Özkocaman Vildan, Özkalemkaş Fahir, Seyhan Serdar, Ener Beyza, Ursavaş Ahmet, Ersal Tuba, Kazak Esra, Demirdöğen Ezgi, Mıstık Reşit, Akalın Halis
Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Bursa, Turkey
Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Microbiology, Bursa, Turkey
Turk J Haematol. 2018 Nov 13;35(4):277-282. doi: 10.4274/tjh.2017.0430. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among neutropenic patients undergoing chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and stem cell transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life impact of posaconazole prophylaxis.
Eighty-four adult patients were included with AML under remission induction chemotherapy and posaconazole prophylaxis. The 34 patients in the control group did not receive primary antifungal prophylaxis. The period between June 2006 and January 2009, when antifungal prophylaxis was not administered (control group), was retrospectively compared to the period between December 2010 and May 2012 when primary oral posaconazole prophylaxis was administered in similar conditions (posaconazole group) according to the use of antifungal agents for treatment, breakthrough infections, galactomannan performance, and the necessity for performing bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) procedures.
The two groups were compared according to the use of antifungal agents; progression to a different antifungal agent was found in 34/34 patients (100%) in the control group and in 9/84 patients (11%) in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). There were four breakthrough IFIs (4/84, 4.8%) in the posaconazole group and 34 IFIs in the control group (p<0.001). In addition, 15/34 patients (44%) in the control group required BAL compared to 11/84 patients (13%) in the posaconazole group (p<0.001). Posaconazole treatment was discontinued within 7-14 days in 7/84 patients (8.3%) due to poor oral compliance related to mucositis after chemotherapy.
Posaconazole appears to be effective and well-tolerated protection against IFIs for AML patients.
侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)是接受急性髓系白血病(AML)化疗和干细胞移植的中性粒细胞减少患者发病和死亡的重要原因。本研究旨在评估泊沙康唑预防的实际效果。
84例接受缓解诱导化疗并采用泊沙康唑预防的成年AML患者纳入研究。34例对照组患者未接受初始抗真菌预防。回顾性比较2006年6月至2009年1月未进行抗真菌预防的时期(对照组)与2010年12月至2012年5月在类似条件下进行初始口服泊沙康唑预防的时期(泊沙康唑组),比较抗真菌药物的使用、突破性感染、半乳甘露聚糖检测结果以及进行支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)操作的必要性。
根据抗真菌药物的使用情况对两组进行比较;对照组34/34例患者(100%)更换为不同的抗真菌药物,泊沙康唑组9/84例患者(11%)更换(p<0.001)。泊沙康唑组有4例突破性IFI(4/84,4.8%),对照组有34例IFI(p<0.001)。此外,对照组15/34例患者(44%)需要进行BAL,泊沙康唑组为11/84例患者(13%)(p<0.001)。84例患者中有7例(8.3%)因化疗后口腔黏膜炎导致口服依从性差,在7 - 14天内停用泊沙康唑治疗。
泊沙康唑似乎对AML患者预防IFI有效且耐受性良好。