect of tranexamic acid in total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach with enoxaparin as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) chemoprophylaxis, and whether this translates to an effect on functional outcomes in the perioperative period. We also compare the effect of aspirin and enoxaparin as DVT chemoprophylactic agents.
We conducted a single-centre randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. 105 patients were randomised to receive either tranexamic acid or an equivalent volume of normal saline with enoxaparin used as DVT chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome measure was thigh swelling. Blood loss and the incidence of blood transfusions was also recorded. Secondary outcome measures including postoperative functional scores and mobility, pain scores and length of stay. We also compared and pooled the results of a previous study with the same study intervention methodology which used aspirin as DVT chemoprophylaxis instead of enoxaparin.
There were no statistically significant differences between the primary outcome of thigh swelling. There was significantly less intraoperative blood loss observed in the tranexamic acid (TXA) group (0.510 L, SD 0.210) compared with the control group (0.698, SD 0.301) ( p < 0.001). The estimated blood loss was also significantly less in the TXA group (1.130 L, SD 0.311) compared with the control group (1.48 L, SD 0.510) ( p < 0.001). Pooled data of both consecutive trials showed there was a statistically significant reduction in length of stay for those that received TXA (3.72 days, SD 0.83 versus 4.24 days, SD 0.97, p < 0.001). There was also a statistically significant increased risk of a transfusion in the control group as compared those that received TXA (OR 5.5, 1.188 to 25.449, p = 0.029). There was no difference in blood loss between DVT chemoprophylactic agents.
TXA is an effective agent in reducing blood loss in THR using the anterior approach and was not affected by choice of DVT chemoprophylaxis. Patients who received TXA had fewer transfusions and a reduction in their length of stay. The blood conserving effect of TXA was not associated with improved postoperative recovery across the measures of pain and mobility.
ANZCTR number: ACTRN12616000606482.
我们研究了氨甲环酸在全髋关节置换术中采用直接前路手术并使用依诺肝素进行深静脉血栓(DVT)化学预防时的血液保护作用,以及这是否会转化为对围手术期功能结局的影响。我们还比较了阿司匹林和依诺肝素作为DVT化学预防药物的效果。
我们进行了一项单中心随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。105例患者被随机分配接受氨甲环酸或等量生理盐水,并使用依诺肝素进行DVT化学预防。主要结局指标是大腿肿胀。还记录了失血量和输血发生率。次要结局指标包括术后功能评分和活动能力、疼痛评分及住院时间。我们还比较并汇总了一项先前研究的结果,该研究采用相同的研究干预方法,但使用阿司匹林而非依诺肝素进行DVT化学预防。
大腿肿胀这一主要结局在两组之间无统计学显著差异。与对照组(0.698,标准差0.301)相比,氨甲环酸(TXA)组术中观察到的失血量显著更少(0.510L,标准差0.210)(p<0.001)。TXA组的估计失血量也显著少于对照组(1.130L,标准差0.311)(1.48L,标准差0.510)(p<0.001)。两项连续试验的汇总数据显示,接受TXA治疗的患者住院时间有统计学显著缩短(3.72天,标准差0.83对4.24天,标准差0.97,p<0.001)。与接受TXA治疗的患者相比,对照组输血风险在统计学上显著增加(比值比5.5,1.188至25.449,p=0.029)。DVT化学预防药物之间的失血量无差异。
TXA是一种有效减少前路全髋关节置换术失血量的药物,且不受DVT化学预防药物选择的影响。接受TXA治疗的患者输血次数更少且住院时间缩短。TXA的血液保护作用与疼痛和活动能力等指标的术后恢复改善无关。
ANZCTR编号:ACTRN12616000606482