Järvinen Mirkka, Stolt Minna, Honkala Eino, Leino-Kilpi Helena, Pöllänen Marja
a Institute of Dentistry , University of Turku , Turku , Finland.
b Department of Nursing Science , University of Turku , Turku , Finland.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2018 Nov;76(8):612-620. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1490964. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
To evaluate behavioural and educational interventions used to improve self-care in adult periodontitis patients in comparison with conventional instruction.
A systematic electronic search of empirical studies that were published up to June 2017 using the MEDLINE database was performed. The reference lists of all of the included studies and articles from six separate journals were manually searched.
A total of 1806 articles were identified. Six articles fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The interventions used in periodontal treatment had theoretical backgrounds of cognitive behavioural approach, self-regulation theory of Leventhal, motivational interviewing and a client self-care commitment model. The control group in each study was described receiving conventional information. The outcomes of the interventions were classified into three categories: 1) clinical findings 2) self-reported self-care and 3) patient evaluations of the intervention. The behavioural intervention groups seemed to perform slightly better than the control groups when clinical outcome measures such as the presence of plaque or number of periodontal pockets were used. Furthermore, behavioural interventions increased patient reported compliance (e.g. effectiveness of self-care and frequency of interdental cleaning). The different behavioural techniques all seemed to work more effectively than conventional instruction. No behavioural technique could be identified superior to the other.
The behavioural interventions seem to be beneficial for patient adherence and may therefore improve periodontal treatment success. However, there is a need to further explore the use of different methods in studies with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up times and both behavioural and clinical outcome measures.
评估用于改善成人牙周炎患者自我护理的行为和教育干预措施,并与传统指导方法进行比较。
利用MEDLINE数据库对截至2017年6月发表的实证研究进行系统的电子检索。对所有纳入研究的参考文献列表以及来自六种不同期刊的文章进行手动检索。
共识别出1806篇文章。六篇文章符合纳入和排除标准。牙周治疗中使用的干预措施具有认知行为方法、莱文塔尔自我调节理论、动机性访谈和客户自我护理承诺模型等理论背景。每项研究中的对照组被描述为接受传统信息。干预措施的结果分为三类:1)临床发现;2)自我报告的自我护理;3)患者对干预措施的评价。当使用诸如菌斑存在情况或牙周袋数量等临床结局指标时,行为干预组的表现似乎略优于对照组。此外,行为干预提高了患者报告的依从性(例如自我护理的有效性和牙间隙清洁的频率)。不同的行为技术似乎都比传统指导更有效。没有一种行为技术被确定优于其他技术。
行为干预似乎对患者的依从性有益,因此可能提高牙周治疗的成功率。然而,有必要在样本量更大、随访时间更长且同时采用行为和临床结局指标的研究中进一步探索不同方法的应用。